Research graph
References from Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Vary Considerably Across Published Studies: A Systematic Review. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: A 21‐year population‐based study
10.1177/0363546516629944 · 2016 · External reference
A comparison of results in older, middle‐aged, and younger patients after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Minimum 10‐year follow‐up
10.4055/cios22344 · 2024 · External reference
Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther symposium ACL treatment consensus group
10.1007/s00167-020-06012-6 · 2020 · External reference
Modifiable and non‐modifiable risk factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction: A cohort study
10.1186/s43019-024-00243-4 · 2024 · External reference
In vivo kinematic analysis of failure cases after nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A preliminary study
10.1186/s43019-024-00254-1 · 2024 · External reference
Choice of patient‐reported outcome measures for midterm assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
10.1177/03635465221099459 · 2022 · External reference
Satisfactory clinical outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon‐patellar bone allograft
10.4055/cios23409 · 2025 · External reference
Usefulness of current patient‐reported outcome scales for ACL injury: A mixed‐methods evaluation of stakeholder‐perceived utility of specific constructs and items across the rehabilitation timeline
10.1177/23259671231218964 · 2024 · External reference
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
1989 · External reference
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient‐acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review
10.1186/s43019-024-00210-z · 2024 · External reference
Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: The patient acceptable symptom state
10.1136/ard.2004.023028 · 2005 · External reference
Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis
10.2106/jbjs.g.01095 · 2008 · External reference
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient‐acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) following surgical knee ligament reconstruction: A systematic review
10.1007/s00068-024-02708-3 · 2025 · External reference
MCID and PASS in Knee Surgeries. Theoretical aspects and clinical relevance references
10.1007/s00167-023-07359-2 · 2023 · External reference
The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the different calculation methods
10.1177/03635465231152484 · 2023 · External reference
Clinimetrics corner: A closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)
10.1179/2042618612y.0000000001 · 2012 · External reference
Large variability in minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptom state values among literature investigating patellar stabilization surgery: A systematic review
10.1002/ksa.12684 · 2026 · External reference
Substantial variability exists in reporting clinically significant outcome measure thresholds for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review
10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.023 · 2025 · External reference
Methodological index for non‐randomized studies (minors): Development and validation of a new instrument
10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x · 2003 · External reference
Sex and gender equity in research: Rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6 · 2016 · External reference
Predicting the objective and subjective clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A machine learning analysis of 432 patients
10.1177/03635465221129870 · 2022 · External reference
Application of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically meaningful improvement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
10.1177/23259671211046575 · 2021 · External reference
Preoperative short form health survey score is predictive of return to play and minimal clinically important difference at a minimum 2‐year follow‐up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
10.1177/0363546517714472 · 2017 · External reference
Meaningful change scores in the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
10.1177/0363546518759543 · 2018 · External reference
Establishing threshold values for the patient acceptable symptom state after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for the self knee value and the anterior cruciate ligament‐return to sport after injury scale
10.1177/23259671251343073 · 2025 · External reference
Patient acceptable symptom state thresholds for IKDC‐SKF and KOOS at the 10‐year follow‐up after anterior cruciate ligament injury: A study from the Delaware‐Oslo ACL cohort
10.1177/23259671241250025 · 2024 · External reference
Impact of sports participation on achievement of clinically relevant outcomes 2 years after ACL reconstruction
10.1177/23259671231187327 · 2023 · External reference
Cutoff value for the patient acceptable symptom state of the Thai IKDC subjective knee form in patients after primary ACL reconstruction
10.1177/23259671221113880 · 2022 · External reference
Defining thresholds for the patient acceptable symptom state for the IKDC subjective knee form and KOOS for patients who underwent ACL reconstruction
10.1177/0363546516652888 · 2016 · External reference
The minimally clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A time‐to‐achievement analysis
10.3928/01477447-20210819-03 · 2021 · External reference
Determining the substantial clinical benefit values for patient‐reported outcome scores after primary ACL reconstruction
2022 · External reference
Are orthopaedic clinical trials linguistically and culturally diverse? A systematic review
10.2106/jbjs.rvw.24.00012 · 2024 · External reference