References

Published peer review reports have higher informative content than unpublished reports

10.1016/j.joi.2025.101760 · 2026 · External reference

Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline

10.5465/amle.2004.13500489 · 2004 · External reference

The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals

10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001 · 2013 · External reference

Scholarly communication and bibliometrics

10.1002/aris.1440360102 · 2002 · External reference

Scientific peer review

10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112 · 2011 · External reference

Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers

10.1162/qss_a_00068 · 2020 · External reference

Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication

10.1007/s11192-007-1950-2 · 2008 · External reference

Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science

10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285 · 2016 · External reference

Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals

10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.002 · 2018 · External reference

Information as thing

10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199106)42:5<351::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-3 · 1991 · External reference

Development and application of a comprehensive glossary for the identification of statistical and methodological concepts in peer review reports

10.1016/j.joi.2024.101555 · 2024 · External reference

Dynamic disruption index across citation and cited references windows: Recommendations for thresholds in research evaluation

10.1002/asi.70053 · 2026 · External reference

A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

10.1177/001316446002000104 · 1960 · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies

10.1177/0003122415601618 · 2015 · External reference

A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change

10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366 · 2017 · External reference

10.1073/pnas.2305016120

10.1073/pnas.2305016120 · 2023 · External reference

10.1002/pra2.607

10.1002/pra2.607 · 2022 · External reference

Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of ‘Voting’ in Peer Review

10.1177/0306312709335405 · 2010 · External reference

10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5 · 2018 · Admitted local publication

Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review

10.1001/jama.287.21.2786 · 2002 · External reference

Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies

10.1002/14651858.mr000016.pub3 · 2007 · External reference

10.18653/v1/n18-1149

10.18653/v1/n18-1149 · 2018 · External reference

10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001

10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · 2012 · External reference

10.4159/9780674054158

10.4159/9780674054158 · 2009 · External reference

Bias in peer review

10.1002/asi.22784 · 2013 · External reference

What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature

10.1007/s11192-023-04873-5 · 2024 · External reference

Bias against scientific novelty: A prepublication perspective

10.1002/asi.24725 · 2023 · External reference

New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord

10.1016/j.joi.2021.101234 · 2022 · External reference

SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science research

10.1038/s41597-023-02198-9 · 2023 · External reference

Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties

10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7 · 1985 · External reference

Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers

10.1002/asi.22798 · 2013 · External reference

Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time

10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x · 2023 · External reference

Unresolved reference

External reference

The disruption index is biased by citation inflation

10.1162/qss_a_00333 · 2024 · External reference

Unresolved reference

2026 · External reference

10.12688/f1000research.11369.2

10.12688/f1000research.11369.2 · 2017 · External reference

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action

10.1371/journal.pbio.3002255 · 2023 · External reference

10.1073/pnas.1418218112

10.1073/pnas.1418218112 · 2015 · External reference

A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks

10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · 2009 · External reference

10.1002/asi.24582

10.1002/asi.24582 · 2022 · External reference

The fading of status bias during the open peer review process

10.1016/j.joi.2024.101528 · 2024 · External reference

Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact

10.1126/science.1240474 · 2013 · External reference

On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators

10.1002/asi.22775 · 2013 · External reference

Bias against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators

10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006 · 2017 · External reference

Open peer review: Promoting transparency in open science

10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4 · 2020 · External reference

Unresolved reference

2010 · External reference

Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology

10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9 · 2019 · External reference

Automated novelty evaluation of academic paper: A collaborative approach integrating human and large language model knowledge

10.1002/asi.70005 · 2025 · External reference

Does language bias GenAI academic evaluation in humanities and social sciences? A mixed-methods study based on Chinese‐language HSS papers

10.1002/asi.70079 · 2026 · External reference