Research graph
References from Restorative resection in robot-assisted <i>versus</i> laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: systematic review and meta-analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023
2023 · External reference
The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?
10.1002/bjs.1800691019 · 1982 · External reference
Robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer
10.1001/jama.2025.8123 · 2025 · External reference
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial
10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00248-5 · 2022 · External reference
The COMPARE study: comparing perioperative outcomes of oncologic minimally invasive laparoscopic, da Vinci robotic, and open procedures
10.1097/sla.0000000000006572 · 2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION)
10.1093/jnci/djaf084 · 2025 · External reference
Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort analysis in experienced centers
10.1097/dcr.0000000000002031 · 2022 · External reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 · 2021 · External reference
Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · 2016 · External reference
American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification
10.4103/0019-5049.79879 · 2011 · External reference
Classification of surgical complications
10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · 2004 · External reference
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
10.1136/bmj.l4898 · 2019 · External reference
Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument
10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x · 2003 · External reference
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · 2004 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis
2022 · External reference
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes
10.1007/s00464-010-1134-7 · 2010 · External reference
A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery
10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1 · 2012 · External reference
Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison
10.1007/s00268-013-2419-5 · 2014 · External reference
A comparative study of single-port laparoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
10.1177/1553350614556367 · 2015 · External reference
Robotic-assisted surgery improves the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopy: results of a case-controlled analysis
10.1007/s00268-015-3303-2 · 2016 · External reference
Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center
10.1007/s00595-015-1266-4 · 2016 · External reference
Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients
10.1111/codi.13783 · 2017 · External reference
Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial
10.1001/jama.2017.7219 · 2017 · External reference
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer
10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8 · 2017 · External reference
Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study
10.1007/s00384-016-2682-7 · 2017 · External reference
Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections
10.1007/s00464-018-6209-x · 2018 · External reference
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
10.1097/sla.0000000000002321 · 2018 · External reference
TME for rectal cancer: consecutive 70 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique-cumulative experience in a single centre
10.1007/s13304-019-00655-y · 2019 · External reference
Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection
10.1007/s00384-017-2943-0 · 2018 · External reference
Evaluation of effect of robotic versus laparoscopic surgical technology on genitourinary function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106800 · 2022 · External reference
Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x · 2022 · External reference
Cost-effectiveness of robotic compared with laparoscopic rectal resection. Results from the Spanish prospective national trial ROBOCOSTES
10.1016/j.surg.2024.109134 · 2025 · External reference
Short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer
10.1007/s00423-025-03747-z · 2025 · External reference
Stoma versus anastomosis after sphincter-sparing rectal cancer resection; the impact on health-related quality of life
10.1007/s00384-022-04257-w · 2022 · External reference
Does oncological outcome differ between restorative and nonrestorative low anterior resection in patients with primary rectal cancer?
10.1111/codi.15464 · 2021 · External reference
Comparison of three-year oncological results after restorative low anterior resection, non-restorative low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.100 · 2023 · External reference
Prediction of surgical difficulty in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer by use of MRI pelvimetry
10.1002/bjs5.50292 · 2020 · External reference
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si
10.1007/s00384-016-2631-5 · 2016 · External reference
The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review
10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z · 2022 · External reference
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
10.1177/14574969241271784 · 2025 · External reference
Permanent stoma rate and long-term stoma complications in laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a retrospective cohort study
10.1007/s00464-023-10517-9 · 2024 · External reference
