Research graph
References from Factors associated with risk perception among school and nursery school teachers concerning potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Unresolved reference
External reference
Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 Khz to 300 Ghz)
10.1097/hp.0000000000001210 · 2020 · External reference
The role of electromagnetic fields in neurological disorders
10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.04.003 · 2016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: a systematic literature review
10.1038/jes.2017.13 · 2018 · External reference
Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (rf-emf) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits
10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.007 · 2014 · External reference
Long-term residential magnetic field exposure and neurodegenerative disease mortality: an 18-year Nationwide cohort study in Switzerland
10.1016/j.envint.2026.110145 · 2026 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2026 · External reference
Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk – cosmos, a prospective cohort study
10.1016/j.envint.2024.108552 · 2024 · External reference
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on Cancer risk in the general and working population: a systematic review of human observational studies – part I: Most researched outcomes
10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983 · 2024 · External reference
Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: results from the international Mobi-kids study
10.1016/j.envint.2021.107069 · 2022 · External reference
Long-term effect of Mobile phone use on sleep quality: results from the cohort study of Mobile phone use and health (Cosmos)
10.1016/j.envint.2020.105687 · 2020 · External reference
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on tinnitus, migraine and non-specific symptoms in the general and working population: a systematic review and Meta-analysis on human observational studies
10.1016/j.envint.2023.108338 · 2024 · External reference
Exposure perception as a key indicator of risk perception and acceptance of sources of radio frequency electromagnetic fields
10.1155/2015/198272 · 2015 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Better writing in scientific publications builds reader confidence and understanding
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714321 · 2021 · External reference
Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: evidence from metacognition
10.1177/0963662519865687 · 2019 · External reference
People’s responses to risks of electromagnetic fields and trust in government policy: the role of perceived risk, benefits and control
10.1080/13669877.2012.761270 · 2013 · External reference
Does personal relevance moderate communication effects? The example of risk communication about 5g-related electromagnetic fields
10.12688/openreseurope.19236.2 · 2025 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Teachers as multipliers of knowledge about schistosomiasis: a possible approach for health education programmes
10.1186/s12879-022-07829-x · 2022 · External reference
Knowledge, risk perception and information needs of general practitioners regarding potential health effects of electromagnetic fields: a scoping review of the scientific literature
10.1051/radiopro/2023038 · 2024 · External reference
Predictors of risk perception among general practitioners and paediatricians concerning potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields
10.1002/bem.70047 · 2026 · External reference
The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields
10.3238/arztebl.2010.0817 · 2010 · External reference
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
10.2307/249008 · 1989 · External reference
Acceptance determinants of 5g services
10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.8.006 · 2021 · External reference
Psychological drivers of individual differences in risk perception: a systematic case study focusing on 5G
10.1177/0956797621998312 · 2021 · External reference
Media health literacy (Mhl): development and measurement of the concept among adolescents
10.1093/her/cyr007 · 2011 · External reference
5g and Emf exposure: misinformation, open questions, and potential solutions
10.3389/frcmn.2021.635716 · 2021 · External reference
Relationship between digital health literacy, distrust in the health system and health anxiety in health sciences students
10.1186/s12909-025-06903-7 · 2025 · External reference
Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain
10.1002/ejsp.2530 · 2018 · External reference
Understanding conspiracy theories
10.1111/pops.12568 · 2019 · External reference
The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5g: spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114546 · 2022 · External reference
The 5g Covid-19 digital wildfire: an evolving network of twitter contacts to explore phase transition metaphors in viral misinformation
10.1371/journal.pone.0343661 · 2026 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge
10.1111/0272-4332.205064 · 2000 · External reference
Perception of Mobile phone and Base Station risks
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00672.x · 2005 · External reference
Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (emf) risks
10.1111/1539-6924.00349 · 2003 · External reference
Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior
10.1177/0022022105275962 · 2005 · External reference
Risk perception of electromagnetic fields among school teachers and nursery school teachers: a mixed-methods study
10.1186/s12889-026-27964-3 · 2026 · External reference
Risks of electromagnetic fields from the perspective of general practitioners and pediatricians
10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9 · 2025 · External reference
Risk perception: reflections on 40 years of research
10.1111/risa.13599 · 2020 · External reference
Acceptance of 5G technology: mediation role of trust and concentration
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585 · 2020 · External reference
Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland Vor Und Während Der Corona-Pandemie
10.1055/a-1560-2479 · 2021 · External reference
Pylons ablaze: examining the role of 5g Covid-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence
10.1111/bjso.12394 · 2020 · External reference
Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: implications for theory and measurement
10.1111/bjop.12231 · 2017 · External reference
Explaining media trust among journalists and recipients: different experiences, different predictors?
10.1177/14648849231190698 · 2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2020 · External reference
Brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan
10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · 2017 · External reference
Ordinal regression models in psychology: a tutorial
10.1177/2515245918823199 · 2019 · External reference
Stan: a probabilistic programming language
10.18637/jss.v076.i01 · 2017 · External reference
Shining a spotlight on the dangerous consequences of conspiracy theories
10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101363 · 2022 · External reference
The psychology of conspiracy theories
10.1177/0963721417718261 · 2017 · External reference
The antidepressant hoax: conspiracy theories decrease health-seeking intentions
10.1111/bjso.12426 · 2021 · External reference
The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions
10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · 2014 · External reference
Traumatic rift: how conspiracy beliefs undermine cohesion after societal trauma?
10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1699 · 2019 · External reference
Conspiracies and the nocebo effect during the Covid-19 pandemic
10.1093/pubmed/fdab327 · 2022 · External reference
Health conspiracy theories: a scoping review of drivers, impacts, and countermeasures
10.1186/s12939-025-02451-0 · 2025 · External reference
Conspiracy theories: a public health concern and how to address it
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682931 · 2021 · External reference
Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories
10.1002/acp.3301 · 2017 · External reference
Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories
10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586 · 2016 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Covid-19 conspiracies, trust in authorities, and duty to comply with social distancing restrictions
10.1007/s43576-021-00042-x · 2022 · External reference
Conspiracy theory beliefs and political trust: the moderating role of political communication
10.17645/pag.v10i4.5755 · 2022 · External reference
Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation
10.1098/rsos.211719 · 2022 · External reference
(un)healthy behavior? The relationship between media literacy, nutritional behavior, and self-representation on Instagram
10.17645/mac.v7i2.1871 · 2019 · External reference
Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories
10.1002/acp.3301 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Predictors of risk perception among general practitioners and paediatricians concerning potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields
10.1002/bem.70047 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain
10.1002/ejsp.2530 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Covid-19 conspiracies, trust in authorities, and duty to comply with social distancing restrictions
10.1007/s43576-021-00042-x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Shining a spotlight on the dangerous consequences of conspiracy theories
10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101363 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (rf-emf) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits
10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.007 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Long-term effect of Mobile phone use on sleep quality: results from the cohort study of Mobile phone use and health (Cosmos)
10.1016/j.envint.2020.105687 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: results from the international Mobi-kids study
10.1016/j.envint.2021.107069 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on tinnitus, migraine and non-specific symptoms in the general and working population: a systematic review and Meta-analysis on human observational studies
10.1016/j.envint.2023.108338 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk – cosmos, a prospective cohort study
10.1016/j.envint.2024.108552 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on Cancer risk in the general and working population: a systematic review of human observational studies – part I: Most researched outcomes
10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Long-term residential magnetic field exposure and neurodegenerative disease mortality: an 18-year Nationwide cohort study in Switzerland
10.1016/j.envint.2026.110145 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The role of electromagnetic fields in neurological disorders
10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.04.003 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Acceptance of 5G technology: mediation role of trust and concentration
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5g: spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization
10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114546 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: a systematic literature review
10.1038/jes.2017.13 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Knowledge, risk perception and information needs of general practitioners regarding potential health effects of electromagnetic fields: a scoping review of the scientific literature
10.1051/radiopro/2023038 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland Vor Und Während Der Corona-Pandemie
10.1055/a-1560-2479 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories
10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
People’s responses to risks of electromagnetic fields and trust in government policy: the role of perceived risk, benefits and control
10.1080/13669877.2012.761270 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Media health literacy (Mhl): development and measurement of the concept among adolescents
10.1093/her/cyr007 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Conspiracies and the nocebo effect during the Covid-19 pandemic
10.1093/pubmed/fdab327 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 Khz to 300 Ghz)
10.1097/hp.0000000000001210 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation
10.1098/rsos.211719 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge
10.1111/0272-4332.205064 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (emf) risks
10.1111/1539-6924.00349 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: implications for theory and measurement
10.1111/bjop.12231 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Pylons ablaze: examining the role of 5g Covid-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence
10.1111/bjso.12394 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The antidepressant hoax: conspiracy theories decrease health-seeking intentions
10.1111/bjso.12426 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perception of Mobile phone and Base Station risks
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00672.x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Understanding conspiracy theories
10.1111/pops.12568 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Risk perception: reflections on 40 years of research
10.1111/risa.13599 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Exposure perception as a key indicator of risk perception and acceptance of sources of radio frequency electromagnetic fields
10.1155/2015/198272 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior
10.1177/0022022105275962 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Psychological drivers of individual differences in risk perception: a systematic case study focusing on 5G
10.1177/0956797621998312 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: evidence from metacognition
10.1177/0963662519865687 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The psychology of conspiracy theories
10.1177/0963721417718261 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Explaining media trust among journalists and recipients: different experiences, different predictors?
10.1177/14648849231190698 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Ordinal regression models in psychology: a tutorial
10.1177/2515245918823199 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Risks of electromagnetic fields from the perspective of general practitioners and pediatricians
10.1186/s12875-025-02762-9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Teachers as multipliers of knowledge about schistosomiasis: a possible approach for health education programmes
10.1186/s12879-022-07829-x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Risk perception of electromagnetic fields among school teachers and nursery school teachers: a mixed-methods study
10.1186/s12889-026-27964-3 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Relationship between digital health literacy, distrust in the health system and health anxiety in health sciences students
10.1186/s12909-025-06903-7 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Health conspiracy theories: a scoping review of drivers, impacts, and countermeasures
10.1186/s12939-025-02451-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Does personal relevance moderate communication effects? The example of risk communication about 5g-related electromagnetic fields
10.12688/openreseurope.19236.2 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions
10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The 5g Covid-19 digital wildfire: an evolving network of twitter contacts to explore phase transition metaphors in viral misinformation
10.1371/journal.pone.0343661 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
(un)healthy behavior? The relationship between media literacy, nutritional behavior, and self-representation on Instagram
10.17645/mac.v7i2.1871 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Conspiracy theory beliefs and political trust: the moderating role of political communication
10.17645/pag.v10i4.5755 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Stan: a probabilistic programming language
10.18637/jss.v076.i01 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan
10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
10.2307/249008 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields
10.3238/arztebl.2010.0817 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Conspiracy theories: a public health concern and how to address it
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682931 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Better writing in scientific publications builds reader confidence and understanding
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714321 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
5g and Emf exposure: misinformation, open questions, and potential solutions
10.3389/frcmn.2021.635716 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Acceptance determinants of 5g services
10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.8.006 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Traumatic rift: how conspiracy beliefs undermine cohesion after societal trauma?
10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1699 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
