Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Research graph
References from Development of the systematic review duplication (SRD) tool: a protocol for assessing duplication in intervention-based systematic reviews. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
History of evidence-based medicine
10.4103/0970-1591.91438 · 2011 · External reference
Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making
10.1097/eja.0b013e32833a560a · 2010 · External reference
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study
10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028 · 2016 · External reference
Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000‒2019
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.022 · 2021 · External reference
High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study
10.1093/bjs/znab328 · 2021 · External reference
Multiple overlapping systematic reviews facilitate the origin of disputes: the case of thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.012 · 2018 · External reference
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.012
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.012 · External reference
Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science
10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 · 2022 · External reference
Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
10.1136/bmj.f4501 · 2013 · External reference
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.024
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.024 · External reference
Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews
10.1186/s13643-023-02191-8 · 2023 · External reference
Replication, duplication, and waste in a quarter million systematic reviews and meta-analyses
10.1161/circoutcomes.118.005212 · 2018 · External reference
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': a meta-research study of research waste
10.1002/jrsm.1542 · 2022 · External reference
10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112125
10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112125 · External reference
The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses
10.1111/1468-0009.12210 · 2016 · External reference
10.1136/bmj.n71
10.1136/bmj.n71 · External reference
10.1136/bmj.j4008
10.1136/bmj.j4008 · External reference
ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005 · 2016 · External reference
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study
10.1017/rsm.2024.14 · 2025 · External reference
The EQUATOR network and reporting guidelines: helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies
10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.011 · 2009 · External reference
A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6 · 2017 · External reference
Integration of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine with modern biomedicine: the scientization, evidence, and challenges for integration of traditional Chinese medicine
10.1097/hm9.0000000000000089 · 2024 · External reference