Research graph
References from From ideal to practical: Heterogeneity of student-generated variant lists highlights hidden reproducibility gaps. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Why most published research findings are false
2005 · External reference
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
2015 · External reference
The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond
10.1093/bib/bbad375 · 2023 · External reference
Replications in psychology research: how often do they really occur?
10.1177/1745691612460688 · 2012 · External reference
What’s to know about the credibility of empirical economics?
10.1111/joes.12032 · 2013 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015
10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z · 2018 · External reference
Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research
10.1038/483531a · 2012 · External reference
On the low reproducibility of cancer studies
10.1093/nsr/nwy021 · 2018 · External reference
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
10.1038/533452a · 2016 · External reference
Irreproducibility in preclinical biomedical research: perceptions, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps
10.1016/j.tips.2015.12.001 · 2016 · External reference
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
10.7554/elife.04333 · 2014 · External reference
Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
2021 · External reference
10.1038/nrg.2016.49
10.1038/nrg.2016.49 · External reference
Next-generation sequencing and its clinical application
10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0055 · 2019 · External reference
Genomic reproducibility in the bioinformatics era
10.1186/s13059-024-03343-2 · 2024 · External reference
Next-generation DNA sequencing methods
10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359 · 2008 · External reference
Reproducibility efforts as a teaching tool: A pilot study
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010615 · 2022 · External reference
Reprohackathons: promoting reproducibility in bioinformatics through training
10.1093/bioinformatics/btad227 · 2023 · External reference
On genomic repeats and reproducibility
10.1093/bioinformatics/btw139 · 2016 · External reference
The impact of FASTQ and alignment read order on structural variant calling from long-read sequencing data
10.7717/peerj.17101 · 2024 · External reference
Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data
10.1186/s12920-019-0636-y · 2019 · External reference
The Sequencing Quality Control 2 study: establishing community standards for sequencing in precision medicine
10.1186/s13059-021-02528-3 · 2021 · External reference
COSAP: comparative sequencing analysis platform
10.1186/s12859-024-05756-z · 2024 · External reference
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · 2010 · External reference
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
10.1038/nmeth.1923 · 2012 · External reference
Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples
10.1038/nbt.2514 · 2013 · External reference
SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data
10.1093/bioinformatics/btr665 · 2012 · External reference
Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants
10.1038/s41592-018-0051-x · 2018 · External reference
Establishing community reference samples, data and call sets for benchmarking cancer mutation detection using whole-genome sequencing
10.1038/s41587-021-00993-6 · 2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
10.4135/9781412983419
10.4135/9781412983419 · External reference
