Research graph
References from The right measure for the right question: A framework for domain‐matched patient‐reported outcome measure selection in knee arthroplasty research. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty
10.2106/00004623-198466020-00010 · 1984 · External reference
Partial versus total knee arthroplasty for isolated antero‐medial osteoarthritis: an analysis of PROMs and satisfaction
10.1051/sicotj/2023006 · 2023 · External reference
Recovery plateaus and ceiling effects of commonly used patient‐reported outcome measures following primary total knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2026.03.052 · 2026 · External reference
The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035 · 2012 · External reference
Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee
1988 · External reference
A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty
10.1302/2633-1462.45.bjo-2022-0157.r1 · 2023 · External reference
The short form KOOS, JR is valid for revision knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.016 · 2020 · External reference
The patient‐reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self‐reported health outcome item banks: 2005‐2008
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · 2010 · External reference
The Oxford Knee Score is a reliable predictor of patients in a health state worse than death and awaiting total knee arthroplasty
10.1186/s42836-022-00132-9 · 2022 · External reference
Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?
10.1302/0301-620x.106b10.bjj-2024-0876 · 2024 · External reference
Are modern knee outcomes scores appropriate for evaluating anterior knee pain and symptoms after total knee arthroplasty?
10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103292 · 2022 · External reference
Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure of activity and participation (the OKS‐APQ) to supplement the Oxford knee score
10.1302/0301-620x.96b3.32845 · 2014 · External reference
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement
10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.0800063 · 1998 · External reference
The KOOS‐12 shortform shows no ceiling effect, good responsiveness and construct validity compared to standard outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty
10.1007/s00167-020-05904-x · 2021 · External reference
The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the different calculation methods
10.1177/03635465231152484 · 2023 · External reference
A 12‐item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS‐12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness
10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.011 · 2019 · External reference
Anterior knee pain and evidence of osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint should not be considered contraindications to mobile‐bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15‐year follow‐up
10.1302/0301-620x.99b5.bjj-2016-0695.r2 · 2017 · External reference
10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00136
10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00136 · External reference
Experimental development of the graphic rating method
1921 · External reference
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system
10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004 · 1989 · External reference
Dutch translation of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty
10.1007/s00167-013-2635-4 · 2013 · External reference
Patient‐reported outcome measures: it is time for authors, reviewers, journal editors and health care strategists to take sufficient responsibility
10.1007/s00167-022-07138-5 · 2022 · External reference
Scoring of patellofemoral disorders
10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80366-4 · 1993 · External reference
Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: is it really useful?
10.1186/s43019-020-00049-0 · 2020 · External reference
Limitations of the knee society score in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty
10.1002/jeo2.12054 · 2024 · External reference
Which PROM should be used to address the right domain of interest after ACL‐R: a comprehensive review
10.1007/s43465-025-01688-9 · 2026 · External reference
Development of a scale to assess performance following primary total knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.006 · 2014 · External reference
Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items
10.1302/0301-620x.95b2.28383 · 2013 · External reference
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the forgotten joint score
10.3390/medicina57040324 · 2021 · External reference
Not all questions are created equal: the weight of the Oxford Knee Scores questions in a multicentric validation study
10.1186/s10195-023-00722-6 · 2023 · External reference
Validation of the KOOS, JR: a short‐form knee arthroplasty outcomes survey
10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1 · 2016 · External reference
MCID and PASS in knee surgeries. Theoretical aspects and clinical relevance references
10.1007/s00167-023-07359-2 · 2023 · External reference
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient‐reported outcome measures version 2.0
10.1007/s11136-024-03761-6 · 2024 · External reference
Robotic‐assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of alignment accuracy and clinical outcomes
10.1097/ms9.0000000000002919 · 2025 · External reference
Development of a new Knee Society scoring system
10.1007/s11999-011-2152-z · 2012 · External reference
Clinical cut‐offs for hip‐ and knee arthroplasty outcome ‐ minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROM)
10.1007/s11136-025-03896-0 · 2025 · External reference
The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS‐Physical Function Shortform (KOOS‐PS)—an OARSI/OMERACT initiative
10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.014 · 2008 · External reference
EQ‐SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
10.3109/07853890109002087 · 2001 · External reference
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self‐administered outcome measure
10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88 · 1998 · External reference
Clinical outcomes of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
10.1302/2058-5241.5.190093 · 2020 · External reference
Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS‐10 Global Health and EQ‐5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
10.1302/0301-620x.101b7.bjj-2018-1543.r1 · 2019 · External reference
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for total joint arthroplasty outcome measures varies substantially by calculation method
10.2106/jbjs.24.00916 · 2025 · External reference
Patient‐reported outcome measures offer little additional value two years after arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
10.1302/0301-620x.107b3.bjj-2024-0910.r1 · 2025 · External reference
Use of a new high‐activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.019 · 2010 · External reference
Translation, cross‐cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Dutch Oxford Knee Score ‐ Activity and Participation Questionnaire
10.1186/s12891-021-04521-0 · 2021 · External reference
Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty
10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934 · 2016 · External reference
The sensitivity of patient‐reported outcome measures in surgical and non‐surgical care: a systematic review and meta‐epidemiological evaluation of randomised controlled trials
10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103776 · 2026 · External reference
Utility of PROM questionnaires: correlation of question burden and response rate among surgically treated patients with musculoskeletal diseases
10.3390/jcm14196728 · 2025 · External reference
The German version of the High‐Activity Arthroplasty Score is valid and reliable for patients after total knee arthroplasty
10.1007/s00167-021-06531-w · 2022 · External reference
Patient‐reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
10.1302/2046-3758.103.bjr-2020-0268.r1 · 2021 · External reference
A 12‐item short‐form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity
10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · 1996 · External reference
The MOS 36‐ltem short‐form health survey (SF‐36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection
10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · 1992 · External reference
Limitations of the knee society score in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty
10.1002/jeo2.12054 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Dutch translation of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty
10.1007/s00167-013-2635-4 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The KOOS‐12 shortform shows no ceiling effect, good responsiveness and construct validity compared to standard outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty
10.1007/s00167-020-05904-x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The German version of the High‐Activity Arthroplasty Score is valid and reliable for patients after total knee arthroplasty
10.1007/s00167-021-06531-w · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Patient‐reported outcome measures: it is time for authors, reviewers, journal editors and health care strategists to take sufficient responsibility
10.1007/s00167-022-07138-5 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
MCID and PASS in knee surgeries. Theoretical aspects and clinical relevance references
10.1007/s00167-023-07359-2 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient‐reported outcome measures version 2.0
10.1007/s11136-024-03761-6 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Clinical cut‐offs for hip‐ and knee arthroplasty outcome ‐ minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROM)
10.1007/s11136-025-03896-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Development of a new Knee Society scoring system
10.1007/s11999-011-2152-z · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Validation of the KOOS, JR: a short‐form knee arthroplasty outcomes survey
10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Which PROM should be used to address the right domain of interest after ACL‐R: a comprehensive review
10.1007/s43465-025-01688-9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Use of a new high‐activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.019 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The short form KOOS, JR is valid for revision knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.016 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Recovery plateaus and ceiling effects of commonly used patient‐reported outcome measures following primary total knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2026.03.052 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The sensitivity of patient‐reported outcome measures in surgical and non‐surgical care: a systematic review and meta‐epidemiological evaluation of randomised controlled trials
10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103776 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The patient‐reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self‐reported health outcome item banks: 2005‐2008
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS‐Physical Function Shortform (KOOS‐PS)—an OARSI/OMERACT initiative
10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.014 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A 12‐item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS‐12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness
10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.011 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Development of a scale to assess performance following primary total knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.006 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Are modern knee outcomes scores appropriate for evaluating anterior knee pain and symptoms after total knee arthroplasty?
10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103292 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Scoring of patellofemoral disorders
10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80366-4 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Partial versus total knee arthroplasty for isolated antero‐medial osteoarthritis: an analysis of PROMs and satisfaction
10.1051/sicotj/2023006 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system
10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The MOS 36‐ltem short‐form health survey (SF‐36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection
10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A 12‐item short‐form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity
10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Robotic‐assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of alignment accuracy and clinical outcomes
10.1097/ms9.0000000000002919 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the different calculation methods
10.1177/03635465231152484 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Not all questions are created equal: the weight of the Oxford Knee Scores questions in a multicentric validation study
10.1186/s10195-023-00722-6 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Translation, cross‐cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Dutch Oxford Knee Score ‐ Activity and Participation Questionnaire
10.1186/s12891-021-04521-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The Oxford Knee Score is a reliable predictor of patients in a health state worse than death and awaiting total knee arthroplasty
10.1186/s42836-022-00132-9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: is it really useful?
10.1186/s43019-020-00049-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS‐10 Global Health and EQ‐5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
10.1302/0301-620x.101b7.bjj-2018-1543.r1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose?
10.1302/0301-620x.106b10.bjj-2024-0876 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Patient‐reported outcome measures offer little additional value two years after arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
10.1302/0301-620x.107b3.bjj-2024-0910.r1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement
10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.0800063 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items
10.1302/0301-620x.95b2.28383 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure of activity and participation (the OKS‐APQ) to supplement the Oxford knee score
10.1302/0301-620x.96b3.32845 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Anterior knee pain and evidence of osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint should not be considered contraindications to mobile‐bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15‐year follow‐up
10.1302/0301-620x.99b5.bjj-2016-0695.r2 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Patient‐reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
10.1302/2046-3758.103.bjr-2020-0268.r1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Clinical outcomes of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
10.1302/2058-5241.5.190093 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty
10.1302/2633-1462.45.bjo-2022-0157.r1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty
10.2106/00004623-198466020-00010 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for total joint arthroplasty outcome measures varies substantially by calculation method
10.2106/jbjs.24.00916 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self‐administered outcome measure
10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
EQ‐SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
10.3109/07853890109002087 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty
10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Utility of PROM questionnaires: correlation of question burden and response rate among surgically treated patients with musculoskeletal diseases
10.3390/jcm14196728 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the forgotten joint score
10.3390/medicina57040324 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00136
10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00136 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
