References

The society of thoracic surgeons composite score for rating program performance for lobectomy for lung cancer

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.081 · 2016 · External reference

Management of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: an American college of chest physicians clinical practice guideline

10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.023 · 2025 · External reference

Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer (VIOLET): a randomized controlled trial

10.3310/thbq1793 · 2022 · External reference

Ninety-day mortality of thoracoscopic vs open lobectomy: a large multicenter cohort study

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.07.050 · 2023 · External reference

Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, VATS, and robotic approaches

10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.010 · 2021 · External reference

Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by VATS versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer

10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017 · 2025 · External reference

Survival after thoracoscopic surgery or open lobectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.144 · 2021 · External reference

Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

2013 · External reference

Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage II non-small cell lung cancer

10.1097/sla.0000000000003231 · 2021 · External reference

Pulmonary open, robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) study: an analysis of 5,721 cases

10.1097/sla.0000000000005115 · 2023 · External reference

Robotic versus VATS pulmonary lobectomy: reconstructed patient-level meta-analysis

10.21037/jtd-23-582 · 2023 · External reference

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus VATS for lung lobectomy: a meta-analysis

10.1186/s12885-021-08241-5 · 2021 · External reference

Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus VATS lobectomy after neoadjuvant therapy

2025 · External reference

The role of lung cancer surgical technique on lymph node sampling and pathologic nodal upstaging

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.09.040 · 2023 · External reference

Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.090 · 2022 · External reference

Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery for resectable lung cancer

10.1016/j.chest.2019.09.017 · 2020 · External reference

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer

10.1093/bjs/znab278 · 2021 · External reference

Comparing outcomes following open, hybrid, minimally invasive, and robotic-assisted esophagectomy

2025 · External reference

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: nationwide retrospective analysis

10.1097/sla.0000000000003500 · 2021 · External reference

Outcomes after minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy

2022 · External reference

Comparison of utilization trends, outcomes, and costs between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy

10.1007/s00464-025-12244-9 · 2025 · External reference

Recurrence and survival after minimally invasive and open esophagectomy: ENSURE study post hoc analysis

10.1097/sla.0000000000006280 · 2024 · External reference

Better long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy

10.1245/s10434-022-11922-5 · 2022 · External reference

Robotic versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review

10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013 · 2021 · External reference

Cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: ROBOT trial

2023 · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

A national analysis of open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for stage I–III thymoma

10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.114 · 2020 · External reference

Comparative effectiveness and cost-efficiency of surgical approaches for thymectomy

10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.037 · 2020 · External reference

Perioperative outcomes of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.071 · 2022 · External reference

Thymectomy outcomes in the veterans health administration

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.020 · 2022 · External reference

Robot-assisted versus open surgery for the resection of large thymomas

10.1002/jso.28113 · 2025 · External reference

Robot- versus video-assisted surgery for thymoma: a meta-analysis of 7,347 patients

10.1186/s12957-025-04132-2 · 2025 · External reference

Comparison of minimally invasive thymectomy approaches

10.1093/ejcts/ezaf366 · 2025 · External reference

Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open thymectomy

10.1093/ejcts/ezac238 · 2022 · External reference

Robotic-assisted thymectomy for large thymomas

10.21037/jtd-24-637 · 2024 · External reference

Understanding variation in In-Hospital mortality after major surgery in the United States

10.1097/sla.0000000000005862 · 2023 · External reference

Variation in outcomes across surgeons meeting the leapfrog volume standard for complex oncologic surgery

10.1002/cncr.33766 · 2021 · External reference

Understanding failure to rescue after esophagectomy in the United States

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.044 · 2020 · External reference

Impact of hospital characteristics on failure to rescue following major surgery

10.1097/sla.0000000000001414 · 2016 · External reference

Participation in targeted quality improvement registries is associated with improved outcomes after esophagectomy

2024 · External reference

Perioperative lung resection outcomes after implementation of a Multidisciplinary, Evidence-Based Thoracic ERAS Program

10.1097/sla.0000000000003719 · 2021 · External reference

Enhanced recovery decreases pulmonary and cardiac complications after thoracotomy for lung cancer

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.088 · 2018 · External reference

Robotic lobectomy is cost-effective and provides comparable health utility scores to video-assisted lobectomy: early results of the RAVAL trial

10.1097/sla.0000000000006073 · 2023 · External reference