Research graph
References from Intuitions of compromise: Utilitarianism, egalitarianism, contractualism. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001
10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001 · 2019 · External reference
Evolutionary explanations of distributive justice
10.1086/392792 · 2000 · External reference
How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs?
10.1007/s10683-013-9352-1 · 2013 · External reference
Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution
10.1007/s00355-010-0499-9 · 2011 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2022 · External reference
The moral machine experiment
10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 · 2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2022 · External reference
Judgments of distributive justice
10.1017/cbo9780511552069.005 · 1993 · External reference
Need, equity and accountability: Evidence on third-party distribution decisions from a vignette study
10.1007/s00355-022-01410-w · 2022 · External reference
Trading goods versus sharing money: An experiment testing whether fairness and efficiency are frame dependent
10.1037/h0091585 · 2008 · External reference
Egalitarianism versus utilitarianism
10.1017/s0953820800006269 · 1998 · External reference
Focal points and bargaining
10.1007/bf01240133 · 1993 · External reference
10.1145/3033274.3085143
10.1145/3033274.3085143 · External reference
A game theoretic account of social justice
10.1007/bf00126380 · 1979 · External reference
The impact of entitlements and equity on cooperative bargaining: An experiment
10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00391.x · 2012 · External reference
Decisions behind the veil: An experimental approach
2018 · External reference
Nash, bargaining and evolution
10.1086/715778 · 2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2013 · External reference
Understanding social preferences with simple tests*
10.1162/003355302760193904 · 2002 · External reference
A just approach balancing rawlsian leximax fairness and utilitarianism
10.1145/3375627.3375844 · 2020 · External reference
Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods
10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080 · 1984 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Different visualizations cause different strategies when dealing with Bayesian situations
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01897 · 2020 · External reference
Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments
10.1257/0002828042002741 · 2004 · External reference
Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment
10.1257/aer.96.5.1912 · 2006 · External reference
A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation
10.1162/003355399556151 · 1999 · External reference
The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – experimental evidence and new theories
10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01008-6 · 2006 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1992 · External reference
Laboratory results on rawls’s distributive justice
10.1017/s0007123400004580 · 1987 · External reference
Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
10.1007/s00355-006-0141-z · 2006 · External reference
10.1017/cbo9781139012867
10.1017/cbo9781139012867 · 2011 · External reference
How to be helpful to multiple people at once
10.1111/cogs.12841 · 2020 · External reference
Jury learning: Integrating dissenting voices into machine learning models
10.1145/3491102.3502004 · 2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2019 · External reference
A bargaining-theoretic approach to moral uncertainty
2023 · External reference
Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking
10.1086/257416 · 1953 · External reference
Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility
10.1086/257678 · 1955 · External reference
Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of john rawls’s theory
10.2307/1959090 · 1975 · External reference
Game and decision theoretic models in ethics
10.1016/s1574-0005(05)80022-0 · 1992 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1988 · External reference
Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: a systematic analysis
10.1007/s00182-017-0588-4 · 2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
2013 · External reference
The Nash social welfare function
10.2307/1914191 · 1979 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories
10.1257/002205103771800013 · 2003 · External reference
Bargaining power does not matter when sharing losses – Experimental evidence of equal split in the Nash bargaining game
10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.009 · 2014 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2000 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1957 · External reference
Normative uncertainty as a voting problem
10.1093/mind/fzv169 · 2016 · External reference
Why maximize expected choice-worthiness?
10.1111/nous.12264 · 2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Value pluralism
2023 · External reference
Improving Nash social welfare approximations
10.1613/jair.1.11618 · 2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2003 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1995 · External reference
The bargaining problem
10.2307/1907266 · 1950 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1947 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1995 · External reference
Political equality, plural voting, and the leveling down objection
10.1177/1470594x221087470 · 2022 · External reference
The ergodicity problem in economics
10.1038/s41567-019-0732-0 · 2019 · External reference
The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian
10.1007/s11238-014-9477-5 · 2015 · External reference
Egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and the Nash bargaining solution
10.1007/s00355-018-01170-6 · 2019 · External reference
The Nash bargaining solution: sometimes more utilitarian, sometimes more egalitarian
10.1007/s11238-023-09930-2 · 2023 · External reference
Nash social welfare in multiagent resource allocation
10.1007/978-3-642-15117-0_9 · 2010 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1971 · External reference
A theory of the calculus of voting
10.2307/1953324 · 1968 · External reference
Rejecting ethical deflationism
10.1086/505234 · 2006 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Empirical research on ethical preferences: How popular is prioritarianism?
10.2139/ssrn.3766216 · 2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2018 · External reference
What to do when you don’t know what to do when you don’t know what to do…
10.1111/nous.12010 · 2014 · External reference
Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction
10.1023/a:1013180410169 · 2002 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2012 · External reference
Vive la différence? Structural diversity as a challenge for metanormative theories
10.1086/711204 · 2021 · External reference
Nash’s bargaining solution and utilitarian choice rules
10.2307/1913329 · 1981 · External reference
In what sense is the Nash solution fair?
10.1007/0-387-25706-3_2 · 2005 · External reference
Resource-rational virtual bargaining for moral judgment: Towards a probabilistic cognitive model
2024 · External reference
Intransitivity of preferences
10.1037/h0026750 · 1969 · External reference
Rawls, edgeworth, shapley, nash: Theories of distributive justice re-examined
10.1016/0022-0531(81)90062-4 · 1981 · External reference
On dividing justly
10.1007/bf00297056 · 1984 · External reference
Modeling household relocation choice: An egalitarian bargaining approach and a comparative study
10.5198/jtlu.2021.1733 · 2021 · External reference
An evolutionary model of bargaining
10.1006/jeth.1993.1009 · 1993 · External reference
10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00913
10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00913 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2013 · External reference
An evolutionary model of bargaining
10.1006/jeth.1993.1009 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
In what sense is the Nash solution fair?
10.1007/0-387-25706-3_2 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Nash social welfare in multiagent resource allocation
10.1007/978-3-642-15117-0_9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A game theoretic account of social justice
10.1007/bf00126380 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
On dividing justly
10.1007/bf00297056 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Focal points and bargaining
10.1007/bf01240133 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: a systematic analysis
10.1007/s00182-017-0588-4 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims
10.1007/s00355-006-0141-z · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution
10.1007/s00355-010-0499-9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and the Nash bargaining solution
10.1007/s00355-018-01170-6 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Need, equity and accountability: Evidence on third-party distribution decisions from a vignette study
10.1007/s00355-022-01410-w · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs?
10.1007/s10683-013-9352-1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian
10.1007/s11238-014-9477-5 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The Nash bargaining solution: sometimes more utilitarian, sometimes more egalitarian
10.1007/s11238-023-09930-2 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Rawls, edgeworth, shapley, nash: Theories of distributive justice re-examined
10.1016/0022-0531(81)90062-4 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Bargaining power does not matter when sharing losses – Experimental evidence of equal split in the Nash bargaining game
10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.009 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Game and decision theoretic models in ethics
10.1016/s1574-0005(05)80022-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – experimental evidence and new theories
10.1016/s1574-0714(06)01008-6 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Judgments of distributive justice
10.1017/cbo9780511552069.005 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1017/cbo9781139012867
10.1017/cbo9781139012867 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Laboratory results on rawls’s distributive justice
10.1017/s0007123400004580 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Egalitarianism versus utilitarianism
10.1017/s0953820800006269 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction
10.1023/a:1013180410169 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Intransitivity of preferences
10.1037/h0026750 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Trading goods versus sharing money: An experiment testing whether fairness and efficiency are frame dependent
10.1037/h0091585 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The ergodicity problem in economics
10.1038/s41567-019-0732-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The moral machine experiment
10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods
10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking
10.1086/257416 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility
10.1086/257678 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Evolutionary explanations of distributive justice
10.1086/392792 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Rejecting ethical deflationism
10.1086/505234 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Vive la différence? Structural diversity as a challenge for metanormative theories
10.1086/711204 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Nash, bargaining and evolution
10.1086/715778 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Normative uncertainty as a voting problem
10.1093/mind/fzv169 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001
10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00913
10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00913 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
How to be helpful to multiple people at once
10.1111/cogs.12841 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The impact of entitlements and equity on cooperative bargaining: An experiment
10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00391.x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
What to do when you don’t know what to do when you don’t know what to do…
10.1111/nous.12010 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Why maximize expected choice-worthiness?
10.1111/nous.12264 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1145/3033274.3085143
10.1145/3033274.3085143 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A just approach balancing rawlsian leximax fairness and utilitarianism
10.1145/3375627.3375844 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Jury learning: Integrating dissenting voices into machine learning models
10.1145/3491102.3502004 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Understanding social preferences with simple tests*
10.1162/003355302760193904 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation
10.1162/003355399556151 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Political equality, plural voting, and the leveling down objection
10.1177/1470594x221087470 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments
10.1257/0002828042002741 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories
10.1257/002205103771800013 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment
10.1257/aer.96.5.1912 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Improving Nash social welfare approximations
10.1613/jair.1.11618 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Empirical research on ethical preferences: How popular is prioritarianism?
10.2139/ssrn.3766216 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The bargaining problem
10.2307/1907266 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Nash’s bargaining solution and utilitarian choice rules
10.2307/1913329 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The Nash social welfare function
10.2307/1914191 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A theory of the calculus of voting
10.2307/1953324 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of john rawls’s theory
10.2307/1959090 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Different visualizations cause different strategies when dealing with Bayesian situations
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01897 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Modeling household relocation choice: An egalitarian bargaining approach and a comparative study
10.5198/jtlu.2021.1733 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
