Research graph
References from Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed transcatheter versus failed surgical bioprostheses: a systematic review with exploratory meta-analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients
10.1056/nejmoa1814052 · 2019 · External reference
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients
10.1056/nejmoa1816885 · 2019 · External reference
STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.002 · 2021 · External reference
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.070 · 2015 · External reference
Long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.078 · 2019 · External reference
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves
10.1001/jama.2014.7246 · 2014 · External reference
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation within degenerated aortic surgical bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 valve-in-valve registry
10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.057 · 2017 · External reference
Repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement for transcatheter prosthesis dysfunction
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.051 · 2020 · External reference
Transcatheter replacement of transcatheter versus surgically implanted aortic valve bioprostheses
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.053 · 2021 · External reference
Comparative 3-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed transcatheter versus surgical valves
10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.08.052 · 2026 · External reference
Valve-in-valve for degenerated transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus valve-in-valve for degenerated surgical aortic bioprostheses: a 3-center comparison of hemodynamic and 1-year outcome
10.1161/jaha.119.013973 · 2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 · 2021 · External reference
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · 2016 · External reference
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
10.1136/bmj.i4919 · 2016 · External reference
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · 1997 · External reference
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range
10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 · 2014 · External reference
Standard deviations and standard errors
10.1136/bmj.331.7521.903 · 2005 · External reference
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022)
2022 · External reference
Valve in valve transcatheter versus redo surgical replacement of a failing surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.06.022 · 2025 · External reference
Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes
10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.400 · 1986 · External reference
P913 What can we expect after valve-in-valve procedures in failed transcatheter aortic valves?
10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0509 · 2019 · External reference
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves
10.1001/jama.2014.7246 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparative 3-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed transcatheter versus surgical valves
10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.08.052 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.070 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.002 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation within degenerated aortic surgical bioprostheses: PARTNER 2 valve-in-valve registry
10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.057 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.078 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement for transcatheter prosthesis dysfunction
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.051 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Transcatheter replacement of transcatheter versus surgically implanted aortic valve bioprostheses
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.053 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Valve in valve transcatheter versus redo surgical replacement of a failing surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.06.022 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes
10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.400 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients
10.1056/nejmoa1814052 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients
10.1056/nejmoa1816885 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
P913 What can we expect after valve-in-valve procedures in failed transcatheter aortic valves?
10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0509 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Standard deviations and standard errors
10.1136/bmj.331.7521.903 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
10.1136/bmj.i4919 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Valve-in-valve for degenerated transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus valve-in-valve for degenerated surgical aortic bioprostheses: a 3-center comparison of hemodynamic and 1-year outcome
10.1161/jaha.119.013973 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range
10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
