Research graph
References from Is one year follow-up sufficient to assess functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair?. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence
10.1308/003588406x94968 · 2006 · External reference
Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears
10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001 · 2012 · External reference
National trends in rotator cuff repair
10.2106/jbjs.j.00739 · 2012 · External reference
Trends associated with open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
10.1007/s11420-018-9628-2 · 2019 · External reference
Is there an association between the “critical shoulder angle” and clinical outcome after rotator cuff repair?
10.1177/2325967117702126 · 2017 · External reference
Tendon repair compared with physiotherapy in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled study in 103 cases with a five-year follow-up
10.2106/jbjs.m.01393 · 2014 · External reference
Cost-utility analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective health economic study using real-world data
2020 · External reference
Trends in shoulder surgery patient-reported outcome measures
10.1016/j.jseint.2023.03.010 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2011 · External reference
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome instruments for use in patients with rotator cuff disease
10.1177/0363546514565096 · 2015 · External reference
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores correlate positively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores postoperatively in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair
10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.039 · 2020 · External reference
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) correlates with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.013 · 2020 · External reference
Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation be used as a stand-alone subjective outcome instrument in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair?
10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.017 · 2022 · External reference
A last-ditch effort and personalized surgeon letter improves PROMs follow-up rate in sports medicine patients: a crossover randomized controlled trial
10.1055/s-0039-1694057 · 2021 · External reference
Sleep quality and disturbances in patients with different-sized rotator cuff tear
10.1007/s12306-016-0405-4 · 2016 · External reference
Defining clinically significant outcomes following superior capsular reconstruction with acellular dermal allograft
10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.039 · 2022 · External reference
Minimal clinically important difference substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
10.1177/0363546520943862 · 2020 · External reference
Minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in patients who underwent rotator cuff tear repair
10.3390/ijerph18168666 · 2021 · External reference
How is maximum outcome improvement defined in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff repair? A 1-year follow-up study
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.047 · 2020 · External reference
Changes from baseline in patient-reported outcomes at 1 year versus 2 years after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1177/03635465211023967 · 2022 · External reference
One- and 2-year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores do not vary significantly after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective multicenter analysis of 1,567 patients
10.1016/j.arthro.2023.09.024 · 2024 · External reference
One-year follow-up is sufficient time for patient-reported outcomes following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
2024 · External reference
Time required to achieve clinically significant outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
10.1177/0363546520962512 · 2020 · External reference
Determining the time required to achieve clinically significant outcomes on the PROMIS upper extremity questionnaire after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
10.1177/23259671231157038 · 2023 · External reference
Editorial commentary: One- and 2-year outcomes are clinically similar after rotator cuff repair: what are we waiting for?
10.1016/j.arthro.2023.11.002 · 2024 · External reference
