Research graph
References from Robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and direct pairwise meta-analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement
10.1111/hpb.12450 · 2015 · External reference
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: current therapy
10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.344 · 2014 · External reference
Cholangiocarcinoma — evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies
10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.157 · 2018 · External reference
Our rationale of initiating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a proposal of criteria for “borderline resectable” in the field of surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.1007/s00268-018-04883-y · 2019 · External reference
Current status of laparoscopic radical hilar cholangiocarcinoma in mainland China
10.5582/bst.2020.03010 · 2020 · External reference
Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience
10.1007/s00423-018-1649-2 · 2018 · External reference
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma—novel benchmark values for surgical and oncological outcomes from 24 expert centers
10.1097/sla.0000000000005103 · 2021 · External reference
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: are we ready to step towards minimally invasiveness?
10.1007/s13304-020-00752-3 · 2020 · External reference
The role of robotic surgery for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
10.3389/fonc.2022.1001838 · 2022 · External reference
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations
10.7326/m14-2385 · 2015 · External reference
Network meta-analysis: application and practice using stata
10.4178/epih.e2017047 · 2017 · External reference
When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation
10.1136/bmj.k4817 · 2019 · External reference
Standardized mean differences in meta-analysis: a tutorial
10.1002/cesm.12047 · 2024 · External reference
Meta-Analysis of odds ratios: current good practices
10.1097/mlr.0000000000000696 · 2017 · External reference
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
10.1002/jrsm.1044 · 2012 · External reference
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression
10.1002/jrsm.1045 · 2012 · External reference
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016 · 2011 · External reference
Introducing the treatment hierarchy question in network meta-analysis
10.1093/aje/kwab278 · 2022 · External reference
A GRADE working group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis
10.1136/bmj.g5630 · 2014 · External reference
Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.005 · 2018 · External reference
CINeMA: an approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis
10.1371/journal.pmed.1003082 · 2020 · External reference
GRADE Guidelines 33: addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.011 · 2021 · External reference
Biliary-enteric reconstruction in laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study
10.1186/s12885-023-10942-y · 2023 · External reference
Comparison of efficacy and safety between laparoscopic and open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma—a propensity score-matching analysis
10.3389/fonc.2022.1004974 · 2022 · External reference
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on short-term and long-term outcomes
10.1007/s00464-021-08686-6 · 2022 · External reference
Preliminary comparison of total laparoscopic and open radical resection for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma a single-center cohort study
10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.07.158 · 2023 · External reference
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical resection for bismuth types III and IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience from China
10.3389/fonc.2023.1280513 · 2023 · External reference
Survival analysis of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study
10.1186/s12957-024-03327-3 · 2024 · External reference
Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.1007/s00464-019-07211-0 · 2020 · External reference
[Robotic hilar cholangiocarcinoma radical resection compared with laparotomy in prognosis]
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2020.03.012 · 2020 · External reference
Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series
10.1007/s00464-016-4925-7 · 2016 · External reference
Comparison of the efficacy of different surgical approaches for bismuth type I hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.01.023 · 2020 · External reference
Analysis of laparoscopic and open radical resection for bismuth-Ⅰ hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.02.003 · 2018 · External reference
Clinical efficacy of two surgical procedures in radical resection of bismuth type Ⅰ hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.06.005 · 2019 · External reference
Comparative study of laparoscopic and open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
2014 · External reference
Clinical study of total laparoscopic and open radical resection for bismuth type Ⅲb hilar cholangiocarcinoma
2019 · External reference
Clinical outcomes of robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a first, multicenter, trans-Atlantic, expert-center, collaborative study
10.1245/s10434-023-14307-4 · 2024 · External reference
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score analysis of short- term outcomes
10.1186/s12885-023-10783-9 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2021 · External reference
Unresolved reference
2012 · External reference
Comparative study on safety and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic and open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.16193/j.cnki.hnwk.2024.03.068 · 2024 · External reference
Is it time to define the scope of safety for robotic resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery? A propensity score matching based analysis of a single center experience
10.14701/ahbps.25-012 · 2025 · External reference
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic operation in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients: a case control study
10.1007/s00464-025-11742-0 · 2025 · External reference
Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9 · 2019 · External reference
The long-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared with the open approach: a real-world multicentric analysis
10.1245/s10434-022-12647-1 · 2023 · External reference
Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review
10.1111/ans.15948 · 2021 · External reference
State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery
10.1007/s00268-013-2276-2 · 2013 · External reference
Three-Device (3D) technique for liver parenchyma dissection in robotic liver surgery
10.3390/jcm10225265 · 2021 · External reference
Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial
10.1007/s00464-017-5973-3 · 2018 · External reference
Robotic-assisted surgery improves short-term outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a referral-center cohort study
10.1007/s00464-025-12426-5 · 2026 · External reference
Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis
10.1371/journal.pone.0240593 · 2020 · External reference
Comparative cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.015 · 2024 · External reference
Postoperative morbidity adversely impacts oncological prognosis after curative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3748/wjg.v28.i9.948 · 2022 · External reference
Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the short- and long-term results
10.3390/cancers15113048 · 2023 · External reference
Risk prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.1111/jgh.13966 · 2018 · External reference
Standardized mean differences in meta-analysis: a tutorial
10.1002/cesm.12047 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
10.1002/jrsm.1044 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression
10.1002/jrsm.1045 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
State of the art in robotic hepatobiliary surgery
10.1007/s00268-013-2276-2 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Our rationale of initiating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a proposal of criteria for “borderline resectable” in the field of surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.1007/s00268-018-04883-y · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience
10.1007/s00423-018-1649-2 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series
10.1007/s00464-016-4925-7 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial
10.1007/s00464-017-5973-3 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.1007/s00464-019-07211-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on short-term and long-term outcomes
10.1007/s00464-021-08686-6 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic operation in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients: a case control study
10.1007/s00464-025-11742-0 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Robotic-assisted surgery improves short-term outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a referral-center cohort study
10.1007/s00464-025-12426-5 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
10.1007/s11701-019-00964-9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: are we ready to step towards minimally invasiveness?
10.1007/s13304-020-00752-3 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Preliminary comparison of total laparoscopic and open radical resection for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma a single-center cohort study
10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.07.158 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.005 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
GRADE Guidelines 33: addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.011 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparative cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.015 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Cholangiocarcinoma — evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies
10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.157 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Introducing the treatment hierarchy question in network meta-analysis
10.1093/aje/kwab278 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Meta-Analysis of odds ratios: current good practices
10.1097/mlr.0000000000000696 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma—novel benchmark values for surgical and oncological outcomes from 24 expert centers
10.1097/sla.0000000000005103 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review
10.1111/ans.15948 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement
10.1111/hpb.12450 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Risk prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.1111/jgh.13966 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
A GRADE working group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis
10.1136/bmj.g5630 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation
10.1136/bmj.k4817 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score analysis of short- term outcomes
10.1186/s12885-023-10783-9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Biliary-enteric reconstruction in laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study
10.1186/s12885-023-10942-y · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Survival analysis of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study
10.1186/s12957-024-03327-3 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The long-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma compared with the open approach: a real-world multicentric analysis
10.1245/s10434-022-12647-1 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Clinical outcomes of robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a first, multicenter, trans-Atlantic, expert-center, collaborative study
10.1245/s10434-023-14307-4 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
CINeMA: an approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis
10.1371/journal.pmed.1003082 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis
10.1371/journal.pone.0240593 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Is it time to define the scope of safety for robotic resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery? A propensity score matching based analysis of a single center experience
10.14701/ahbps.25-012 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparative study on safety and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic and open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.16193/j.cnki.hnwk.2024.03.068 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The role of robotic surgery for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
10.3389/fonc.2022.1001838 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of efficacy and safety between laparoscopic and open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma—a propensity score-matching analysis
10.3389/fonc.2022.1004974 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical resection for bismuth types III and IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience from China
10.3389/fonc.2023.1280513 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Minimally invasive surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the short- and long-term results
10.3390/cancers15113048 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Three-Device (3D) technique for liver parenchyma dissection in robotic liver surgery
10.3390/jcm10225265 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Postoperative morbidity adversely impacts oncological prognosis after curative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3748/wjg.v28.i9.948 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
[Robotic hilar cholangiocarcinoma radical resection compared with laparotomy in prognosis]
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2020.03.012 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Clinical efficacy of two surgical procedures in radical resection of bismuth type Ⅰ hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.06.005 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparison of the efficacy of different surgical approaches for bismuth type I hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.01.023 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Analysis of laparoscopic and open radical resection for bismuth-Ⅰ hilar cholangiocarcinoma
10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.02.003 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Network meta-analysis: application and practice using stata
10.4178/epih.e2017047 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: current therapy
10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.344 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Current status of laparoscopic radical hilar cholangiocarcinoma in mainland China
10.5582/bst.2020.03010 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations
10.7326/m14-2385 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
