Research graph
References from Existing guidelines and training resources for creating Narrative CVs: a Scoping Review. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Quantitative Research Assessment: Using Metrics against Gamed Metrics.
10.1007/s11739-023-03447-w · 2024 · External reference
Over-Optimization of Academic Publishing Metrics: Observing Goodhart’s Law in Action.
10.1093/gigascience/giz053 · 2019 · External reference
Hundreds of Extreme Self-Citing Scientists Revealed in New Database.
10.1038/d41586-019-02479-7 · 2019 · External reference
The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity.
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737 · 2020 · External reference
Publication Bias in Clinical Research.
10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · 1991 · External reference
Rigor, Impact and Prestige: A Proposed Framework for Evaluating Scholarly Publications.
10.1007/s10755-012-9214-3 · 2012 · External reference
Correction: Empirical Assessment of Published Effect Sizes and Power in the Recent Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology Literature.
10.1371/journal.pbio.3001151 · 2021 · External reference
Bias in Genetic Association Studies and Impact Factor.
10.1038/mp.2008.77 · 2009 · External reference
10.55835/644192caf38f9678c0feaff0
10.55835/644192caf38f9678c0feaff0 · External reference
DORA.
2026 · External reference
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.
10.1038/520429a · 2015 · External reference
CLACSO.
2026 · External reference
SE Signes DORA.
2025 · External reference
Is a Founding Signatory of the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information|UK Reproducibility Network.
External reference
A Practical Guide to Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at Research Performing Organizations.
10.5281/zenodo.15000683 · 2025 · External reference
Exploring the Use of Narrative CVs in the NIHR: A Mixed Method Qualitative Study.
10.3310/nihropenres.1115193.1 · 2022 · External reference
Narrative CVs: How Do They Change Evaluation Practices in Peer Review for Grant Funding?
2024 · External reference
Ten Ways to Improve Academic CVs for Fairer Research Assessment.
10.1057/s41599-021-00929-0 · 2021 · External reference
Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).
2025 · External reference
Update on CIHR’s Transition to the Tri-Agency CV: Message from the Vice-President, Research Programs - CIHR.
External reference
Developing a Narrative CV: Guidance for Researchers.
2025 · External reference
Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.
10.1080/1364557032000119616 · 2005 · External reference
Scoping Studies: Advancing the Methodology.
10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 · 2010 · External reference
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation|Annals of Internal Medicine.
10.7326/m18-0850 · 2025 · External reference
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021 · 2016 · External reference
Airtable: Build Enterprise-Ready AI Workflows, Apps & Agents.
2025 · External reference
What Goes in a Funder’s Narrative CV?: A Scoping Review.
10.12688/f1000research.170507.1 · External reference
Résumé for Researchers CV.
2025 · External reference
Narrative CVs.
External reference
Résumé for Researchers|Royal Society.
2026 · External reference
Narrative CVs in Your Application|Cancer Research UK.
2026 · External reference
Are Narrative CVs Contributing towards Shifting Research Culture? Workshop Report from the 2023 Recognition and Rewards Festival.
10.12688/f1000research.146108.2 · External reference
Narrative CVs Risk Worsening the Biases They Aim to Redress.
External reference
Promoting an Open Research Culture.
10.1126/science.aab2374 · 2015 · External reference
10.17605/osf.io/gnc5e
10.17605/osf.io/gnc5e · 2026 · External reference
