Research graph
References from Accumulating evidence across studies: Consistent methods protect against false findings produced by p-hacking. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
10.1002/9781119095910.ch2
10.1002/9781119095910.ch2 · 2017 · External reference
Why most published research findings are false.
10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · 2005 · External reference
Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined
10.1177/1745691612463401 · 2012 · External reference
False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant
10.1177/0956797611417632 · 2011 · External reference
The rules of the game called psychological science
10.1177/1745691612459060 · 2012 · External reference
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
10.1371/journal.pone.0263023 · 2022 · External reference
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling
10.1177/0956797611430953 · 2012 · External reference
Is n-hacking ever ok? The consequences of collecting more data in pursuit of statistical significance
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002345 · 2023 · External reference
A revised and expanded taxonomy for understanding heterogeneity in research and reporting practices.
External reference
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer
10.1037/a0033242 · 2014 · External reference
Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them
10.1177/2515245920952393 · 2020 · External reference
Are most published social psychological findings false
10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.017 · 2016 · External reference
Evaluating Research in Personality and Social Psychology: Considerations of Statistical Power and Concerns About False Findings.
10.1177/01461672211030811 · 2022 · External reference
Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
2017 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results
10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009 · 2016 · External reference
Single-paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory testing, and replicability
10.1093/jcr/ucw085 · 2017 · External reference
Most published research findings are false—But a little replication goes a long way.
2017 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2011 · External reference
Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability
10.1177/1745691614529796 · 2014 · External reference
Further considerations on conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results
10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.003 · 2017 · External reference
Psychology’s renaissance.
10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836 · 2018 · External reference
HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known.
10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 · 1998 · External reference
Understanding data when interactions are present or hypothesized
10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00368.x · 1996 · External reference
Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification
10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.874 · 1976 · External reference
Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion
10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847 · 1981 · External reference
Preregistration is hard, and worthwhile.
10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009 · 2019 · External reference
Is preregistration worthwhile?
10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.009 · 2020 · External reference
A validity-based framework for understanding replication in psychology.
10.1177/1088868320931366 · 2020 · External reference
Benefits of open and high-powered research outweigh costs
10.1037/pspi0000049 · 2017 · External reference
The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles
10.1037/a0029487 · 2012 · External reference
