Research graph
References from A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Policy and governance perspectives for regulation of genome edited crops in the United States
10.3389/fpls.2018.01606 · 2018 · External reference
Plants developed by new genetic modification techniques-comparison of existing regulatory frameworks in the EU and non-EU countries
10.3389/fbioe.2019.00026 · 2019 · External reference
An overview of regulatory approaches to genome editing in agriculture
10.1016/j.biori.2019.07.001 · 2019 · External reference
Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing
10.1002/fes3.161 · 2019 · External reference
10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_7
10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_7 · 2019 · External reference
Broadening the GMO risk assessment in the EU for genome editing technologies in agriculture
10.1186/s12302-020-00361-2 · 2020 · External reference
The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture: Many countries have exempted or move to exempt forms of genome editing from GMO regulation of crop plants
10.15252/embr.202050680 · 2020 · External reference
Towards social acceptability of genome-edited plants in industrialised countries? Emerging evidence from Europe, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan
10.3389/fgeed.2022.899331 · 2022 · External reference
Divergence and convergence in international regulatory policies regarding genome-edited food: How to find a middle ground
10.3389/fpls.2023.1105426 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Implications and lessons from the introduction of genome-edited food products in Japan
10.3389/fgeed.2022.899154 · 2022 · External reference
Performativity of expectations
2020 · External reference
10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_6
10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_6 · 2019 · External reference
Regulatory status of genome-edited organisms under the Japanese Cartagena act
10.3389/fbioe.2019.00387 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · 2013 · External reference
10.3152/147154305781779236
10.3152/147154305781779236 · External reference
Public engagement in Japanese policy-making: A history of the genetically modified organisms debate
10.1080/14636770902901454 · 2009 · External reference
The GM public debate: Context and communication strategies
10.1038/nrg1182 · 2003 · External reference
Report. UK GM Dialogue: Separating Social and Scientific Issues
10.1177/1075547004273091 · 2005 · External reference
Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision making: The case of the 2003 British GM nation? Public debate
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00603.x · 2005 · External reference
Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: Reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public debate about transgenic crops
10.1177/0963662505056611 · 2005 · External reference
On evaluating the GM Nation? Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain
10.1080/14636770601032858 · 2006 · External reference
Citizen engagement processes as information systems: The role of knowledge and the concept of translation quality
10.1177/0963662506074792 · 2007 · External reference
10.4324/9780203945933
10.4324/9780203945933 · 2007 · External reference
Public dialogue on genome editing food
2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most
10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2002 · External reference
Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks
10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00079-5 · 2003 · External reference
Effects of context and feelings on perceptions of genetically modified food
10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00532.x · 2004 · External reference
Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes
10.1177/0963662504042690 · 2004 · External reference
10.1515/9781400837311
10.1515/9781400837311 · 2005 · External reference
Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis
10.1177/0963662506070159 · 2008 · External reference
Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon
10.1371/journal.pone.0086174 · 2014 · External reference
Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics
10.1073/pnas.1704882114 · 2017 · External reference
Regulatory uncertainty around new breeding techniques
10.3389/fpls.2018.01291 · 2018 · External reference
How should we regulate products of new breeding techniques? Opinion of surveyed experts in plant biotechnology
10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00460 · 2020 · External reference
Public acceptance of GMOs: Portraying variable terrain
2013 · External reference
Consumer awareness on governance of gene edited products: Agricultural and food application
2017 · External reference
Different genomic technologies applied for plant breeding influence differently on perples’s risk perceptions
2017 · External reference
Expert and public perceptions of gene-edited crops: Attitude changes in relation to scientific knowledge
10.1057/s41599-019-0328-4 · 2019 · External reference
Consumer acceptance of genome edited foods in Japan
10.3390/su15129662 · 2023 · External reference
A comparative analysis of attitudes on communication toward stem cell research and regenerative medicine between the public and the scientific community
10.1002/sctm.17-0184 · 2018 · External reference
A comparative analysis of attitudes toward stem cell research and regenerative medicine between six countries—A pilot study
10.1016/j.reth.2022.04.007 · 2022 · External reference
Attitude toward nuclear power plant and its public relations
1994 · External reference
The Japanese attitude towards nuclear power generation- changes as seen through time series
1999 · External reference
Familiarity and prudence of the Japanese public with research into induced pluripotent stem cells, and their desire for its proper regulation
10.1007/s12015-009-9111-z · 2010 · External reference
Science communication in regenerative medicine: Implications for the role of academic society and science policy
10.1016/j.reth.2017.11.001 · 2017 · External reference
