Research graph
References from Assessing absolute sustainability: An analysis of impact assessment tools. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
A review of methods contributing to the assessment of the environmental sustainability of industrial systems
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.094 · 2015 · External reference
“In partnership for the goals”? The level of agreement between SDG ratings
10.1016/j.jebo.2023.11.014 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2022 · External reference
Aggregate confusion: the divergence of ESG ratings
10.1093/rof/rfac033 · 2022 · External reference
The boundaries of the planetary boundary framework: a critical appraisal of approaches to define a “Safe Operating Space” for humanity
10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-080337 · 2020 · External reference
Beyond net zero climate targets: a research agenda for absolute environmental sustainability assessment to support decisions at different scales
10.1088/1748-9326/ae3dfa · 2026 · External reference
A framework for development and communication of absolute environmental sustainability assessment methods
10.1111/jiec.12820 · 2019 · External reference
What does it really mean to be a strongly sustainable company? – a response to Nikolaou and Tsalis
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.268 · 2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
From purpose to impact - an investigation of the application of impact measurement and valuation methods for quantifying environmental and social impacts of businesses
2020 · External reference
Unpacking the impact in impact investing
2013 · External reference
Assessing company sustainability impact: status quo and way ahead
10.1111/jiec.70065 · 2025 · External reference
Principles for impact investments: practical guidance for impact measurement, assessment and valuation
10.1007/s43546-025-00796-w · 2025 · External reference
Applying environmental sustainability boundaries for climate change in life cycle assessment: a review of approaches and implications for policymaking
10.1111/jiec.13481 · 2024 · External reference
A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2020 · External reference
Sustainability materiality research: a systematic literature review of methods, theories and academic themes
2022 · External reference
When to use what: methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068 · 2017 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2025 · External reference
The why and how of assigning responsibility for supply chain emissions
10.1038/s41558-022-01543-x · 2022 · External reference
A double-edged sword: materiality classifications of sustainability topics
10.1007/s11142-025-09908-1 · 2025 · External reference
Life cycle assessment‐based Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment is also relative
10.1111/jiec.13260 · 2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Methodological framework to find links between life cycle sustainability assessment categories and the UN Sustainable Development Goals based on literature
10.1111/jiec.13283 · 2023 · External reference
Allocation and characterisation factors for absolute environmental sustainability assessment
10.1038/s41597-026-07797-w · 2026 · External reference
Sharing the safe operating space: exploring ethical allocation principles to operationalize the planetary boundaries and assess absolute sustainability at individual and industrial sector levels
10.1111/jiec.13050 · 2021 · External reference
Defining and conceptualizing impact investing: attractive nuisance or catalyst?
10.1007/s10551-022-05157-3 · 2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2025 · External reference
Does voluntary ESG reporting resolve disagreement among ESG rating agencies?
10.1080/09638180.2022.2088588 · 2022 · External reference
Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact
10.1177/1086026620919202 · 2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Developing sufficiency-based sharing principles for absolute environmental sustainability assessment using decent living standards and planetary boundaries
2025 · External reference
The role of planetary boundaries in assessing absolute environmental sustainability across scales
10.1016/j.envint.2021.106475 · 2021 · External reference
Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017 · 2020 · External reference
Companies' ESG performance under soft and hard regulation environment
10.1007/s43621-025-01657-0 · 2025 · External reference
W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting
10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8 · 2013 · External reference
A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · 2016 · External reference
Integrating life cycle assessment and environmental risk assessment: a critical review
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126120 · 2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 · 2021 · External reference
Approaches to incorporate Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment: a critical review
10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169 · 2024 · External reference
Investigating methodological aspects of absolute environmental sustainability assessment based on planetary boundaries
10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108154 · 2026 · External reference
Measuring the sustainability of investment funds: a critical review of methods and frameworks in sustainable finance
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128016 · 2021 · External reference
A doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity's compass in the 21st century
2017 · External reference
Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries
10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 · 2023 · External reference
A safe operating space for humanity
10.1038/461472a · 2009 · External reference
Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above. Mitigation Pathways compatible with 1
2018 · External reference
Downscaling the planetary boundaries in absolute environmental sustainability assessments – a review
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123287 · 2020 · External reference
How to bring absolute sustainability into decision-making: an industry case study using a Planetary Boundary-based methodology
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.075 · 2018 · External reference
Development of a life-cycle impact assessment methodology linked to the Planetary Boundaries framework
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.065 · 2018 · External reference
Measuring the Doughnut: a good life for all is possible within planetary boundaries
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141447 · 2024 · External reference
Missing the impact in impact investing research – a systematic review and critical reflection of the literature
10.1111/joms.12978 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Does sufficiency ensure sustainability? Applying sufficiency lifestyles allocation in absolute environmental sustainability assessment of textile fibers
2026 · External reference
A taxonomy of climate accounting principles for financial portfolios
10.3390/su10020328 · 2018 · External reference
Measuring companies' environmental and social impacts: an analysis of ESG ratings and SDG scores
10.1177/10860266251326895 · 2025 · External reference
Scientifically assess impacts of sustainable investments
10.1126/science.aao3895 · 2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting
10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Defining and conceptualizing impact investing: attractive nuisance or catalyst?
10.1007/s10551-022-05157-3 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A double-edged sword: materiality classifications of sustainability topics
10.1007/s11142-025-09908-1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Principles for impact investments: practical guidance for impact measurement, assessment and valuation
10.1007/s43546-025-00796-w · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Companies' ESG performance under soft and hard regulation environment
10.1007/s43621-025-01657-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
When to use what: methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Development of a life-cycle impact assessment methodology linked to the Planetary Boundaries framework
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.065 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Investigating methodological aspects of absolute environmental sustainability assessment based on planetary boundaries
10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108154 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The role of planetary boundaries in assessing absolute environmental sustainability across scales
10.1016/j.envint.2021.106475 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A review of methods contributing to the assessment of the environmental sustainability of industrial systems
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.094 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
What does it really mean to be a strongly sustainable company? – a response to Nikolaou and Tsalis
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.268 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Downscaling the planetary boundaries in absolute environmental sustainability assessments – a review
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123287 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Integrating life cycle assessment and environmental risk assessment: a critical review
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126120 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Measuring the sustainability of investment funds: a critical review of methods and frameworks in sustainable finance
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128016 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Measuring the Doughnut: a good life for all is possible within planetary boundaries
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141447 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
“In partnership for the goals”? The level of agreement between SDG ratings
10.1016/j.jebo.2023.11.014 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Approaches to incorporate Planetary Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment: a critical review
10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100169 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
How to bring absolute sustainability into decision-making: an industry case study using a Planetary Boundary-based methodology
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.075 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A safe operating space for humanity
10.1038/461472a · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The why and how of assigning responsibility for supply chain emissions
10.1038/s41558-022-01543-x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Allocation and characterisation factors for absolute environmental sustainability assessment
10.1038/s41597-026-07797-w · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Does voluntary ESG reporting resolve disagreement among ESG rating agencies?
10.1080/09638180.2022.2088588 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Beyond net zero climate targets: a research agenda for absolute environmental sustainability assessment to support decisions at different scales
10.1088/1748-9326/ae3dfa · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Aggregate confusion: the divergence of ESG ratings
10.1093/rof/rfac033 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A framework for development and communication of absolute environmental sustainability assessment methods
10.1111/jiec.12820 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Sharing the safe operating space: exploring ethical allocation principles to operationalize the planetary boundaries and assess absolute sustainability at individual and industrial sector levels
10.1111/jiec.13050 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Life cycle assessment‐based Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment is also relative
10.1111/jiec.13260 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Methodological framework to find links between life cycle sustainability assessment categories and the UN Sustainable Development Goals based on literature
10.1111/jiec.13283 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Applying environmental sustainability boundaries for climate change in life cycle assessment: a review of approaches and implications for policymaking
10.1111/jiec.13481 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Assessing company sustainability impact: status quo and way ahead
10.1111/jiec.70065 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Missing the impact in impact investing research – a systematic review and critical reflection of the literature
10.1111/joms.12978 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries
10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Scientifically assess impacts of sustainable investments
10.1126/science.aao3895 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The boundaries of the planetary boundary framework: a critical appraisal of approaches to define a “Safe Operating Space” for humanity
10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-080337 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact
10.1177/1086026620919202 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Measuring companies' environmental and social impacts: an analysis of ESG ratings and SDG scores
10.1177/10860266251326895 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A taxonomy of climate accounting principles for financial portfolios
10.3390/su10020328 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
