Research graph
References from Comparison of ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cage versus zero-p implant for the treatment of cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion
10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009 · 1958 · External reference
A preliminary study of the use of cage and plating for single-segment fusion in degenerative cervical spine disease
10.1016/j.jocn.2005.02.018 · 2006 · External reference
Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft
10.1097/00006123-200202000-00001 · 2002 · External reference
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating
10.1016/j.jocn.2006.04.003 · 2007 · External reference
Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study
10.1097/brs.0b013e318198ce10 · 2009 · External reference
Fusion and failure following anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: 6-months results of a multi-centric, prospective, randomized, controlled study
10.1007/s00586-007-0451-6 · 2007 · External reference
Is screw position a greater contributor to adjacent segment disease than plate-to-disc distance following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
10.1186/s12891-025-08285-9 · 2025 · External reference
Esophageal perforation following C4-C6 anterior cervical corpectomy with anterior plate fixation: a rare but life-threatening complication requiring surgical repair
10.1002/ccr3.71813 · 2026 · External reference
Clinical and radiographic outcomes after index anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody spacer with integrated anchor fixation: a single-surgeon case study
10.21037/jss-24-32 · 2024 · External reference
Analyzing results of cervical sagittal parameters in patients operated with polyetheretherketone cages without plate
10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_35_24 · 2024 · External reference
Does the angulation of the screws in the zero-P implant affect the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients?
10.1111/os.14182 · 2024 · External reference
Assessing surgical outcomes for cage plate system versus stand-alone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.079 · 2024 · External reference
Zero-P and ROI-C implants versus traditional titanium plate with cage to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiological results with 5 years of follow-up
10.1186/s12891-023-06657-7 · 2023 · External reference
Comparative efficacy of zero-profile implant and conventional cage-plate implant in the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1186/s13018-024-04729-5 · 2024 · External reference
Cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
10.1007/s10143-025-03939-7 · 2026 · External reference
Comparing outcomes between cage alone and plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical fusion: a retrospective clinical series
10.4055/cios24036 · 2025 · External reference
Revision surgery after single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate vs stand-alone cage over 2 to 5 year follow-up
10.1177/21925682241279528 · 2025 · External reference
Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical plate fixation versus integrated fixation cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
10.1097/bsd.0000000000001630 · 2025 · External reference
Comparative analysis of cage subsidence in anterior cervical decompression and fusion: zero profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) vs. Conventional cage and plate construct
10.3389/fsurg.2021.736680 · 2021 · External reference
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate and cage for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.102 · 2024 · External reference
Comparison of stand-alone anchored spacer and plate-cage construct for surgical treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a meta-analysis
10.1177/21925682251327599 · 2025 · External reference
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 · 2021 · External reference
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
10.1136/bmj.i4919 · 2016 · External reference
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · 2008 · External reference
Comparative review of anchored cage devices and standalone cages in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries
10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_195_25 · 2026 · External reference
Segmental kyphosis after cervical interbody fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a comparative study on 2 different PEEK cages
10.1097/bsd.0000000000000137 · 2015 · External reference
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile versus stand-alone cages for two-level cervical spondylosis: a retrospective cohort study
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1002744 · 2022 · External reference
Standalone cage versus anchored cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
10.1007/s00264-022-05493-z · 2022 · External reference
A pragmatic single centre retrospective comparative review of complication profile between PEEK cages and zero-P cage screw constructs
10.1080/02688697.2021.2005772 · 2024 · External reference
Cervical stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage versus zero-profile anchored spacer in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: minimum 2-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcome
10.3340/jkns.2015.58.2.119 · 2015 · External reference
Outcomes evaluation of zero-profile devices compared to stand-alone PEEK cages for the treatment of three- and four-level cervical disc disease
10.7759/cureus.775 · 2016 · External reference
Cervical stand-alone peek cage versus anchored cage with screws in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective cohort study
10.1097/bco.0000000000000853 · 2020 · External reference
Comparison of radiologic outcomes of different methods in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
10.14245/kjs.2016.13.3.91 · 2016 · External reference
Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?
10.1097/brs.0000000000000864 · 2015 · External reference
A retrospective evaluation and review of radiographic outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures: northern Ireland’s experience
10.7759/cureus.38864 · 2023 · External reference
Surgical outcome of a zero-profile device comparing with stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate with iliac bone graft in the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.169 · 2014 · External reference
Comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes between the self-locking stand-alone cage and conventional cage-plate construct: a five-year retrospective cohort study
10.1097/brs.0000000000004465 · 2023 · External reference
A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study
10.1007/s00586-016-4739-2 · 2017 · External reference
The efficacy of anchored stand-alone spacers in comparison to conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for clinical and radiological outcomes
10.1016/j.bas.2024.102748 · 2024 · External reference
Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1186/s13018-023-03885-4 · 2023 · External reference
Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1186/s13018-023-04134-4 · 2023 · External reference
A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques
10.1097/brs.0000000000000768 · 2015 · External reference
Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation?
10.1097/01.brs.0000172148.86756.ce · 2005 · External reference
Successful anterior fusion following posterior cervical fusion for revision of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion pseudarthrosis
10.1016/j.jocn.2015.07.019 · 2016 · External reference
Anterior 1-2 level cervical corpectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a retrospective study with lordotic porous tantalum cages. Long-term changes in sagittal alignment and their clinical and radiological implications after cage subsidence
10.14444/8207 · 2022 · External reference
Does titanium cage subsidence affect clinical outcomes in ACDF surgery? A tertiary center experience
10.1308/rcsann.2022.0050 · 2023 · External reference
