Research graph
References from Digital Evidence Certainty Descriptors (DECDs). Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
The LR does not exist
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.06.005 · 2016 · External reference
Error, uncertainty, and loss in digital evidence
2002 · External reference
Clearly conveying digital forensic results
10.1016/j.diin.2018.03.001 · 2018 · External reference
Admitting to uncertainty in the LR
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.005 · 2016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2015 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Framework for Reliable Experimental Design (FRED): a research framework to ensure the dependable interpretation of digital data for digital forensics
10.1016/j.cose.2017.11.009 · 2018 · External reference
Formalising investigative decision making in digital forensics: proposing the digital evidence reporting and decision support (DERDS) framework
10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.007 · 2019 · External reference
Raiders of the lost artefacts: championing the need for digital forensics research
2019 · External reference
A case-based reasoning method for locating evidence during digital forensic device triage
10.1016/j.dss.2014.01.007 · 2014 · External reference
Forensic scientists' conclusions: how readable are they for non-scientist report-users?
10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.026 · 2013 · External reference
Likelihood ratio as weight of forensic evidence: a closer look
2017 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1964 · External reference
January. Reasoning about evidence using Bayesian networks
2008 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2008 · External reference
The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect
10.1037/lhb0000027 · 2013 · External reference
The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfindershear
10.1007/s10979-008-9169-1 · 2009 · External reference
Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems
10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.002 · 2011 · External reference
What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.007 · 2016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
2009 · External reference
The likelihood ratio as value of evidence—more than a question of numbers
10.1093/lpr/mgs019 · 2012 · External reference
Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence
10.1093/lpr/mgr020 · 2011 · External reference
An argument against presenting interval quantifications as a surrogate for the value of evidence
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.07.001 · 2016 · External reference
Quantifying likelihood in digital forensic investigations
2014 · External reference
November. Quantification of digital Forensic hypotheses using probability theory
2013 · External reference
November. How to be a digital forensic expert witness
2005 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Rules of professional responsibility in digital forensics: a comparative analysis
2015 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2013 · External reference
Meetings between experts: a route to simpler, fairer trials?
10.1016/j.diin.2008.11.002 · 2009 · External reference
Certification, registration and assessment of digital forensic experts: the UK experience
10.1016/j.diin.2011.06.001 · 2011 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2018 · External reference
Discussion paper: hard cases make bad law:Reactions to R v. T
10.1093/lpr/mgs020 · 2012 · External reference
Lay understanding of forensic statistics: evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents
10.1037/lhb0000134 · 2015 · External reference
