Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureResearch graph
References from A Comparative Study of ad^Writer and Human Evaluations of Guideline Reporting Quality: Performance of ChatGPT and DeepSeek. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
How to Differentiate Clinical Practice Guidelines From Expert Consensus
2019 · External reference
Evaluation and ranking for scientific, transparent and applicable of Chinese guidelines and consensus published in the medical journals in 2022
2023 · External reference
The Management of Gout
2023 · External reference
Korean Guidelines for the Management of Gout
10.3904/kjim.2023.206 · 2023 · External reference
2023 EULAR Recommendations on Imaging in Diagnosis and Management of Crystal‐Induced Arthropathies in Clinical Practice
10.1136/ard-2023-224771 · 2024 · External reference
Development of the Scientific, Transparent and Applicable Rankings (STAR) Tool for Clinical Practice Guidelines
10.1097/cm9.0000000000002713 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
A Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT Statement
10.7326/m16-1565 · 2017 · External reference
Clinical Epidemiology in China Series. Paper 4: The Reporting and Methodological Quality of Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines Published Between 2014 and 2018: A Systematic Review
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.013 · 2021 · External reference
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Expert Consensus Statements on Rehabilitation for Patients With COVID‐19: A Systematic Review
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086301 · 2024 · External reference
Language Models Are Few‐Shot Learners
2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
The STARD‐AI Reporting Guideline for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using Artificial Intelligence
10.1038/s41591-025-03953-8 · 2025 · External reference
Optimism Bias Leads to Inconclusive Results: An Empirical Study
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.007 · 2011 · External reference
Expected Value Bias in Routine Third Trimester Growth Scans
10.1002/uog.21929 · 2020 · External reference
Reporting Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines Regarding Gout and Hyperuricemia According to the RIGHT Checklist: Systematic Review
10.1186/s13643-021-01645-1 · 2021 · External reference
Quality and Consistency of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treating Children With COVID‐19
10.21037/atm-20-7000 · 2021 · External reference
Quality Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Physical Restraints in ICU: A Systematic Review
10.21037/apm-21-2851 · 2022 · External reference
Recommendations and Quality of Multimorbidity Guidelines: A Systematic Review
10.1016/j.arr.2024.102559 · 2024 · External reference
Systematic Testing of Three Language Models Reveals Low Language Accuracy, Absence of Response Stability, and a Yes Response Bias
10.1073/pnas.2309583120 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
How to Write Effective Prompts for Large Language Models
10.1038/s41562-024-01847-2 · 2024 · External reference
The CLEAR Path: A Framework for Enhancing Information Literacy Through Prompt Engineering
10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720 · 2023 · External reference
Prompt Engineering as an Important Emerging Skill for Medical Professionals: Tutorial
10.2196/50638 · 2023 · External reference
A Study on Performance Improvement of Prompt Engineering for Generative AI With a Large Language Model
2023 · External reference
