Research graph
References from A novel integrated circular radiography (ICRAD) phantom for evaluating non‐uniform image quality metrics in radiography. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography .6. Mtfs of Ii‐Tv digital imaging‐systems
10.1118/1.595653 · 1985 · External reference
Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography .3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast
10.1118/1.595708 · 1985 · External reference
Method for determining the point spread function for a digital radiography system
10.1007/s10512-020-00628-0 · 2020 · External reference
Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems
10.1148/radiol.2492071734 · 2008 · External reference
Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography
10.1007/s00330-003-1971-z · 2004 · External reference
Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast‐detail phantom
2001 · External reference
Correlation of contrast‐detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study
10.1148/radiol.11110447 · 2012 · External reference
Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging—Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom
10.1002/acm2.12649 · 2019 · External reference
Anode heel effect: does it impact image quality in digital radiography? A systematic literature review
10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.014 · 2021 · External reference
Evaluation of CDRAD and TO20 test objects and associated software in digital radiography
10.1088/2057-1976/ab285b · 2019 · External reference
Evaluation of non‐uniform image quality caused by anode heel effect in digital radiography using mutual information
10.3390/e23050525 · 2021 · External reference
Comparison of non‐uniform image quality caused by anode heel effect between two digital radiographic systems using a circular step‐wedge phantom and mutual information
10.3390/e24121781 · 2022 · External reference
Mutual information‐based evaluation of image quality with its preliminary application to assessment of medical imaging systems
10.1117/1.3206967 · 2009 · External reference
The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale
10.1364/josa.38.000196 · 1948 · External reference
The Rose model, revisited
10.1364/josaa.16.000633 · 1999 · External reference
Information entropy measure for evaluation of image quality
10.1007/s10278-007-9044-5 · 2008 · External reference
A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device
10.1118/1.598165 · 1998 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
2011 · External reference
Effects of x‐ray tube current and voltage on effective focalspot size
10.1118/1.1637286 · 1974 · External reference
Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging—Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom
10.1002/acm2.12649 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography
10.1007/s00330-003-1971-z · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Information entropy measure for evaluation of image quality
10.1007/s10278-007-9044-5 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Method for determining the point spread function for a digital radiography system
10.1007/s10512-020-00628-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Anode heel effect: does it impact image quality in digital radiography? A systematic literature review
10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.014 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Evaluation of CDRAD and TO20 test objects and associated software in digital radiography
10.1088/2057-1976/ab285b · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Mutual information‐based evaluation of image quality with its preliminary application to assessment of medical imaging systems
10.1117/1.3206967 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Effects of x‐ray tube current and voltage on effective focalspot size
10.1118/1.1637286 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography .6. Mtfs of Ii‐Tv digital imaging‐systems
10.1118/1.595653 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography .3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast
10.1118/1.595708 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device
10.1118/1.598165 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Correlation of contrast‐detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study
10.1148/radiol.11110447 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems
10.1148/radiol.2492071734 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale
10.1364/josa.38.000196 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The Rose model, revisited
10.1364/josaa.16.000633 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Evaluation of non‐uniform image quality caused by anode heel effect in digital radiography using mutual information
10.3390/e23050525 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of non‐uniform image quality caused by anode heel effect between two digital radiographic systems using a circular step‐wedge phantom and mutual information
10.3390/e24121781 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
