Research graph
References from Gender differences in representation, citations, and h-index: An empirical examination of the field of communication across the ten most productive countries. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
The productivity puzzle
1984 · External reference
Gender, science, and academic rank: Key issues and approaches.
10.1162/qss_a_00057 · 2020 · External reference
Unraveling the gender productivity gap in science: A meta-analytical review
10.1098/rsos.181566 · 2019 · External reference
Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country
10.1007/s11192-020-03733-w · 2020 · External reference
Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science
10.1038/504211a · 2013 · External reference
The Matilda effect—Role congruity effects on scholarly communication: A citation analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication articles
10.1177/0093650211418339 · 2013 · External reference
The Matilda effect in science communication: An experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest
10.1177/1075547012472684 · 2013 · External reference
The Matilda effect in communication research: The effects of gender and geography on usage and citations across 11 countries.
2023 · External reference
El efecto Matilda en la red de coautorías hispanoamericana en comunicación
10.14198/medcom.18971 · 2021 · External reference
Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments
10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127 · 2006 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2015 · External reference
Stereotypes about gender and science: Women ≠ scientists
10.1177/0361684315622645 · 2016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2020 · External reference
Structural obstacles for women in academia
2021 · External reference
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders
10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573 · 2002 · External reference
Turbulent academic journey of female academics: A meta-synthesis.
10.1080/13603116.2023.2227862 · 2023 · External reference
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 · 2007 · External reference
Exploring gender bias in six key domains of academic science: An adversarial collaboration
10.1177/15291006231163179 · 2023 · External reference
The Matthew/Matilda effect in science
10.1177/030631293023002004 · 1993 · External reference
Voices about choices: The role of female networks in affirming life choices in the academy
10.1080/07491409.2004.10162467 · 2004 · External reference
10.4324/9781315095899-3
10.4324/9781315095899-3 · 2017 · External reference
Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics
10.1038/s41567-022-01770-1 · 2022 · External reference
Career development of women in academia: Traversing the leaky pipeline
10.15241/ceg.4.4.332 · 2014 · External reference
Gender equality in the ivory tower, and how best to achieve it.
2014 · External reference
Gender bias in international relations graduate education? New evidence from syllabi.
2017 · External reference
10.7208/chicago/9780226261904.003.0006
10.7208/chicago/9780226261904.003.0006 · 2009 · External reference
Gendered citation practices in the field of communication
10.1080/23808985.2021.1960180 · 2021 · External reference
El rol de la mujer en la ciencia y la docencia en comunicación: Análisis a partir de los programas universitarios en España
10.26441/rc21.2-2022-a5 · 2022 · External reference
Checking up on The Invasion from Mars: Hadley Cantril, Paul Lazarsfeld, and the making of a misremembered classic
External reference
Thinking dirty”: Digging up three founding “matriarchs” of communication Studies
10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01398.x · 2012 · External reference
The founding mothers of communication research: Toward a history of a gendered assemblage
10.1080/15295036.2013.849355 · 2014 · External reference
10.4324/9781315074955
10.4324/9781315074955 · 2022 · External reference
Including female voices in the stories we tell about communication research: Memories and narratives of women in academia
10.1093/ct/qtac002 · 2022 · External reference
What is the harm in gendered citation practices?
10.1086/705495 · 2019 · External reference
Scientific journal impact indexes and indicators for measuring researchers’ performance
2010 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2004 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2000 · External reference
The meaning of the h-index
10.1016/s1697-2600(14)70050-x · 2014 · External reference
Forewarned is forearmed: the h-index as a scientometric
10.1080/08820538.2021.1894889 · 2021 · External reference
Who climbs the academic ladder? Race and gender stratification in a world of whiteness
10.1177/0034644618813667 · 2018 · External reference
Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa
10.1371/journal.pone.0240903 · 2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
1991 · External reference
Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia
10.2527/1996.74112843x · 1996 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2013 · External reference
Gender and status in American political science: Who determines whether a scholar is noteworthy?
10.1017/s1537592719004985 · 2020 · External reference
10.1007/978-981-13-3685-0
10.1007/978-981-13-3685-0 · 2019 · External reference
Performance of gender detection tools: A comparative study of name-to-gender inference services
10.5195/jmla.2021.1185 · 2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2015 · External reference
From victims to economic assets
10.32376/d895a0ea.6e09b010 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2016 · External reference
