References

When and why to replicate: As easy as 1, 2, 3?

2019 · External reference

Unresolved reference

2020 · External reference

Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics

10.1126/science.aaf0918 · 2016 · External reference

PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

10.1126/science.aac4716 · 2015 · External reference

How Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project

10.1177/0956797619831612 · 2019 · External reference

Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology

2021 · External reference

Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication

10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012 · 2016 · External reference

Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings

10.1177/2515245918810225 · 2018 · External reference

Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project

10.1027/1864-9335/a000178 · 2014 · External reference

10.1525/collabra.35271

10.1525/collabra.35271 · 2022 · External reference

New Statistical Metrics for Multisite Replication Projects

10.1111/rssa.12572 · 2020 · External reference

The statistics of replication

10.1027/1614-2241/a000173 · 2019 · External reference

Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication

10.3758/s13428-017-0967-6 · 2018 · External reference

Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study

2017 · External reference

The assessment of replicability using the sum of p-values

10.1098/rsos.240149 · 2024 · External reference

What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science

10.1177/1745691616646366 · 2016 · External reference

Small telescopes: detectability and the evaluation of replication results

10.1177/0956797614567341 · 2015 · External reference

Correspondence measures for assessing replication success

10.1037/met0000597 · 2025 · External reference

Bayesian tests to quantify the result of a replication attempt

10.1037/a0036731 · 2014 · External reference

A New Standard for the Analysis and Design of Replication Studies

10.1111/rssa.12493 · 2019 · External reference

More Than One Replication Study Is Needed for Unambiguous Tests of Replication

10.3102/1076998619852953 · 2019 · External reference

An evaluation of statistical methods for aggregate patterns of replication failure

10.1214/20-aoas1387 · 2021 · External reference

Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments

10.1037/bul0000232 · 2020 · External reference

Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication

10.1037/met0000302 · 2021 · External reference

Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives

10.1037/met0000189 · 2019 · External reference

On the Accuracy of Replication Failure Rates

10.1080/00273171.2022.2066500 · 2023 · External reference

How best to quantify replication success? A simulation study on the comparison of replication success metrics

10.1098/rsos.201697 · 2021 · External reference

Replication Success Under Questionable Research Practices—a Simulation Study

10.1214/23-sts904 · 2023 · External reference

Assessing replication success: a taxonomy and systematic comparison of replication success measures for prospective replications

10.1098/rsos.252263 · 2026 · External reference

A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis

10.1002/jrsm.12 · 2010 · External reference

10.1002/0470870168

10.1002/0470870168 · 2005 · External reference

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences

10.1038/s41586-025-10078-y · 2026 · External reference

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences

10.1038/s41586-026-10203-5 · 2026 · External reference

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences

10.1038/s41586-025-09844-9 · 2026 · External reference

Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE)

2021 · External reference

There’s more than one way to conduct a replication study: Beyond statistical significance

10.1037/met0000051 · 2016 · External reference

The assessment of replication success based on relative effect size

10.1214/21-aoas1502 · 2022 · External reference

How to quantify the evidence for the absence of a correlation

10.3758/s13428-015-0593-0 · 2016 · External reference

The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments

10.2307/3001666 · 1954 · External reference

Bayes factor functions for reporting outcomes of hypothesis tests

10.1073/pnas.2217331120 · 2023 · External reference

Meta-analyzing nonpreregistered and preregistered studies

2025 · External reference

Unresolved reference

1988 · External reference

On the ’probable error’ of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample

1921 · External reference

Effect Sizes For Meta-analysis

10.7758/9781610448864.14 · 2019 · External reference

Bayes Factors

10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · 1995 · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

10.32614/cran.package.bff

10.32614/cran.package.bff · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters

10.21105/joss.02815 · 2020 · External reference

Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences

10.1037/a0015108 · 2009 · External reference

A power primer

10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · 1992 · External reference

The Value of Direct Replication

10.1177/1745691613514755 · 2014 · External reference

The end justifies all means: questionable conversion of different effect sizes to a common effect size measure

10.1080/2153599x.2022.2070249 · 2022 · External reference