Research graph
References from The accuracy of stereophotogrammetric, intraoral scanning, and conventional open-tray impression techniques for complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Treatment planning the edentulous mandible. Review of biomechanical and clinical considerations: an update
10.11607/jomi.7196 · 2019 · External reference
The all-on-four treatment concept: systematic review
2017 · External reference
Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept
10.1186/s12903-022-02520-8 · 2022 · External reference
Prosthodontic perspective to All- On-4 ® concept for dental implants
2014 · External reference
Implant framework misfit: a systematic review on assessment methods and clinical complications
10.1111/cid.12968 · 2021 · External reference
Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature
2017 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Digital Vs conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
10.1111/jopr.13211 · 2020 · External reference
Conventional versus digital impressions for “All-on-Four” restorations
10.11607/jomi.3900 · 2016 · External reference
Conventional and digital impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: time, implant quantity effect and patient satisfaction
10.4047/jap.2022.14.4.212 · 2022 · External reference
Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression
10.1155/2017/8427595 · 2017 · External reference
Effect of implant scan body type, intraoral scanner and scan strategy on the accuracy and scanning time of a maxillary complete arch implant scans: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105782 · 2025 · External reference
Accuracy of full-arch intraoral scans versus conventional impression: a systematic review with a meta-analysis and a proposal to standardise the analysis of the accuracy
10.3390/jcm14010071 · 2024 · External reference
Stereophotogrammetry for recording the position of multiple implants: technical description
10.11607/ijp.4146 · 2015 · External reference
Photogrammetry technology in implant dentistry: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.015 · 2023 · External reference
Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.006 · 2022 · External reference
Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: an in vitro study
10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_22_00251 · 2024 · External reference
Accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry versus direct digital implant impressions in the fully edentulous lower jaw: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105654 · 2025 · External reference
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005 · 2021 · External reference
Effect of angulation between multi-unit abutments on trueness of photogrammetry systems
10.1111/jopr.14074 · 2025 · External reference
Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.019 · 2023 · External reference
Comparative evaluation of open tray impression technique: investigating the precision of four splinting materials in multiple implants
10.1186/s12903-023-03583-x · 2023 · External reference
Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02219.x · 2012 · External reference
Accuracy of photogrammetric imaging versus conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative clinical study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.035 · 2021 · External reference
In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses
10.3390/jcm11030594 · 2022 · External reference
Stereo-photogrammetry for impression of full-arch fixed dental prosthesis—an update of the reviews
10.3390/prosthesis6040068 · 2024 · External reference
Trueness and precision of mandibular complete-arch implant scans when different data acquisition methods are used
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104700 · 2023 · External reference
Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.008 · 2024 · External reference
Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant‐supported mandibular complete arch‐fixed prosthesis: an in vitro study
10.1111/jopr.13604 · 2023 · External reference
Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: an in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry
10.1111/clr.14252 · 2024 · External reference
Linear accuracy of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions of implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2023 · External reference
Accuracy of implant abutment level digital impressions using stereophotogrammetry in edentulous jaws: an in vitro pilot study
10.1186/s12903-024-04888-1 · 2024 · External reference
Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An in vitro study
10.4103/jips.jips_52_22 · 2022 · External reference
Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the Scan accuracy of edentulous arches: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.027 · 2024 · External reference
Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner
10.1111/jopr.13135 · 2020 · External reference
Factors affecting trueness of intraoral scans: an update
10.3390/app12136675 · 2022 · External reference
Enhancing scanning accuracy of digital implant scans: a systematic review on application methods of scan bodies
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.010 · 2024 · External reference
Implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses manufactured through a direct digital workflow using a calibrated splinting framework: a retrospective clinical study
10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105605 · 2025 · External reference
Multi-unit implant impression accuracy: a review of the literature
2014 · External reference
Accuracy of 3 different impression techniques for internal connection angulated implants
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.005 · 2015 · External reference
The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of External- and internal-connection implants
2012 · External reference
A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: part 2—Patient factors
10.1111/jerd.12993 · 2023 · External reference
Best-fit algorithm influences on virtual casts' alignment discrepancies
10.1111/jopr.13537 · 2023 · External reference
Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review
2021 · External reference
