Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Research graph
References from High prevalence of articles with image-related problems in animal studies of subarachnoid hemorrhage and low rates of correction by publishers. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage
10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00938-2 · 2022 · External reference
Early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage: incidence and mechanisms
10.1161/strokeaha.122.040072 · 2023 · External reference
Contemporary management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. An update for the intensivist
10.1007/s00134-024-07387-7 · 2024 · External reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · External reference
PubPeer: scientific assessment without metrics.
10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0015 · 2020 · External reference
Laboratory animals search filter for different literature databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO
10.1177/00236772211045485 · 2022 · External reference
An extra pair of eyes: adopting innovative approaches to detect integrity issues in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology
10.1007/s00210-024-03697-1 · 2025 · External reference
AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers
10.1038/d41586-023-02920-y · 2023 · External reference
The existence of stealth corrections in scientific literature—a threat to scientific integrity
10.1002/leap.1660 · 2025 · External reference
Research progress of early brain injury in subarachnoid hemorrhage from 2004 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis
10.1007/s10143-025-03233-6 · 2025 · External reference
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
10.1161/strokeaha.108.533315 · 2009 · External reference
Mechanisms of early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage
10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600283 · 2006 · External reference
Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literature
10.1038/d41586-024-02747-1 · 2024 · External reference
Sneaked references: fabricated reference metadata distort citation counts
10.1002/asi.24896 · 2024 · External reference
The review mills, not just (self-)plagiarism in review reports, but a step further
10.1007/s11192-024-05125-w · 2024 · External reference
Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg?
10.1007/s11192-024-04960-1 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2025 · External reference
The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications
2016 · External reference
Fraudulent studies are undermining the reliability of systematic reviews: on the prevalence of problematic images in preclinical depression studies
10.1002/1873-3468.70077 · 2025 · External reference
Analysis and correction of inappropriate image duplication: the molecular and cellular biology experience
2018 · External reference
A quantitative study of inappropriate image duplication in the journal toxicology reports
2023 · External reference
Tackling paper mills requires us to prevent future contamination and clean up the past—the case of the journal Bioengineered
10.1080/21655979.2025.2542668 · 2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Detection of plagiarism among rhinology scientific journals
10.1002/alr.23347 · 2024 · External reference
JOURNAL CLUB: plagiarism in manuscripts submitted to the AJR: development of an optimal screening algorithm and management pathways
10.2214/ajr.16.17208 · 2017 · External reference
Prevalence of plagiarism in hijacked journals: a text similarity analysis
2024 · External reference
Misspellings or “miscellings”-non-verifiable and unknown cell lines in cancer research publications
10.1002/ijc.34995 · 2024 · External reference
Verification of nucleotide sequence reagent identities in original publications in high impact factor cancer research journals
10.1007/s00210-023-02846-2 · 2024 · External reference
Review of retracted papers in the field of neurology
10.1111/ene.15960 · 2023 · External reference
China conducts first nationwide review of retractions and research misconduct
10.1038/d41586-024-00397-x · 2024 · External reference
Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China
10.1007/s11192-017-2565-x · 2017 · External reference
Testing hypotheses on risk factors for scientific misconduct via matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications
10.1007/s11948-018-0023-7 · 2019 · External reference
China bans cash rewards for publishing papers
10.1038/d41586-020-00574-8 · 2020 · External reference
Knowledge, attitudes and practices about research misconduct among medical residents in southwest China: a cross-sectional study
10.1186/s12909-024-05277-6 · 2024 · External reference
Research misconduct in China: towards an institutional analysis
10.1177/17470161241247720 · 2024 · External reference
Elite researchers in China say they had “no choice” but to commit misconduct
2024 · External reference
Assessing and raising concerns about duplicate publication, authorship transgressions and data errors in a body of preclinical research
10.1007/s11948-019-00152-w · 2020 · External reference
Correction of scientific literature: too little, too late!
10.1371/journal.pbio.3001572 · 2022 · External reference
The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly
2025 · External reference
Paper trail
10.1126/science.ado0309 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1992 · External reference