References

Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review

10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 · 2020 · External reference

A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser

10.1371/journal.pone.0149625 · 2016 · External reference

Accuracy of computer-assisted orthognathic surgery

10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.023 · 2018 · External reference

Accuracy of mandibular proximal segment position using virtual surgical planning and custom osteosynthesis plates

10.1016/j.ijom.2021.04.002 · 2022 · External reference

Stability of proximal mandibular anatomical structures following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

10.1016/j.ijom.2024.04.006 · 2024 · External reference

Evaluation of condylar resorption before and after orthognathic surgery

10.1053/j.sodo.2012.11.006 · 2013 · External reference

Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study

10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027 · 2013 · External reference

Three-dimensional changes in the mandibular proximal segment after using a surgery-first approach in patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry

10.1097/scs.0000000000008520 · 2022 · External reference

Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal Class III malocclusions

10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.031 · 2014 · External reference

Surgical stability after proximal segment angle alteration in patients with Class III facial asymmetry

10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.002 · 2023 · External reference

Accuracy between virtual surgical planning and actual outcomes in orthognathic surgery by iterative closest point algorithm and color maps: a retrospective cohort study. Med. Oral Patol

2019 · External reference

Reliability statistics every orthodontist should know

10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.004 · 2024 · External reference

Virtually planned orthognathic surgery achieves an accurate condylar position

10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.048 · 2021 · External reference

Does artificial intelligence predict orthognathic surgical outcomes better than conventional linear regression methods?

10.2319/111423-756.1 · 2024 · External reference

Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary position between conventional model surgery and virtual surgical planning

10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.012 · 2018 · External reference

Correction of a severe facial asymmetry with computerized planning and with the use of a rapid prototyped surgical template: a case report/technique article

10.1186/1746-160x-10-27 · 2014 · External reference

Three-dimensional planning accuracy and follow-up protocol in orthognathic surgery: a validation study

10.1016/j.ijom.2018.07.011 · 2019 · External reference

Surgical accuracy in inferior maxillary reposition

10.1016/j.joms.2018.05.022 · 2018 · External reference

Three-dimensional evaluation of the mandibular proximal segment, condyle and coronoid process after orthognathic surgery

2026 · External reference

Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning

10.1111/ocr.12262 · 2019 · External reference

New clinical protocol to evaluate craniomaxillofacial deformity and plan surgical correction

10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.057 · 2009 · External reference

Three-dimensional evaluation of proximal segment positional changes and postoperative stability in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy using the novel index Co–B distance

2026 · External reference

Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery

10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.021 · 2013 · External reference

Does the sequence of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery affect accuracy in skeletal Class III patients?

10.1016/j.joms.2024.07.013 · 2024 · External reference

Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in two-jaw orthognathic surgery: comparison of planned and actual results

10.1016/j.oooo.2016.03.004 · 2016 · External reference