Research graph
References from Chemical Fertilizer Abatement and Ecological Compensation in China’s Northeast Black Soil Region: An Assessment with a Fertilization Balance Equivalence Framework. Local targets link to admitted publications; unresolved targets remain external evidence.
For the protection of black soils
10.1038/s43016-025-01126-x · 2025 · External reference
Risk of sustainable agricultural water supply and security strategy in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China
10.1016/j.scib.2025.04.046 · 2025 · External reference
Quantitative assessment of soil productivity and predicted impacts of water erosion in the black soil region of northeastern China
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.061 · 2018 · External reference
Spatiotemporal variations of freeze-thaw erosion risk during 1991–2020 in the black soil region, northeastern China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110149 · 2023 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Changes in cropland soil color in Northeast China’s black soils region over the past 30 years
10.1016/j.still.2025.106750 · 2025 · External reference
10.3390/ijerph19137762
10.3390/ijerph19137762 · External reference
10.3390/agriculture12091442
10.3390/agriculture12091442 · External reference
What Affects Farmers’ Ecocompensation Expectations? An Empirical Study of Returning Farmland to Forest in China
10.1177/1940082919857190 · 2019 · External reference
Emerging Policy Framework on China’s Market-based and Diverse Ecological Compensation Mechanism
2019 · External reference
10.3389/fmars.2025.1514149
10.3389/fmars.2025.1514149 · External reference
Ecological compensation for natural resource utilisation in China
10.1080/09640568.2012.740409 · 2014 · External reference
Ecological damage compensation for coastal sea area uses
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.001 · 2014 · External reference
China’s PES-like horizontal eco-compensation program: Combining market-oriented mechanisms and government interventions
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101164 · 2020 · External reference
10.3390/w14050777
10.3390/w14050777 · External reference
The political dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Cascade or stairway?
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.024 · 2017 · External reference
Payments for ecosystem services (PES): A flexible, participatory, and integrated approach for improved conservation and equity outcomes
10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7 · 2016 · External reference
Farmers’ Differentiation, Value Cognition and Farmers’ Integration into Market-Oriented Ecological Compensation: Taking the Reduced Amount of Chemical Fertilizer Application as an Example
2024 · External reference
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415309
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415309 · External reference
Raveling the nexus between urban expansion and cropland loss in China
10.1007/s10980-023-01653-7 · 2023 · External reference
Marketization path of tourism ecological compensation and theoretical analysis
2020 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
10.1371/journal.pone.0294561
10.1371/journal.pone.0294561 · External reference
The logical mechanism and breakthrough path for the activation of ecological resources value to promote rural revitalization
2024 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Research on Regional Ecological Compensation Performance Appraisal Based on Propensity Score Analysis
2015 · External reference
The spatio-temporal variations of cultivated land compensation efficiency and its influencing factors in mainland China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112596 · 2024 · External reference
10.3390/su15086851
10.3390/su15086851 · External reference
From Eco-indemnity to Eco-compensation and Further to Eco-product Value Substantiation
2020 · External reference
Costs and benefits of clean heating subsidies for rural residents in northern China
10.1108/caer-12-2023-0378 · 2025 · External reference
10.3390/agriculture10060228
10.3390/agriculture10060228 · External reference
Evaluation of Financial Subsidy for Agriculture Based on Combined Algorithm
2022 · External reference
Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Ecological Compensation for Water Source Areas in the Xin’anjiang River Basin
2020 · External reference
Analysis and Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Horizontal Ecological Compensation Policy Between Upstream and Downstream of Luanhe River
2021 · External reference
10.3390/agriculture12081177
10.3390/agriculture12081177 · External reference
10.3390/agriculture12091479
10.3390/agriculture12091479 · External reference
Can economic incentives encourage actual reductions in pesticide use and environmental spillovers?
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00581.x · 2012 · External reference
10.3390/ijerph20054618
10.3390/ijerph20054618 · External reference
The dilemma and breakthrough of urban construction waste pollution control: Based on the perspective of ecological compensation
2024 · External reference
10.3389/fenvs.2021.724483
10.3389/fenvs.2021.724483 · External reference
Multiobjective Optimization for Eco-Compensation Space Selection based on Gross Ecosystem Product
10.34133/ehs.0095 · 2023 · External reference
External Costs of Agricultural Production in the United States
2004 · External reference
Studies on the External Costs of and the Optimum Use of Nitrogen Fertilizer Based on the Balance of Economic and Ecological Benefits in the Paddy Field System of the Dongting Lake Area
2006 · External reference
Environmental Costs Accounting of Chemical Fertilizer Application on Different Land Use Types
2018 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Study on the Optimal Fertilizer Application with Ecological Benefits in mind: A Case of Apple Fertilizer Input in China
2019 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Rates and causes of black soil erosion in Northeast China
10.1016/j.catena.2022.106250 · 2022 · External reference
Analysis of conservation practices for black soil based on organic matter and nitrogen contents in the black soil region of Northeast China
10.1038/s41598-025-09426-9 · 2025 · External reference
Cultivated land protection policies in China facing 2030: Dynamic balance system versus basic farmland zoning
10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.09.002 · 2017 · External reference
Evolution Characteristics and Laws of Cultivated Land Protection Policy in China Based on Policy Quantification
2020 · External reference
The Policy Evolution, Vision Goal and Realization Path of China’s Cultivated Land Protection and Utilization
2022 · External reference
Evolutionary logic and effect inspection of China’s cultivated land protection policies from the perspective of ecological civilization
2024 · External reference
Cropland parcels mapping method and distribution characteristics in northeast China’s black soil region based on meter-level remote sensing images and cloud platform
10.1080/15481603.2026.2690325 · 2026 · External reference
10.3390/land13071082
10.3390/land13071082 · External reference
10.3390/land14010031
10.3390/land14010031 · External reference
Nonpoint Source Pollution and Control of Fertilizer Input in Agricultural Production in Water Conservation Area: Empirical Analysis Based on Microdata
2016 · External reference
Exploring regional ecological compensation of cultivated land from the perspective of the mismatch between grain supply and demand
10.1007/s10668-022-02690-z · 2023 · External reference
Study on the High Chemical Fertilizers Consumption and Fertilization Behavior of Small Rural Household in China: Discovery from 1995~2016 National Fixed Point Survey Data
2019 · External reference
10.3390/agriculture13010150
10.3390/agriculture13010150 · External reference
Unresolved reference
External reference
Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action- and results-based agri-environmental payments in Switzerland
10.1111/ajae.12284 · 2021 · External reference
The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020 · 2017 · External reference
Improving the ecological and economic performance of agri-environment schemes: Payment by modelled results versus payment for actions
10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106688 · 2023 · External reference
The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers’ participation in voluntary agrienvironmental schemes: A systematic review
10.1111/1477-9552.12538 · 2023 · External reference
Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: A systematic review
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101159 · 2020 · External reference
Under what conditions do payments for environmental services enable forest conservation in the Amazon? A realist synthesis
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107697 · 2023 · External reference
Economic Incentives to Improve Water Quality in Agricultural Landscapes: Some New Variations on Old Ideas
10.1093/ajae/aaq190 · 2011 · External reference
Policy Instruments for Water Quality Protection
10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151903 · 2013 · External reference
Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: Exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness
10.1017/s0030605311001372 · 2012 · External reference
Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014 · 2008 · External reference
Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program
10.3368/le.81.2.247 · 2005 · External reference
Payments for ecosystem services (PES): A flexible, participatory, and integrated approach for improved conservation and equity outcomes
10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Exploring regional ecological compensation of cultivated land from the perspective of the mismatch between grain supply and demand
10.1007/s10668-022-02690-z · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Raveling the nexus between urban expansion and cropland loss in China
10.1007/s10980-023-01653-7 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Rates and causes of black soil erosion in Northeast China
10.1016/j.catena.2022.106250 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The political dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Cascade or stairway?
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.024 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Under what conditions do payments for environmental services enable forest conservation in the Amazon? A realist synthesis
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107697 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Ecological damage compensation for coastal sea area uses
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.001 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Spatiotemporal variations of freeze-thaw erosion risk during 1991–2020 in the black soil region, northeastern China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110149 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The spatio-temporal variations of cultivated land compensation efficiency and its influencing factors in mainland China
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112596 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: A systematic review
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101159 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
China’s PES-like horizontal eco-compensation program: Combining market-oriented mechanisms and government interventions
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101164 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Cultivated land protection policies in China facing 2030: Dynamic balance system versus basic farmland zoning
10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.09.002 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Improving the ecological and economic performance of agri-environment schemes: Payment by modelled results versus payment for actions
10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106688 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Risk of sustainable agricultural water supply and security strategy in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China
10.1016/j.scib.2025.04.046 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Quantitative assessment of soil productivity and predicted impacts of water erosion in the black soil region of northeastern China
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.061 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Changes in cropland soil color in Northeast China’s black soils region over the past 30 years
10.1016/j.still.2025.106750 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: Exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness
10.1017/s0030605311001372 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Analysis of conservation practices for black soil based on organic matter and nitrogen contents in the black soil region of Northeast China
10.1038/s41598-025-09426-9 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
For the protection of black soils
10.1038/s43016-025-01126-x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Ecological compensation for natural resource utilisation in China
10.1080/09640568.2012.740409 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Cropland parcels mapping method and distribution characteristics in northeast China’s black soil region based on meter-level remote sensing images and cloud platform
10.1080/15481603.2026.2690325 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Economic Incentives to Improve Water Quality in Agricultural Landscapes: Some New Variations on Old Ideas
10.1093/ajae/aaq190 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Costs and benefits of clean heating subsidies for rural residents in northern China
10.1108/caer-12-2023-0378 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers’ participation in voluntary agrienvironmental schemes: A systematic review
10.1111/1477-9552.12538 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action- and results-based agri-environmental payments in Switzerland
10.1111/ajae.12284 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Can economic incentives encourage actual reductions in pesticide use and environmental spillovers?
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00581.x · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Policy Instruments for Water Quality Protection
10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151903 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
What Affects Farmers’ Ecocompensation Expectations? An Empirical Study of Returning Farmland to Forest in China
10.1177/1940082919857190 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.1371/journal.pone.0294561
10.1371/journal.pone.0294561 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program
10.3368/le.81.2.247 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3389/fenvs.2021.724483
10.3389/fenvs.2021.724483 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3389/fmars.2025.1514149
10.3389/fmars.2025.1514149 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415309
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415309 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/agriculture10060228
10.3390/agriculture10060228 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/agriculture12081177
10.3390/agriculture12081177 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/agriculture12091442
10.3390/agriculture12091442 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/agriculture12091479
10.3390/agriculture12091479 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/agriculture13010150
10.3390/agriculture13010150 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/ijerph19137762
10.3390/ijerph19137762 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/ijerph20054618
10.3390/ijerph20054618 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/land13071082
10.3390/land13071082 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/land14010031
10.3390/land14010031 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/su15086851
10.3390/su15086851 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
10.3390/w14050777
10.3390/w14050777 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
Multiobjective Optimization for Eco-Compensation Space Selection based on Gross Ecosystem Product
10.34133/ehs.0095 · ExternalCitation · doi-reference
