Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Research graph
References from How listeners evaluate credibility in science podcasts: a qualitative focus group study of affective closeness and cognitive transparency. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Podcasting: considering the evolution of the medium and its association with the word ‘radio’
10.1386/rjao.14.1.7_1 · 2016 · External reference
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion
10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · 1980 · External reference
Theorizing podcast journalism: toward a medium-specific framework for audio reporting
10.3390/journalmedia7010002 · 2026 · External reference
Immersive audio storytelling: podcasting and serial documentary in the digital publishing industry
10.1080/19376529.2018.1509218 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2023 · External reference
Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics
10.1073/pnas.1317505111 · 2014 · External reference
Intimacy in podcast journalism: ethical challenges and opportunities in Daily News podcasts and documentaries
10.17645/mac.8994 · 2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Parasocial interaction: a review of the literature and a model for future research
10.1207/s1532785xmep0403_04 · 2002 · External reference
Measuring laypeople’s trust in experts in a digital age: the muenster epistemic trustworthiness inventory (METI)
10.1371/journal.pone.0139309 · 2015 · External reference
Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance
10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · 1956 · External reference
Science communication and public trust in science
10.1080/03080188.2022.2152244 · 2023 · External reference
Trust in pod: listener trust of news content heard on different genre podcasts
10.17645/mac.9182 · 2025 · External reference
Transparent communication of evidence does not undermine public trust in evidence
10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac280 · 2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2015 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2018 · External reference
10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · 1985 · External reference
Balancing intimacy and trust in audio journalism
10.17645/mac.10104 · 2025 · External reference
Epistemic markers in the scientific discourse
10.1017/psa.2023.97 · 2024 · External reference
Corporate communication through podcasts: the impact of voice–fit and attention during listening on parasocial interaction with the host and persuasive effects
10.1080/19376529.2024.2396840 · 2024 · External reference
How podcasting is changing the audio storytelling genre
10.1386/rjao.14.1.65_1 · 2016 · External reference
Credibility and trust of information in online environments: the use of cognitive heuristics
10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012 · 2013 · External reference
Podcasts and productivity: a qualitative uses and gratifications study
10.1080/15205436.2018.1490434 · 2019 · External reference
10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 · 1986 · External reference
Aural parasocial relations: host–listener relationships in podcasts
10.1080/19376529.2020.1870467 · 2022 · External reference
Online focus groups
10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288 · 2017 · External reference
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · 2007 · External reference
Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science
10.1098/rsos.181870 · 2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Parasocial intimacy, change, and nostalgia in podcast listener reviews
10.17645/mac.9059 · 2025 · External reference
Predicting public trust in science: the role of basic orientations toward science, perceived trustworthiness of scientists, and experiences with science
10.3389/fcomm.2021.822757 · 2022 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference