Research graph
References from To improve problematic practices in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) worldwide we should focus and work towards addressing concerns and issues that we all agree on. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Correspondence on ‘bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA): validity, reliability, cognitive. bias and error rate’
2026 · External reference
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA): validity, reliability, cognitive bias and error rate
10.1016/j.scijus.2025.02.002 · 2025 · External reference
Bloodstain classification methods: what methods do analysts use, why, and how accurate are they?
10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112797 · 2026 · External reference
The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency
10.1111/1556-4029.15369 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2020 · External reference
10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00660-x
10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00660-x · External reference
Forensic psychologists’ perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations
10.1037/law0000077 · 2016 · External reference
10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001
10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001 · External reference
Biased and biasing: the hidden Bias Cascade and Bias snowball effects
10.3390/bs15040490 · 2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2009 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2016 · External reference
Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences
10.1093/lpr/mgs013 · 2013 · External reference
10.1073/pnas.2528192123
10.1073/pnas.2528192123 · External reference
Systems fail people: dry labbing as a distinct category of scientific fraud
10.1016/j.scijus.2026.101491 · 2026 · External reference
The limits of accreditation: monopoly, insularity, and the need for openness in forensic science
2026 · External reference
The error in ‘error rate’: why error rates are so needed, yet so elusive
10.1111/1556-4029.14435 · 2020 · External reference
Navigating the bias danger zone: evaluating the (in)efficiency of linear sequential unmasking (LSU-E) as a bias countermeasure
2026 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2026 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2026 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2015 · External reference
Linear Sequential Unmasking–Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias
2021 · External reference
Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: six fallacies and the eight sources of bias
10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704 · 2020 · External reference
Using the likelihood ratio in bloodstain pattern analysis
10.1111/1556-4029.14899 · 2022 · External reference
Mixture interpretation: defining the policy gaps for a complex source of DNA evidence
2010 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2026 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2025 · External reference
Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter-and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a ‘target’ comparison
10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.10.013 · 2011 · External reference
Fingermark submission decision-making within a UK fingerprint laboratory: do experts get the marks that they need?
10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01.007 · 2015 · External reference
Linear sequential unmasking–expanded (LSU-E): a general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias
10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100161 · 2021 · External reference
A probabilistic formalisation of contextual bias: from forensic analysis to systemic bias in the criminal justice system
10.1111/rssa.12962 · 2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter-and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a ‘target’ comparison
10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.10.013 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Bloodstain classification methods: what methods do analysts use, why, and how accurate are they?
10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112797 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Linear sequential unmasking–expanded (LSU-E): a general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias
10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100161 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001
10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Fingermark submission decision-making within a UK fingerprint laboratory: do experts get the marks that they need?
10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01.007 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA): validity, reliability, cognitive bias and error rate
10.1016/j.scijus.2025.02.002 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Systems fail people: dry labbing as a distinct category of scientific fraud
10.1016/j.scijus.2026.101491 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00660-x
10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00660-x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: six fallacies and the eight sources of bias
10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Forensic psychologists’ perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations
10.1037/law0000077 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1073/pnas.2528192123
10.1073/pnas.2528192123 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences
10.1093/lpr/mgs013 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The error in ‘error rate’: why error rates are so needed, yet so elusive
10.1111/1556-4029.14435 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Using the likelihood ratio in bloodstain pattern analysis
10.1111/1556-4029.14899 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency
10.1111/1556-4029.15369 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A probabilistic formalisation of contextual bias: from forensic analysis to systemic bias in the criminal justice system
10.1111/rssa.12962 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Biased and biasing: the hidden Bias Cascade and Bias snowball effects
10.3390/bs15040490 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
