Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureResearch graph
References from Did Dobbs impact access to and use of preferred contraception and related outcomes?: Quasi-experimental evidence from three states in the US. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Has the fall of Roe changed contraceptive access and use? New research from four US states offers critical insights
2024 · External reference
Use of oral and emergency contraceptives after the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620 · 2024 · External reference
Increases in retail sales of over-the-counter levonorgestrel emergency contraception in the United States, 2016–2022
10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110420 · 2024 · External reference
Changes in permanent contraception procedures among young adults following the Dobbs decision
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0424 · 2024 · External reference
Permanent and long-acting reversible contraception volumes at a multihospital system in Ohio before and after Dobbs
10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110471 · 2024 · External reference
Tubal sterilization rates by state abortion laws after the Dobbs decision
10.1001/jama.2024.16862 · 2024 · External reference
Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade
10.1038/s41443-024-00905-7 · 2024 · External reference
A nationwide assessment of permanent contraception trends in relation to changes in abortion laws
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.722 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
The impact of coronavirus on reproduction: Contraceptive access, pregnancy rates, pregnancy delay, and the role of vaccination
2022 · External reference
Measuring the relationship between the 2019 Title X Final Rule and patients’ sexual and reproductive health care access and behavior in Iowa using a difference-in-difference approach
10.1007/s13178-023-00876-2 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2022 · External reference
Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin
10.1111/1475-6773.14297 · 2024 · External reference
Meeting preferences for specific contraceptive methods: An overdue indicator
10.1111/sifp.12218 · 2023 · External reference
Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: A population-based study
2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio
10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.006 · 2021 · External reference
Exploring financial stress and resource deprivation as barriers to preferred contraceptive use in Wisconsin in 2021
10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.014 · 2022 · External reference
Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States
10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x · 2024 · External reference
Contraception usage and workforce trends through 2022
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6044 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Design and implementation of the Surveys of Women: Protocol for an address-based sampling multimodal study
2023 · External reference
Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100532 · 2025 · External reference
US Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy: Which Frameworks Are Needed Now, and Next Steps Forward
10.2105/ajph.2022.306929 · 2022 · External reference
Over-the-counter emergency contraceptive sales before and after Dobbs: a difference-in-difference analysis of US retail data
2026 · External reference
Contraceptive use and unfulfilled preferences among women ages 15–49 years in the United States, 2022–2023
2026 · External reference
Tubal Sterilization And Vasectomy Increased Among US Young Adults After The Dobbs Supreme Court Decision In 2022
2025 · External reference
Changes in female permanent contraception at academic medical centers following the Dobbs decision
10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111210 · 2026 · External reference
Impact of the Dobbs decision on contraceptive provision: A qualitative study
2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
