Research graph
References from The dissemination of brain imaging guidelines and recommendations. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams
10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9 · 2020 · External reference
Sources of information on specific subjects
1934 · External reference
The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004 · 2012 · External reference
Better living through transparency: improving the reproducibility of fMRI results through comprehensive methods reporting
10.3758/s13415-013-0188-0 · 2013 · External reference
Functional lateralization of human gustatory cortex related to handedness disclosed by fMRI study
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10627.x · 1998 · External reference
Why public dissemination of science matters: a manifesto
10.1523/jneurosci.2556-13.2013 · 2013 · External reference
Human taste cortical areas studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: evidence of functional lateralization related to handedness
10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00881-2 · 1999 · External reference
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: how do these two social media metrics differ?
2014 · External reference
Dissemination does not equal public engagement
10.1523/jneurosci.4408-14.2015 · 2015 · External reference
Citation analysis of the Korean journal of urology from Web of science, Scopus, Korean medical citation index, KoreaMed synapse, and Google scholar
10.4111/kju.2013.54.4.220 · 2013 · External reference
Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research
10.1038/nrn2773 · 2010 · External reference
The most mentioned neuroimaging articles in online media: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 articles with the highest Altmetric Attention Scores
10.1177/0284185119843226 · 2019 · External reference
The most mentioned neurointervention articles in online media: a bibliometric analysis of the top 101 articles with the highest altmetric attention scores
10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014368 · 2019 · External reference
Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.014 · 2019 · External reference
Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
10.1007/s11192-011-0580-x · 2012 · External reference
Can M endeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations
10.1002/asi.23477 · 2016 · External reference
Analysis of the altmetric top 100 articles with the highest altmetric attention scores in medical imaging journals
10.1007/s11604-020-00946-0 · 2020 · External reference
Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007704 · 2020 · External reference
Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?
10.1177/0961000615594867 · 2017 · External reference
Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation counts
10.1007/s11192-018-2715-9 · 2018 · External reference
Media reporting of neuroscience depends on timing, topic and newspaper type
10.1371/journal.pone.0104780 · 2014 · External reference
Bibliographic analysis of nature based on Twitter and Facebook altmetrics data
10.1371/journal.pone.0165997 · 2016 · External reference
Comparison between Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and publishers for mislabelled review papers
10.18520/cs/v116/i11/1909-1914 · 2019 · External reference
A bibliometric review of research trends in neuroimaging
10.18520/cs/v112/i04/725-734 · 2017 · External reference
The changing landscape of neuroscience research, 2006–2015: a bibliometric study
10.3389/fnins.2017.00120 · 2017 · External reference
Empirical assessment of changing sample‐characteristics in task‐fMRI over two decades: an example from gustatory and food studies
10.1002/hbm.24957 · 2020 · External reference
