References

How to design clinical rehabilitation trials for the upper paretic limb early post stroke?

10.1186/s13063-016-1592-x · 2016 · External reference

Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity

10.1002/ana.24472 · 2015 · External reference

Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.1177/0269215511420305 · 2012 · External reference

Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke

10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70160-7 · 2015 · External reference

When does return of voluntary finger extension occur post-stroke? A prospective cohort study

10.1371/journal.pone.0160528 · 2016 · External reference

Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery

10.1161/strokeaha.109.572065 · 2010 · External reference

The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke—a systematic review of the literature

10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.156 · 2013 · External reference

Are we armed with the right data? Pooled individual data review of biomarkers in people with severe upper limb impairment after stroke

10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.015 · 2017 · External reference

TMS measures of motor cortex function after stroke: a meta-analysis

10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.008 · 2017 · External reference

Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable

10.1177/1747493017714176 · 2017 · External reference

Evidence for interhemispheric imbalance in stroke patients as revealed by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography

10.1002/hbm.25297 · 2021 · External reference

Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation

10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.004 · 2019 · External reference

Can neurological biomarkers of brain impairment be used to predict poststroke motor recovery? A systematic review

10.1177/1545968316662708 · 2017 · External reference

The relationships of motor-evoked potentials to hand dexterity, motor function, and spasticity in chronic stroke patients: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

10.1007/s13760-016-0633-2 · 2016 · External reference

Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization

10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.001 · 2004 · External reference

PREP2: a biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke

10.1002/acn3.488 · 2017 · External reference

Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce

10.1177/1747493017711816 · 2017 · External reference

Stroke rehabilitation

10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60325-5 · 2011 · External reference

Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature

10.1053/apmr.2002.35473 · 2002 · External reference

A systematic review of voluntary arm recovery in hemiparetic stroke

10.1097/npt.0b013e318198a010 · 2009 · External reference

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 · 2021 · External reference

Amsterdam efficient deduplication (AED) method. Amsterdam efficient deduplication (AED) method (version 1)

2019 · External reference

De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote

10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014 · 2016 · External reference

Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · 2016 · External reference

Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model

10.1002/ana.25679 · 2020 · External reference

Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke

10.1161/01.str.0000238594.91938.1e · 2006 · External reference

Unresolved reference

1991 · External reference

QUAPAS: an adaptation of the QUADAS-2 tool to assess prognostic accuracy studies

10.7326/m22-0276 · 2022 · External reference

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · 2011 · External reference

Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS—aspects of interrater agreement

10.1186/s41512-019-0050-0 · 2019 · External reference

PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies

10.7326/m18-1376 · 2019 · External reference

10.1002/9781119756194.ch8

10.1002/9781119756194.ch8 · 2023 · External reference

Applicability of evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to clinical practice: a conceptual review

10.2340/16501977-2843 · 2021 · External reference

A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: an international consensus study

10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.003 · 2012 · External reference

Biomarker definitions and their applications

10.1177/1535370217750088 · 2018 · External reference

Development of an interactive web-based tool to conduct and interrogate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: MetaDTA

10.1186/s12874-019-0724-x · 2019 · External reference

Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data

10.1002/jrsm.1439 · 2021 · External reference

Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values: foundations, pliabilities, and pitfalls in research and practice

10.3389/fpubh.2017.00307 · 2017 · External reference

The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance

10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x · 2003 · External reference

Differential poststroke motor recovery in an arm versus hand muscle in the absence of motor evoked potentials

10.1177/1545968319850138 · 2019 · External reference

The addition of the MEP amplitude of finger extension muscles to clinical predictors of hand function after stroke: a prospective cohort study

10.3233/rnn-180890 · 2019 · External reference

Does transcranial magnetic stimulation have an added value to clinical assessment in predicting upper-limb function very early after severe stroke?

10.1177/1545968318785044 · 2018 · External reference

The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke

10.1093/brain/aws146 · 2012 · External reference

Accuracy of the upper limb prediction algorithm PREP2 applied 2 weeks poststroke: a prospective longitudinal study

10.1177/1545968320971763 · 2021 · External reference

A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee

10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.010 · 2012 · External reference

Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee

10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · 2015 · External reference

TMS motor mapping methodology and reliability: a structured review

10.3389/fnins.2021.709368 · 2021 · External reference

Prevalence and imaging correlates of cerebral diaschisis after ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.3390/brainsci16010050 · 2025 · External reference

Modulation of cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: influence of timing and geometrical parameters and underlying mechanisms

10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.003 · 2011 · External reference

Prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute stroke

10.1161/01.str.25.11.2183 · 1994 · External reference

Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2–4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation

10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00052-0 · 1997 · External reference

Motor hand recovery after stroke. Prognostic yield of early transcranial magnetic stimulation

1999 · External reference

Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation

10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00070-1 · 2003 · External reference

Ipsilesional motor area size correlates with functional recovery after stroke: a 6-month follow-up longitudinal TMS motor mapping study

10.3233/rnn-140454 · 2015 · External reference

Prediction of recovery from upper extremity paralysis after stroke by measuring evoked potentials

10.2340/165019771997155159 · 1997 · External reference

Motor evoked potentials in predicting recovery from upper extremity paralysis after acute stroke

10.1159/000071126 · 2003 · External reference

Comparison of TMS and DTT for predicting motor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage

10.1016/j.jns.2009.10.019 · 2010 · External reference

Utility of Transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor imaging for prediction of upper-limb motor recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients

10.4103/aian.aian_254_21 · 2022 · External reference

Prognostic value of motor evoked potentials in motor function recovery of upper limb after stroke

10.2340/16501977-0389 · 2009 · External reference

Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00419-3 · 2000 · External reference

Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: the role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment

10.1177/1545968308317578 · 2009 · External reference