Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Research graph
References from OphthoEvidence Report: Comparative effects of treatments for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: A protocol for a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30393-5 · 2017 · External reference
Age-related macular degeneration
10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31550-2 · 2018 · External reference
Geographic atrophy: clinical features and potential therapeutic approaches
10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.023 · 2014 · External reference
Relationship between RPE and choriocapillaris in age-related macular degeneration
10.1167/iovs.09-3639 · 2009 · External reference
The Progression of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.038 · 2018 · External reference
Characterizing Disease Burden and Progression of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.036 · 2018 · External reference
How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011504 · 2016 · External reference
Cognitive impairment in age-related macular degeneration and geographic atrophy
10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.04.026 · 2012 · External reference
Pegcetacoplan for the treatment of geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (OAKS and DERBY): two multicentre, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, phase 3 trials
10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01520-9 · 2023 · External reference
C5 Inhibitor Avacincaptad Pegol for Geographic Atrophy Due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Pivotal Phase 2/3 Trial
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.027 · 2021 · External reference
Efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol in patients with geographic atrophy (GATHER2): 12-month results from a randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trial
10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01583-0 · 2023 · External reference
Treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration: A review
10.1111/ceo.14294 · 2023 · External reference
Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on
10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31592-6 · 2017 · External reference
Complement inhibitors for age-related macular degeneration
2023 · External reference
The effect of complement C3 or C5 inhibition on geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: A living systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.11.008 · 2024 · External reference
Efficacy and safety of complement inhibitors in patients with geographic atrophy associated with age-related macular degeneration: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
10.3389/fphar.2024.1410172 · 2024 · External reference
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration
2020 · External reference
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · 2015 · External reference
OphthoEvidence Report: Comparative effects of treatments for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: a protocol for a living systematic review and network meta-analysis
2026 · External reference
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations
10.7326/m14-2385 · 2015 · External reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · External reference
Chapter 23: Including variants on randomized trials [last updated October 2019].
2024 · External reference
Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching
10.1002/jrsm.1563 · 2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire
10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050 · 2001 · External reference
Development of ROBUST-RCT: Risk Of Bias instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials
10.1136/bmj-2024-081199 · 2025 · External reference
Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect [last updated August 2023]
2024 · External reference
Chapter 10: Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses [last updated November 2024]
2024 · External reference
Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements
10.1097/iae.0b013e3181d87e04 · 2010 · External reference
Network Meta-analysis
10.1177/1536867x1501500403 · 2015 · External reference
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
10.1002/jrsm.1316 · 2019 · External reference
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
10.1002/jrsm.1044 · 2012 · External reference
Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
10.1002/sim.3767 · 2010 · External reference
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression
10.1002/jrsm.1045 · 2012 · External reference
Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses
10.1503/cmaj.200077 · 2020 · External reference
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017 · 2011 · External reference
GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE’s approach to addressing inconsistency
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.003 · 2023 · External reference
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.025 · 2019 · External reference
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
2011 · External reference
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · 1997 · External reference
A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis
10.1136/bmj.g5630 · 2014 · External reference
Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.005 · 2018 · External reference
GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.026 · 2021 · External reference
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias)
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 · 2011 · External reference
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014 · 2011 · External reference
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011 · 2011 · External reference
Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation concept article 5: addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.010 · 2023 · External reference
GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.011 · 2021 · External reference
GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework
2020 · External reference
Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010 · 2017 · External reference
Proposed triggers for retiring a living systematic review
10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112100 · 2023 · External reference