Research graph
References from Urban park biodiversity preferences and trade-offs: A comparison between residents and professionals using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
On environmental preference: Applying conjoint analysis to visiting parks and buying houses
2010 · External reference
Perceptions of park visitors on access to urban parks and benefits of green spaces
10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126959 · 2021 · External reference
Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation
10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006 · 2006 · External reference
The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 · 2014 · External reference
Exploring perceptions towards biodiversity conservation in urban parks: Insights on acceptability and design attributes
10.1016/j.jum.2024.05.006 · 2024 · External reference
Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038 · 2004 · External reference
Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness
10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9 · 2012 · External reference
The effect of spontaneous wild vegetation on landscape preferences in urban green spaces
2023 · External reference
Beyond green: Broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.001 · 2018 · External reference
Public attitudes toward biodiversity-friendly greenspace management in Europe
10.1111/conl.12718 · 2020 · External reference
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity
10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 · 2007 · External reference
The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · 2007 · External reference
What’s biodiversity got to do with it? Perceptions of biodiversity and restorativeness in urban parks
10.5751/es-12598-260325 · 2021 · External reference
The role of urban green space in promoting health and well-being is related to nature connectedness and biodiversity: Evidence from a two-factor mixed-design experiment
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105020 · 2024 · External reference
Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents
10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001 · 2012 · External reference
All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011 · 2017 · External reference
“Not in their front yard” The opportunities and challenges of introducing perennial urban meadows: A local authority stakeholder perspective
10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.009 · 2017 · External reference
Perceptions of urban rewilding in a park with secondary succession vegetation growth on lake silt: Landscape preferences and perceived species richness
10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648 · 2025 · External reference
The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: A review
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105153 · 2024 · External reference
Exploring preferences for biodiversity and wild parks in chinese cities: A conjoint analysis study in Hangzhou
10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127595 · 2022 · External reference
It’s ok to be wilder: Preference for natural growth in urban green spaces in a tropical city
10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.005 · 2019 · External reference
Integrating Biodiversity in Urban Planning and Design Processes. Book of abstracts of the 7th International Conference of the Network URBIO – Urban Biodiversity & Design
2023 · External reference
Floristic investigations of historical parks in St. Petersburg, Russia
2004 · External reference
The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes
10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161 · 2016 · External reference
Does biological quality matter? Direct and reflected appraisal of biodiversity in temperate deciduous broad-leaf forest
10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.009 · 2014 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
1989 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1993 · External reference
How do different types and landscape attributes of urban parks affect visitors’ positive emotions?
2022 · External reference
Urban wilderness: Supply, demand, and access
10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.017 · 2018 · External reference
Pro-environmental behaviour, connectedness with nature, and the endorsement of pro-environmental norms in youth: Longitudinal relations
10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102256 · 2024 · External reference
The relationship between landscape design style and the conservation value of parks: A case study of a historical park in Weimar
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.006 · 2012 · External reference
Cues to care: A systematic analytical review
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103821 · 2020 · External reference
The relationships among biodiversity, perceived biodiversity and recreational preference in urban green spaces–a case study in Xianyang, China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109916 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2020 · External reference
The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation
10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003 · 2010 · External reference
Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden?
10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011 · 2013 · External reference
Why is dense vegetation in city parks unpopular? the mediative role of sense of privacy and safety
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126988 · 2021 · External reference
Preferences for urban green space characteristics: A comparative study in three Portuguese cities
10.3390/environments5020023 · 2018 · External reference
Theoretical foundations of biodiversity and mental well-being relationships
2019 · External reference
The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature
10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 · 2004 · External reference
Nature on our doorstep: How do residents perceive urban parks vs. biodiverse areas?
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105059 · 2024 · External reference
10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10
10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10 · External reference
URBIO: An introduction to the international network in urban biodiversity and design
10.1007/s11355-010-0139-7 · 2011 · External reference
10.1002/9781444318654
10.1002/9781444318654 · External reference
Messy ecosystems, orderly frames
10.3368/lj.14.2.161 · 1995 · External reference
Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence
10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1 · 2013 · External reference
10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0016
10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2010 · External reference
Attitudes of landscape professionals towards naturalistic versus formal urban landscapes in the UK
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.002 · 2007 · External reference
What do people value in urban green? linking characteristics of urban green spaces to users’ perceptions of nature benefits, disturbances, and disservices
10.5751/es-12204-260128 · 2021 · External reference
Understanding the relative importance of micro-level design characteristics of walking paths in parks to promote walking among older adults
10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128129 · 2023 · External reference
Measuring what people value: A comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys
10.1111/1475-6773.01116 · 2002 · External reference
Is biodiversity attractive?-On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007 · 2013 · External reference
Public visual preference for dead wood in different types of landscape
2021 · External reference
The green care code: How nature connectedness and simple activities help explain pro-nature conservation behaviours
10.1002/pan3.10117 · 2020 · External reference
Important park features for encouraging park visitation, physical activity and social interaction among adolescents: A conjoint analysis
10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102617 · 2021 · External reference
Barriers and opportunities of combining social and ecological functions of urban greenspaces – users’ and landscape professionals’ perspectives
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.02.007 · 2019 · External reference
Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well-being impacts
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002 · 2018 · External reference
Recognising the fourth Nature: A case study of spontaneous urban vegetation in Southwest Australian cities
10.3390/land14030467 · 2025 · External reference
Wild or neat? personal traits affect public preference for wildness of urban lakeshores in France and China
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105190 · 2024 · External reference
Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.011 · 2016 · External reference
What entices older adults to parks? Identification of park features that encourage park visitation, physical activity, and social interaction
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104254 · 2022 · External reference
Landscape and health
2016 · External reference
Public perceptions and preferences regarding lawns and their alternatives in China: A case study of Xi’an
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126478 · 2019 · External reference
The heterogeneous preferences for conservation and management in urban wetland parks: A case study from China
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127064 · 2021 · External reference
The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China
10.1186/s40657-020-00234-5 · 2020 · External reference
Preference to home landscape: Wildness or neatness?
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.006 · 2011 · External reference
10.1002/9781444318654
10.1002/9781444318654 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The green care code: How nature connectedness and simple activities help explain pro-nature conservation behaviours
10.1002/pan3.10117 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10
10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence
10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
URBIO: An introduction to the international network in urban biodiversity and design
10.1007/s11355-010-0139-7 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation
10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden?
10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The relationships among biodiversity, perceived biodiversity and recreational preference in urban green spaces–a case study in Xianyang, China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109916 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Beyond green: Broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.001 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Important park features for encouraging park visitation, physical activity and social interaction among adolescents: A conjoint analysis
10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102617 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature
10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Pro-environmental behaviour, connectedness with nature, and the endorsement of pro-environmental norms in youth: Longitudinal relations
10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102256 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Exploring perceptions towards biodiversity conservation in urban parks: Insights on acceptability and design attributes
10.1016/j.jum.2024.05.006 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Attitudes of landscape professionals towards naturalistic versus formal urban landscapes in the UK
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.002 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Preference to home landscape: Wildness or neatness?
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.006 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The relationship between landscape design style and the conservation value of parks: A case study of a historical park in Weimar
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.006 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Is biodiversity attractive?-On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.011 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well-being impacts
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Cues to care: A systematic analytical review
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103821 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
What entices older adults to parks? Identification of park features that encourage park visitation, physical activity, and social interaction
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104254 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The role of urban green space in promoting health and well-being is related to nature connectedness and biodiversity: Evidence from a two-factor mixed-design experiment
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105020 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Nature on our doorstep: How do residents perceive urban parks vs. biodiverse areas?
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105059 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: A review
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105153 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Wild or neat? personal traits affect public preference for wildness of urban lakeshores in France and China
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105190 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation
10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents
10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Does biological quality matter? Direct and reflected appraisal of biodiversity in temperate deciduous broad-leaf forest
10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.009 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
“Not in their front yard” The opportunities and challenges of introducing perennial urban meadows: A local authority stakeholder perspective
10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.009 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Urban wilderness: Supply, demand, and access
10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.017 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
It’s ok to be wilder: Preference for natural growth in urban green spaces in a tropical city
10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.005 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Barriers and opportunities of combining social and ecological functions of urban greenspaces – users’ and landscape professionals’ perspectives
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.02.007 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Public perceptions and preferences regarding lawns and their alternatives in China: A case study of Xi’an
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126478 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perceptions of park visitors on access to urban parks and benefits of green spaces
10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126959 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Why is dense vegetation in city parks unpopular? the mediative role of sense of privacy and safety
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126988 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The heterogeneous preferences for conservation and management in urban wetland parks: A case study from China
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127064 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Exploring preferences for biodiversity and wild parks in chinese cities: A conjoint analysis study in Hangzhou
10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127595 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Understanding the relative importance of micro-level design characteristics of walking paths in parks to promote walking among older adults
10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128129 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perceptions of urban rewilding in a park with secondary succession vegetation growth on lake silt: Landscape preferences and perceived species richness
10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128648 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The coexistence of amenity and biodiversity in urban landscapes
10.1080/01426397.2015.1081161 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0016
10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0016 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity
10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Measuring what people value: A comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys
10.1111/1475-6773.01116 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Public attitudes toward biodiversity-friendly greenspace management in Europe
10.1111/conl.12718 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China
10.1186/s40657-020-00234-5 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness
10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Messy ecosystems, orderly frames
10.3368/lj.14.2.161 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Preferences for urban green space characteristics: A comparative study in three Portuguese cities
10.3390/environments5020023 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Recognising the fourth Nature: A case study of spontaneous urban vegetation in Southwest Australian cities
10.3390/land14030467 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
What do people value in urban green? linking characteristics of urban green spaces to users’ perceptions of nature benefits, disturbances, and disservices
10.5751/es-12204-260128 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
What’s biodiversity got to do with it? Perceptions of biodiversity and restorativeness in urban parks
10.5751/es-12598-260325 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
