Research graph
References from Quality standards for digital forensics: Learning from experience in England & Wales. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Cutting corners: trading Justice for cost savings
10.1016/j.diin.2006.10.006 · 2006 · External reference
Differentiating the phases of digital investigations
10.1016/j.diin.2016.11.001 · 2016 · External reference
The checkered past and risky future of digital forensics
10.1080/00450618.2018.1554090 · 2019 · External reference
Making sense of digital forensic standards
2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2015 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
2009 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Rethinking digital forensics
10.33166/aetic.2019.02.005 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2016 · External reference
Requirement in digital forensics method definition; observations from a UK study
10.1016/j.diin.2018.09.004 · 2018 · External reference
A review of quality procedures in the UK forensic sciences: what can the field of digital forensics learn?
10.1016/j.scijus.2018.09.006 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2016 · External reference
Accrediting digital forensics: what are the choices?
10.1016/j.diin.2018.04.004 · 2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2019 · External reference
Commentary on: Hak. Evaluation of the Forensic Science Regulator's recommendations regarding image comparison evidence
2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2019 · External reference
Forensic science, reliability and scientific validity: advice from America
2017 · External reference
