Research graph
References from A spatially explicit dynamic biomass baseline for forest-management carbon projects in China. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Comprehensive review of carbon quantification by improved forest management offset protocols
10.3389/ffgc.2023.958879 · 2023 · External reference
China certified emission reduction projects: historical and current status, development, and future prospects—taking forestry projects as an example
10.3390/su17083284 · 2025 · External reference
Forestry offsets under China’s certificated emission reduction (CCER) for carbon neutrality: regulatory gaps and the ways forward
10.1108/ijccsm-04-2022-0047 · 2024 · External reference
Key challenges and approaches to addressing barriers in forest carbon offset projects
10.1007/s11676-022-01488-z · 2022 · External reference
Dynamic ex-post baselines for enhancing the credibility of improved forest management carbon offsets
10.1021/acs.est.5c11387 · 2026 · External reference
Science-based approach for credible accounting of mitigation in managed forests
10.1186/s13021-018-0096-2 · 2018 · External reference
On the importance of baseline setting in carbon offsets markets
10.1007/s10584-016-1685-2 · 2016 · External reference
Systematic over-crediting in California's forest carbon offsets program
10.1111/gcb.15943 · 2022 · External reference
What is the risk of overestimating emission reductions from forests – and what can be done about it?
10.1007/s10584-021-03079-z · 2021 · External reference
Maximizing carbon sequestration potential in Chinese forests through optimal management
10.1038/s41467-024-47143-5 · 2024 · External reference
Age-dependence of stand biomass in managed boreal forests based on the Finnish National Forest Inventory data
10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119507 · 2021 · External reference
Additionality, baselines, and the proper accounting for land-based climate change mitigation efforts
10.1093/oxfclm/kgae012 · 2024 · External reference
Using remote sensing to quantify the additional climate benefits of California forest carbon offset projects
10.1111/gcb.16380 · 2022 · External reference
Little evidence of management change in California’s forest offset program
10.1038/s43247-023-00984-2 · 2023 · External reference
Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation
10.1126/science.ade3535 · 2023 · External reference
California’s forest carbon offsets buffer pool is severely undercapitalized
10.3389/ffgc.2022.930426 · 2022 · External reference
Forest carbon protocols underestimate climate-driven carbon loss risks
10.1038/s41586-026-10571-y · 2026 · External reference
Bayesian state-space synthetic control method for deforestation baseline estimation for forest carbon credits
10.1017/eds.2024.5 · 2024 · External reference
Carbon storage through China’s planted forest expansion
10.1038/s41467-024-48546-0 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2018 · External reference
Maps with 1 km resolution reveal increases in above- and belowground forest biomass carbon pools in China over the past 20 years
10.5194/essd-15-897-2023 · 2023 · External reference
Species-specific relationships between net primary productivity and forest age for subtropical China
10.5194/bg-22-5705-2025 · 2025 · External reference
Restoring credibility in carbon offsets through systematic ex post evaluation
10.1038/s41893-025-01589-7 · 2025 · External reference
Strengthening the integrity of REDD+ credits: objectively assessing counterfactual methods using placebos
10.1088/1748-9326/ae0f44 · 2025 · External reference
China’s current forest age structure will lead to weakened carbon sinks in the near future
2023 · External reference
Forest management required for consistent carbon sink in China’s forest plantations
10.1186/s40663-021-00335-7 · 2021 · External reference
Forest management in southern China generates short term extensive carbon sequestration
10.1038/s41467-019-13798-8 · 2020 · External reference
Forest aging limits future carbon sink in China
10.1016/j.oneear.2024.04.011 · 2024 · External reference
Impact of modelling choices on setting the reference levels for the EU forest carbon sinks: how do different assumptions affect the country-specific forest reference levels?
10.1186/s13021-019-0125-9 · 2019 · External reference
How to fit nonlinear plant growth models and calculate growth rates: an update for ecologists
10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00155.x · 2012 · External reference
Potential biases in estimating the rate parameter of sigmoid growth functions
10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00055.x · 2011 · External reference
Improved estimates of site index curves using a varying-parameter model
1985 · External reference
Generalized algebraic difference approach: theory-based derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes
2000 · External reference
Spatio-temporal prediction of site index based on forest inventories and climate change scenarios
10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.018 · 2012 · External reference
Site index estimation for clonal eucalypt plantations in Brazil: a modelling approach refined by environmental variables
10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118079 · 2020 · External reference
Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential
10.1038/s41586-023-06723-z · 2023 · External reference
Carbon carrying capacity in primary forests shows potential for mitigation achieving the European Green Deal 2030 target
10.1038/s43247-024-01416-5 · 2024 · External reference
Forecasting landscape-level carbon sequestration using gridded, spatially adjusted tree growth
10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.013 · 2004 · External reference
Forest carbon sequestration on the west coast, USA: role of species, productivity and stockability
10.1371/journal.pone.0302823 · 2024 · External reference
Influence of site index on the relationship between forest net primary productivity and stand age
10.1371/journal.pone.0177084 · 2017 · External reference
Parameter identifiability and model selection for sigmoid population growth models
10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110998 · 2022 · External reference
Systematic assessment of the achieved emission reductions of carbon crediting projects
10.1038/s41467-024-53645-z · 2024 · External reference
Evaluating protocols and standards for forest carbon-offset programs, part A: additionality, baselines and permanence
2012 · External reference
Baseline manipulation in voluntary carbon offset programs
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.014 · 2017 · External reference
Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: insights from California’s standardized approach
10.1080/14693062.2020.1781035 · 2020 · External reference
Improved assessment of baseline and additionality for forest carbon crediting
10.1002/eap.2817 · 2023 · External reference
Implication of the new VCS jurisdictional and nested REDD methodology on baselines of existing avoided deforestation projects
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119857 · 2024 · External reference
Uncertainties in deforestation emission baseline methodologies and implications for carbon markets
10.1038/s41467-023-44127-9 · 2023 · External reference
Forest carbon leakage quantification methods and their suitability for assessing leakage in REDD
10.3390/f3010033 · 2012 · External reference
Understanding and managing leakage in forest–based greenhouse–gas–mitigation projects
10.1098/rsta.2002.1040 · 2002 · External reference
Tamm review: influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: a knowledge synthesis
10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127 · 2020 · External reference
Carbon carry capacity and carbon sequestration potential in China based on an integrated analysis of mature forest biomass
10.1007/s11427-014-4776-1 · 2014 · External reference
Modelling site index of Chinese fir plantations using a random effects model across regional site types in Hunan province, China
10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.039 · 2019 · External reference
A comprehensive framework for assessing the accuracy and uncertainty of global above-ground biomass maps
10.1016/j.rse.2022.112917 · 2022 · External reference
The importance of consistent global forest aboveground biomass product validation
10.1007/s10712-019-09538-8 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2013 · External reference
Unveiling China’s natural and planted forest spatial–temporal dynamics from 1990 to 2020
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.01.024 · 2024 · External reference
C. A unified approach to the Richards-model family for use in growth analyses: why we need only two model forms
10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.09.008 · 2010 · External reference
China’s annual forest age dataset at a 30 m spatial resolution from 1986 to 2022
10.5194/essd-17-3219-2025 · 2025 · External reference
Dynamics of China’s forest carbon storage: the first 30 m annual aboveground biomass mapping from 1985 to 2023
10.5194/essd-17-6993-2025 · 2025 · External reference
Global annual forest management type spatial data (2001–2020)
10.11888/terre.tpdc.300975 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty
10.5194/soil-7-217-2021 · 2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2026 · External reference
List and Vector Boundaries of Nature Reserves in China, version 1
10.5281/zenodo.14875797 · 2024 · External reference
Unveiling spatiotemporal tree cover patterns in China: the first 30 m annual tree cover mapping from 1985 to 2023
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.08.001 · 2024 · External reference
A revised above-ground maximum biomass layer for the Australian continent
10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.011 · 2019 · External reference
Maximum potential of vegetation carbon sink in Chinese forests
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167325 · 2023 · External reference
