Research graph
References from Cost-effectiveness of full-endoscopic, unilateral biportal endoscopic, and microscopic decompression for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a 2-year comparative analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2020 · External reference
United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions
2005 · External reference
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis
2016 · External reference
Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis
1999 · External reference
Microsurgery of acquired degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Bilateral over-the-top decompression through unilateral approach
2003 · External reference
Full-endoscopic versus microscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis at L4-L5: comparative study
2022 · External reference
Indications, contraindications, and complications of biportal endoscopic decompressive surgery for the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a systematic review
2022 · External reference
Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
2015 · External reference
Full endoscopic, bilateral over-the-top decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
2018 · External reference
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36
2002 · External reference
Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy using a new 8.4-mm endoscope and nerve root retractor
2020 · External reference
Can percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery achieve enough canal decompression for degenerative lumbar stenosis? Prospective case-control study
2018 · External reference
Pain improvement and reoperation rate after full-endoscopic decompression for lateral recess stenosis: a 10-year follow-up
2023 · External reference
Efficacy and safety of unilateral interlaminar endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study of 176 cases with a 3-6 year follow-up
2025 · External reference
Comparison of surgical invasiveness between microdiscectomy and 3 different endoscopic discectomy techniques for lumbar disc herniation
2018 · External reference
Cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy versus endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation
2019 · External reference
What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule?
2008 · External reference
The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means
2008 · External reference
How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations
1992 · External reference
Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses comparing open and minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery
2022 · External reference
Cost analysis comparison between conventional microsurgical decompression and full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery
2020 · External reference
A simple cost-effectiveness analysis of bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus instrumented total laminectomy and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
2019 · External reference
Lumbar decompression with and without fusion for lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis: a cost utility analysis
2024 · External reference
Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: a national study utilizing the national health insurance database
2024 · External reference
Economic comparisons of endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review
2023 · External reference
Economic value in minimally invasive spine surgery
2019 · External reference
