Research graph
References from A comparison of contextualized and non-contextualized meaning-recall vocabulary test formats. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
An investigation into the roles of guessing and partial knowledge in the vocabulary size test
10.55593/ej.26103a15 · 2022 · External reference
Variations in format and willingness to skip items in a multiple-choice vocabulary test
2012 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2013 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Cocron: A web interface and R package for the statistical comparison of Cronbach's alpha coefficients
2016 · External reference
Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1177/0265532212459028 · 2012 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2013 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2022 · External reference
Using confidence intervals to determine adequate item sample sizes for vocabulary tests: An essential but overlooked practice
10.1177/0265532220979562 · 2021 · External reference
Assessing vocabulary size through multiple-choice formats: Issues with guessing and sampling rates
10.1075/itl.166.2.04gyl · 2015 · External reference
A study of the effects of contextualization and familiarization on responses to the TOEFL vocabulary test items
1991 · External reference
A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure
1979 · External reference
Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension
2000 · External reference
Challenges in the assumptions of using a flemma-based word counting unit
10.7820/vli.v10.1.ishii · 2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
L2 Reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis
10.1111/lang.12034 · 2014 · External reference
The development and validation of a bilingual version of the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1177/0033688212439359 · 2012 · External reference
Interpreting vocabulary test scores: What do various item formats tell us about learners’ ability to employ words?
10.1080/15434303.2016.1237516 · 2016 · External reference
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
10.2307/2529310 · 1977 · External reference
What percentage of text lexis is essential for comprehension?
1989 · External reference
Understanding L2-derived words in context: Is complete receptive morphological knowledge necessary?
2023 · External reference
Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness
10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x · 2004 · External reference
How well do learners know derived words? The effect of proficiency, word frequency and type of affix
10.1075/itl.20020.lau · 2021 · External reference
Test taking and DK use on the vocabulary size test
10.7820/vli.v03.2.lucovich · 2014 · External reference
A proposed taxonomy of test-taking action and item format in written receptive vocabulary testing
10.7820/vli.v11.1.martin · 2022 · External reference
The potential impact of guessing on monolingual and bilingual versions of the vocabulary size test
2015 · External reference
Evidence for the adoption of the flemma as an appropriate word counting unit
10.1093/applin/amw050 · 2018 · External reference
The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized
10.64152/10125/67396 · 2021 · External reference
An edited version of the first eight 1,000-word frequency bands of the Japanese-English version of the Vocabulary Size Test
10.37546/jalttlt40.4-1 · 2016 · External reference
An empirical examination of the effect of guessing on vocabulary size test scores
10.7820/vli.v04.1.mclean.et.al · 2015 · External reference
The internal consistency and accuracy of automatically scored written receptive meaning-recall data: A preliminary study
10.7820/vli.v10.2.mclean · 2021 · External reference
Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach
10.1177/0265532219898380 · 2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1992 · External reference
How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?
10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 · 2006 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2011 · External reference
The four strands
10.2167/illt039.0 · 2007 · External reference
Which words do you need?
2015 · External reference
A bilingual Vocabulary Size Test of English for Vietnamese learners
10.1177/0033688210390264 · 2011 · External reference
Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines
2020 · External reference
Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective
10.1111/1467-9922.00193 · 2002 · External reference
From single words to passages: Contextual effects on predictive power of vocabulary measures for assessing reading performance
10.1080/15434300701776138 · 2008 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2010 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2010 · External reference
The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension
10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x · 2011 · External reference
Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation
10.1017/s0261444819000326 · 2019 · External reference
Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test
10.1177/026553220101800103 · 2001 · External reference
Establishing meaning recall and meaning recognition vocabulary knowledge as distinct psychometric constructs in relation to reading proficiency
2023 · External reference
What the research shows about written receptive vocabulary testing: A reply to Webb
10.1017/s0272263121000437 · 2021 · External reference
Is “I don't know” a viable answer choice on the Vocabulary Size Test?
10.1002/tesq.325 · 2016 · External reference
Is the lemma more appropriate than the flemma as a word counting unit?
10.1093/applin/amy059 · 2020 · External reference
Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge
10.1017/s027226312000025x · 2021 · External reference
The relationship of four variants of the Vocabulary Size Test to a criterion measure of meaning-recall vocabulary knowledge
2019 · External reference
A serial multiple-choice format designed to reduce overestimation of meaning-recall knowledge on the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1002/tesq.429 · 2018 · External reference
Comparing effects of two types of vocabulary knowledge on six question types in reading tests among Japanese EFL learners
10.20622/jltaj.12.0_104 · 2009 · External reference
Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications
10.1016/j.system.2009.01.004 · 2009 · External reference
A different perspective on the limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge
10.1017/s0272263121000449 · 2021 · External reference
The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT
10.1075/itl.168.1.02web · 2017 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1953 · External reference
Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II – validation activities
2007 · External reference
The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis
10.1177/1362168820913998 · 2022 · External reference
The I don't know option in the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1002/tesq.98 · 2013 · External reference
Validation of the Mandarin version of the Vocabulary Size Test
10.1177/0033688216639761 · 2018 · External reference
