References

Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911 · 2020 · External reference

Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience

10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9 · 2005 · External reference

Provider experience and the comparative safety of laparoscopic and open colectomy

10.1111/1475-6773.12482 · 2017 · External reference

Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve?

10.1097/dcr.0b013e318285b810 · 2013 · External reference

Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role?

10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181d32096 · 2010 · External reference

Cost-effectiveness evaluation of laparoscopic versus robotic minimally invasive colectomy

10.1097/sla.0000000000003196 · 2020 · External reference

Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience

10.1007/s00464-011-1977-6 · 2012 · External reference

Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer

10.1245/s10434-010-1479-0 · 2011 · External reference

Minimally invasive surgery in gastrointestinal cancer: benefits, challenges, and solutions for underutilization

10.4293/jsls.2014.00134 · 2014 · External reference

The Presence of a cost-volume relationship in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lung resections

10.1097/sla.0000000000005699 · 2023 · External reference

Defining a hospital volume threshold for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States

10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4753 · 2017 · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data

10.1097/mlr.0b013e31819432e5 · 2009 · External reference

Impact of chronic lymphocytic leukemia on outcomes and readmissions after cardiac operations

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.059 · 2022 · External reference

Unresolved reference

2021 · External reference

Entropy balancing for causal effects: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies

10.1093/pan/mpr025 · 2012 · External reference

Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on mortality, length of stay, and cost of pancreaticoduodenectomy

10.1007/s11605-013-2422-z · 2014 · External reference

The volume-outcome relationship in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study using propensity score matching

10.1007/s00464-013-2867-x · 2013 · External reference

Does surgical volume influence short-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy?

10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.070 · 2010 · External reference

Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy

10.1007/s00595-008-4052-8 · 2009 · External reference

Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.048 · 2016 · External reference

Reducing cost and improving operating room efficiency: examination of surgical instrument processing

10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.038 · 2018 · External reference

Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery

10.1007/s00464-010-1281-x · 2011 · External reference

Outcome comparisons between high-volume robotic and laparoscopic surgeons in a large healthcare system

10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.034 · 2017 · External reference

Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume

10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.390 · 2013 · External reference

Does the volume-outcome association in pancreas cancer surgery justify regionalization of care? A review of current controversies

10.1245/s10434-021-10765-w · 2022 · External reference

Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection

10.1097/00000658-199909000-00013 · 1999 · External reference

Does surgeon case volume influence nonfatal adverse outcomes after rectal cancer resection?

10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.042 · 2008 · External reference

National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes

10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1 · 2022 · External reference

Surgical complexity and outcome during the implementation phase of a robotic colorectal surgery program-a retrospective cohort study

10.3389/fonc.2020.603216 · 2021 · External reference

Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy

10.1002/bjs.8841 · 2012 · External reference

The impact of robotic surgery on a tertiary care colorectal surgery program, an assessment of costs and short term outcomes: a Canadian perspective

10.1007/s00464-022-09059-3 · 2022 · External reference

Is robotic surgery cost-effective: yes

10.1097/mou.0b013e32834d543f · 2012 · External reference

The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States

10.1056/nejmsa022615 · 2003 · External reference