Research graph
References from Optimizing Complete-Arch Implant Rehabilitations: Comprehensive Review of Restorative Protocols. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an updated systematic review
2021 · External reference
Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review
10.1111/jopr.12527 · 2018 · External reference
Comparative analyses of accuracy between digital and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1111/jopr.14094 · 2026 · External reference
Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029 · 2018 · External reference
Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
10.1111/clr.12994 · 2017 · External reference
Digital versus conventional full-arch implant impressions: a prospective study on 16 edentulous maxillae
10.1111/jopr.13162 · 2020 · External reference
An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques
10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60370-4 · 2013 · External reference
Digital vs conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1111/jopr.13211 · 2020 · External reference
Three-dimensional accuracy of conventional versus digital complete arch implant impressions
10.1111/jopr.13264 · 2021 · External reference
Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: an in vitro study?
10.1111/clr.13890 · 2022 · External reference
A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-an experimental approach
10.1111/jopr.12362 · 2017 · External reference
Effect of scan body designs and internal conical angles on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant digital scans
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.008 · 2024 · External reference
Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13774 · 2023 · External reference
Intraoral digital implant scans: parameters to improve accuracy
10.1111/jopr.13749 · 2023 · External reference
Impact of different scan bodies and scan strategies on the accuracy of digital implant impressions assessed with an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study
10.1111/jopr.13131 · 2020 · External reference
Effect of coded healing abutment height and position on the trueness of digital intraoral implant scans
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.012 · 2020 · External reference
Comparison of three-dimensional accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions: effect of interimplant distance in an edentulous arch
10.11607/jomi.6855 · 2019 · External reference
Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.018 · 2019 · External reference
Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.008 · 2024 · External reference
Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: a crossover randomized trial
10.1111/cid.13336 · 2024 · External reference
Tolerances in the production of six different implant scanbodies: a comparative study
10.11607/ijp.7379 · 2021 · External reference
In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: the effect of implant angulation
10.11607/jomi.5087 · 2017 · External reference
Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: a systematic review
2021 · External reference
Continuous scan strategy (CSS): a novel technique to improve the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions
2020 · External reference
Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.018 · 2023 · External reference
Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 · 2020 · External reference
Effect of scan pattern on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions with two intraoral scanners
10.11607/jomi.9248 · 2022 · External reference
Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system
10.1007/s00784-015-1440-5 · 2015 · External reference
Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015 · 2019 · External reference
Accuracy of intraoral scanners for recording the denture bearing areas: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13345 · 2021 · External reference
Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.037 · 2022 · External reference
Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation
10.11607/ijp.5535 · 2018 · External reference
Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.12853 · 2017 · External reference
Immediate implant placement, immediate load with same-day fully digital fabrication of a screw-retained provisional implant prosthesis
2023 · External reference
Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104072 · 2022 · External reference
Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation
10.1111/clr.13598 · 2020 · External reference
Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.13549 · 2019 · External reference
Evaluating the impact of scan body angulation and geometric attachments on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions: a comparison of two intraoral scanners
10.1111/jopr.13807 · 2025 · External reference
Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: a dental technique
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.008 · 2019 · External reference
Enhancing scanning accuracy of digital implant scans: a systematic review on application methods of scan bodies
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.010 · 2024 · External reference
Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: a pilot clinical trial
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.024 · 2022 · External reference
Guided implant scanning: a procedure for improving the accuracy of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.022 · 2020 · External reference
Digital workflow for double complete arch zirconia prostheses utilizing a novel scan body
10.1111/jopr.13417 · 2022 · External reference
Influence of customized over-scan body rings on the intraoral scanning effectiveness of a multiple implant edentulous mandibular model
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104095 · 2022 · External reference
Full-arch restoration with the NEXUS IOS(R) system: a retrospective clinical evaluation of 37 restorations after a one year of follow-up
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104741 · 2023 · External reference
Use of a dual-purpose implant scan body to obtain both digital and analog records for complete arch fixed implant restorations
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.003 · 2025 · External reference
Enhancing precision and efficiency in fabricating complete arch screw-retained implant prosthesis: a clinical case report utilizing the nexus iOS scan gauge system
10.1563/aaid-joi-d-24-00019 · 2024 · External reference
Accuracy of impression scan bodies for complete arch fixed implant-supported restorations
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.015 · 2025 · External reference
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.012
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.012 · External reference
Comparison of intraoral and extraoral digital scanners: evaluation of surface topography and precision
2020 · External reference
Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation
10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103476 · 2020 · External reference
The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans
10.1111/cid.12919 · 2020 · External reference
In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104391 · 2023 · External reference
Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: time and patient satisfaction
10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.017 · 2018 · External reference
Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review
10.1007/s00784-021-04157-3 · 2021 · External reference
Enhancing Precision and efficiency in fabricating complete arch screw-retained implant prosthesis: a clinical case report utilizing the nexus iOS scan gauge system
10.1563/aaid-joi-d-24-00019 · 2024 · External reference
Maxillary full-arch immediately loaded implant-supported fixed prosthesis designed and produced by photogrammetry and digital printing: a clinical report
10.1111/jopr.12364 · 2017 · External reference
Intraoral scanning and dental photogrammetry for full-arch implant-supported prosthesis: a technique
10.1002/cap.10269 · 2024 · External reference
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005 · 2021 · External reference
Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.017 · 2025 · External reference
Accuracy, scanning time, and patient satisfaction of stereophotogrammetry systems for acquiring 3D dental implant positions: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13751 · 2023 · External reference
EPA consensus project paper: accuracy of photogrammetry devices, intraoral scanners, and conventional techniques for the full-arch implant impressions: a systematic review
2023 · External reference
The reverse scan body protocol: completing the digital workflow
2023 · External reference
Reverse scan body: the scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses
10.1111/jopr.13772 · 2023 · External reference
Reverse impression technique: a fully digital protocol for the fabrication of the definitive fixed prosthesis for completely edentulous patients
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.015 · 2024 · External reference
Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body
10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_21_00328 · 2023 · External reference
Reverse scan body: a retrospective clinical study with 30 edentulous jaws
10.1111/jopr.70055 · 2026 · External reference
Contemporary applications of robotic systems in dental implantology: a review
10.1016/j.identj.2025.109335 · 2026 · External reference
Automatic point cloud patching of intraoral three-dimensional scanning based on deep learning
2025 · External reference
Intraoral scanning and dental photogrammetry for full-arch implant-supported prosthesis: a technique
10.1002/cap.10269 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system
10.1007/s00784-015-1440-5 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review
10.1007/s00784-021-04157-3 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: time and patient satisfaction
10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.017 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Contemporary applications of robotic systems in dental implantology: a review
10.1016/j.identj.2025.109335 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation
10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103476 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with or without scanbody splinting: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104072 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Influence of customized over-scan body rings on the intraoral scanning effectiveness of a multiple implant edentulous mandibular model
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104095 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104391 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Full-arch restoration with the NEXUS IOS(R) system: a retrospective clinical evaluation of 37 restorations after a one year of follow-up
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104741 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: a dental technique
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.008 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.018 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Effect of coded healing abutment height and position on the trueness of digital intraoral implant scans
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.012 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Guided implant scanning: a procedure for improving the accuracy of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.022 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: a pilot clinical trial
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.024 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.037 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: a systematic review
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.018 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Reverse impression technique: a fully digital protocol for the fabrication of the definitive fixed prosthesis for completely edentulous patients
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.015 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.008 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Use of a dual-purpose implant scan body to obtain both digital and analog records for complete arch fixed implant restorations
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.003 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of impression scan bodies for complete arch fixed implant-supported restorations
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.015 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.012
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.12.012 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.017 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Effect of scan body designs and internal conical angles on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant digital scans
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.008 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Enhancing scanning accuracy of digital implant scans: a systematic review on application methods of scan bodies
10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.010 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques
10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60370-4 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans
10.1111/cid.12919 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: a crossover randomized trial
10.1111/cid.13336 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.12853 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
10.1111/clr.12994 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-an in vitro study
10.1111/clr.13549 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation
10.1111/clr.13598 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: an in vitro study?
10.1111/clr.13890 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-an experimental approach
10.1111/jopr.12362 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Maxillary full-arch immediately loaded implant-supported fixed prosthesis designed and produced by photogrammetry and digital printing: a clinical report
10.1111/jopr.12364 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review
10.1111/jopr.12527 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Impact of different scan bodies and scan strategies on the accuracy of digital implant impressions assessed with an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study
10.1111/jopr.13131 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Digital versus conventional full-arch implant impressions: a prospective study on 16 edentulous maxillae
10.1111/jopr.13162 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Digital vs conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1111/jopr.13211 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Three-dimensional accuracy of conventional versus digital complete arch implant impressions
10.1111/jopr.13264 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy of intraoral scanners for recording the denture bearing areas: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13345 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Digital workflow for double complete arch zirconia prostheses utilizing a novel scan body
10.1111/jopr.13417 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Intraoral digital implant scans: parameters to improve accuracy
10.1111/jopr.13749 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Accuracy, scanning time, and patient satisfaction of stereophotogrammetry systems for acquiring 3D dental implant positions: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13751 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Reverse scan body: the scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses
10.1111/jopr.13772 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: a systematic review
10.1111/jopr.13774 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Evaluating the impact of scan body angulation and geometric attachments on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions: a comparison of two intraoral scanners
10.1111/jopr.13807 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparative analyses of accuracy between digital and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1111/jopr.14094 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Reverse scan body: a retrospective clinical study with 30 edentulous jaws
10.1111/jopr.70055 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation
10.11607/ijp.5535 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Tolerances in the production of six different implant scanbodies: a comparative study
10.11607/ijp.7379 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions: the effect of implant angulation
10.11607/jomi.5087 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of three-dimensional accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions: effect of interimplant distance in an edentulous arch
10.11607/jomi.6855 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Effect of scan pattern on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions with two intraoral scanners
10.11607/jomi.9248 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Enhancing Precision and efficiency in fabricating complete arch screw-retained implant prosthesis: a clinical case report utilizing the nexus iOS scan gauge system
10.1563/aaid-joi-d-24-00019 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body
10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_21_00328 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
