Research graph
References from Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Unresolved reference
2009 · External reference
Forensic science assessments: A quality and gap analysis - latent fingerprint examination
2017 · External reference
Perceived strength of forensic scientists' reporting statements about source conclusions
10.1093/lpr/mgy012 · 2018 · External reference
Communicating statistical DNA evidence
2003 · External reference
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions
10.1073/pnas.1018707108 · 2011 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1996 · External reference
The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear
10.1007/s10979-008-9169-1 · 2009 · External reference
How I got started: teaching physicians and judges risk literacy
10.1002/acp.2980 · 2014 · External reference
Communicating the results of forensic science examinations
2015 · External reference
Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours
10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380 · 2001 · External reference
Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics
10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x · 2007 · External reference
A 30% chance of rain tomorrow": how does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts?
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00608.x · 2005 · External reference
Can jurors understand probabilistic evidence?
10.2307/2982696 · 1991 · External reference
The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions
10.1080/00450618.2013.784361 · 2013 · External reference
The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect
10.1037/lhb0000027 · 2013 · External reference
A verbal scale for the interpretation of evidence
10.1016/s1355-0306(98)72128-8 · 1998 · External reference
Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
10.1016/j.scijus.2009.07.004 · 2009 · External reference
Perception problems of the verbal scale
10.1016/j.scijus.2013.10.004 · 2014 · External reference
Perception problems of the verbal scale: a reanalysis and application of a membership function approach
10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01.002 · 2015 · External reference
Understanding forensic expert evaluative evidence: a study of the perception of verbal expressions of the strength of evidence
10.1016/j.scijus.2017.02.002 · 2017 · External reference
Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy
10.1037/a0031849 · 2013 · External reference
Interpretation of conventional and ‘bayesian’ verbal scales for expressing expert opinion: a small experiment among jurists
1999 · External reference
Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.009 · 2016 · External reference
Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms
10.3758/bf03334162 · 1993 · External reference
Verbal probabilities: ambiguous, context-dependent, or both?
10.1016/0749-5978(88)90036-2 · 1988 · External reference
Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions
10.1016/0749-596x(86)90012-4 · 1986 · External reference
Tackling ‘legalese’: how linguistics can simplify legal language and increase access to justice
2014 · External reference
Yes, but it is uncertain: direction and communicative intention of verbal probabilistic terms
10.1016/0001-6918(93)e0071-9 · 1995 · External reference
The directionality of verbal probability expressions: effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning
10.1006/obhd.1999.2857 · 1999 · External reference
Likelihood ratio as weight of forensic evidence: a closer look
2017 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2015 · External reference
A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: a closer look” by Lund and Iyer
10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.025 · 2018 · External reference
The LR does not exist
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.06.005 · 2016 · External reference
Reframing the debate: a question of probability, not of likelihood ratio
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.008 · 2016 · External reference
On the likelihood of "encapsulating all uncertainty
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.10.004 · 2017 · External reference
The role of prior probability in forensic assessments
2013 · External reference
On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: presentation formats and the weak evidence effect
10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.005 · 2014 · External reference
When good evidence goes bad: the weak evidence effect in judgment and decision-making
10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.013 · 2011 · External reference
Distinguishing the ratio bias from unsystematic error: situation and individual-difference effects
10.1002/bdm.2068 · 2018 · External reference
Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials - the Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Defense Attorney's Fallacy
10.1007/bf01044641 · 1987 · External reference
Understanding ‘unlikely (20% likelihood)’ or ‘20% likelihood (unlikely)’ outcomes: the robustness of the extremity effect
10.1002/bdm.2072 · 2018 · External reference
Patterns of preference for numerical and verbal probabilities
10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199706)10:2<117::aid-bdm251>3.0.co;2-7 · 1997 · External reference
Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility
10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.07.030 · 2018 · External reference
The role of context in the communication of uncertain beliefs
10.1207/s15324834basp2001_6 · 1998 · External reference
Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change
1986 · External reference
Science, technology, or the expert witness: what influences jurors' judgments about forensic science testimony?
10.1037/law0000103 · 2016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1997 · External reference
Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom
2009 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1982 · External reference
There is a 60% probability, but I am 70% certain: communicative consequences of external and internal expressions of uncertainty
10.1080/13546783.2015.1069758 · 2015 · External reference
Lay understanding of forensic statistics: evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents
10.1037/lhb0000134 · 2015 · External reference
Educating jurors about forensic evidence: using an expert witness and judicial instructions to mitigate the impact of invalid forensic science testimony
10.1111/1556-4029.12832 · 2015 · External reference
How jurors evaluate fingerprint evidence: the relative importance of match language, method information, and error acknowledgment
10.1111/jels.12017 · 2013 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2016 · External reference
Communicating forensic evidence: lessons from psychological science
2018 · External reference
Just a juror's perception
2018 · External reference
