References

Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the Society of University Surgeons

10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.011 · 2008 · External reference

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61083-7 · 2009 · External reference

Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation

10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61086-2 · 2009 · External reference

No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations

10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61116-8 · 2009 · External reference

IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices

10.1136/bmj.i2372 · 2016 · External reference

Reporting modifications in surgical innovation: a systematic scoping review protocol

10.29337/ijsp.167 · 2021 · External reference

Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review

10.1093/bjsopen/zrad020 · 2023 · External reference

Healthcare organization policy recommendations for the governance of surgical innovation: review of NHS policies

10.1093/bjs/znac223 · 2022 · External reference

Safety and transparency in surgical innovation

10.12968/hmed.2022.0073 · 2022 · External reference

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review

10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x · 2006 · External reference

Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: a before and after study

10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.032 · 2016 · External reference

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004 · 2011 · External reference

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · 2009 · External reference

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

10.1136/bmj.n71 · 2021 · External reference

Effect of PRISMA 2009 on reporting quality in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in high-impact dental medicine journals between 1993–2018

10.1371/journal.pone.0295864 · 2023 · External reference

The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines

10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.10.034 · 2020 · External reference

The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines

10.1097/js9.0000000000000373 · 2023 · External reference

New reporting guidelines for IDEAL studies

2020 · External reference

The IDEAL reporting guidelines: a Delphi consensus statement stage specific recommendations for reporting the evaluation of surgical innovation

10.1097/sla.0000000000004180 · 2021 · External reference

The IDEAL and the EQUATOR

10.1111/codi.14380 · 2018 · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

No surgical innovation without evaluation evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations

10.1097/sla.0000000000002794 · 2019 · External reference

Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029574 · 2019 · External reference

A core outcome set for seamless, standardized evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices (COHESIVE)

10.1097/sla.0000000000004975 · 2023 · External reference

Identifying and reporting modifications to surgical innovation: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies

10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097097 · 2025 · External reference

Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations

10.1097/acm.0000000000000388 · 2014 · External reference

Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples

10.1177/1744987120927206 · 2020 · External reference

Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research

10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y · 2015 · External reference

What are patients told about innovative surgical procedures? A qualitative synthesis of 7 case studies in the United Kingdom

10.1097/sla.0000000000005714 · 2023 · External reference

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis

10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091 · 2018 · External reference

Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research

10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251 · 1995 · External reference

Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough?

10.1177/1049732316665344 · 2017 · External reference

Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing

10.1093/poq/nfm006 · 2007 · External reference

Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups

10.1038/bdj.2008.192 · 2008 · External reference

The ‘doctor’ or the ‘girl from the University’? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing

10.1093/fampra/17.1.71 · 2000 · External reference

Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806 · 2019 · External reference

Using thematic analysis in psychology

10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · 2006 · External reference

Positioning positivism, critical realism and social constructionism in the health sciences: a philosophical orientation

10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00558.x · 2012 · External reference

Using critical realism in primary care research: an overview of methods

10.1093/fampra/cmz084 · 2020 · External reference

Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development

10.1177/160940690600500107 · 2006 · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing

10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092 · 2018 · External reference

Core outcome sets in medical research

10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000284 · 2022 · External reference

Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines

10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217 · 2010 · External reference

Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines

10.1186/s40900-023-00433-6 · 2023 · External reference

Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review

10.1371/journal.pone.0020476 · 2011 · External reference

Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set

10.1002/bjs5.50358 · 2020 · External reference

IDEAL-Physio: a new tool guiding innovation and evaluation of complex interventions and enacting the EBM-manifesto in physiotherapy

2018 · External reference

R-IDEAL: a framework for systematic clinical evaluation of technical innovations in radiation oncology

10.3389/fonc.2017.00059 · 2017 · External reference

DECIDE-AI: new reporting guidelines to bridge the development-to-implementation gap in clinical artificial intelligence

10.1038/s41591-021-01229-5 · 2021 · External reference

Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI

10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9 · 2022 · External reference

The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring

10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7 · 2024 · External reference