Journal

Research Integrity and Peer Review

2058-8615 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

103 verified public works

Browse all journals →

‘Correcting the record on “Publication integrity and industry influences on the editorial process: a case study" Res Integr Peer Rev. 2026;11:49.’ Reply

2026 · 0 citations

Applicants as reviewers: a mixed methods evaluation of the risks, benefits, and potential of distributed peer review for grant funding allocations

2026 · 0 citations

From concept to measurement: operationalizing and normalizing Integrity Risk Indicators by SCImago (IRIS)

2026 · 0 citations

Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review

2021 · 0 citations

Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts

2021 · 0 citations

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science

2021 · 0 citations

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) — a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science

2021 · 0 citations

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

2020 · 0 citations

Survey study of research integrity officers’ perceptions of research practices associated with instances of research misconduct

2020 · 0 citations

Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals

2020 · 0 citations

Do journals instruct authors to address sex and gender in psychological science?

2020 · 0 citations

MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications

2020 · 0 citations

High impact nutrition and dietetics journals’ use of publication procedures to increase research transparency

2020 · 0 citations

Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work

2020 · 0 citations

Quantifying professionalism in peer review

2020 · 0 citations

Publishing computational research - a review of infrastructures for reproducible and transparent scholarly communication

2020 · 0 citations

Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing

2020 · 0 citations

Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion

2020 · 0 citations

The limitations to our understanding of peer review

2020 · 0 citations

Proceedings from the V Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics (V BRISPE)

2020 · 0 citations

Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research

2020 · 0 citations

The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants

2020 · 0 citations

The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

2020 · 0 citations

Impact of US industry payment disclosure laws on payments to surgeons: a natural experiment

2020 · 0 citations

Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam

2019 · 0 citations

Systematic overview of Freedom of Information Act requests to the Department of Health and Human Services from 2008 to 2017

2019 · 0 citations

Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews

2019 · 0 citations

Testing an active intervention to deter researchers’ use of questionable research practices

2019 · 0 citations

Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey

2019 · 0 citations

Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity

2019 · 0 citations