Abstract
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Faina Nakhlis, Samantha Lynn Heller, Kimberly H. Allison, Helen A. Pass, Nathalie Johnson, Judy C. Boughey, Katharine A. Yao
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
ror
Confidence 99%
ror
Confidence 99%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
American Society of Breast Surgeons and Society of Breast Imaging 2025 guidelines for the management of benign breast fibroepithelial lesions.
10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4392 · 2025
The Tyrer-Cuzick model inaccurately predicts invasive breast cancer risk in women with LCIS.
10.1245/s10434-019-07814-w · 2020
Lobular carcinoma in situ: a 29-year longitudinal experience evaluating clinicopathologic features and breast cancer risk.
10.1200/jco.2015.61.4743 · 2015
Accuracy of the breast cancer surveillance consortium model among women with LCIS.
10.1007/s10549-021-06499-8 · 2022
Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study.
10.1093/jnci/dji372 · 2005
Population-based analysis of breast cancer incidence and survival outcomes in women diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ.
10.1245/s10434-017-5867-6 · 2017
Atypical hyperplasia of the breast–risk assessment and management options.
10.1056/nejmsr1407164 · 2015
Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo cohort study.
10.1200/jco.2006.09.0217 · 2007
Histological features associated with diagnostic agreement in atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: illustrative cases from the B-Path study.
10.1111/his.13035 · 2016
Ductal epithelial proliferations of the breast: a biological continuum? comparative genomic hybridization and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin expression patterns.
10.1002/path.982 · 2001
Quantitative analysis of allele imbalance supports atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions as direct breast cancer precursors.
10.1002/path.1973 · 2006
Morphologic and molecular evolutionary pathways of low nuclear grade invasive breast cancers and their putative precursor lesions: further evidence to support the concept of low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family.
10.1097/pas.0b013e318161d1a5 · 2008
Breast cancer precursors revisited: molecular features and progression pathways.
10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03568.x · 2010
Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia of the breast.
10.1038/modpathol.3800514 · 2006
Pathological diagnosis of columnar cell lesions of the breast: are there issues of reproducibility?
10.1136/jcp.2004.025239 · 2005
Incidence of adjacent synchronous ipsilateral infiltrating carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ in patients diagnosed with flat epithelial atypia by core needle biopsy (TBCRC 034).
10.1245/s10434-024-16762-z · 2025
The 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast.
10.1111/his.14091 · 2020
Tavassoli FA, Devilee P: Pathology and genetics: tumours of the breast and female genital organs. WHO Classification of Tumours series - volume IV. Lyon, France: IARC Press.
10.1186/bcr788 · 2004
Flat epithelial atypia and risk of breast cancer: a Mayo cohort study.
10.1002/cncr.29243 · 2015
Pure flat epithelial atypia identified on core needle biopsy does not require excision.
10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.029 · 2020
Flat epithelial atypia on core biopsy and upgrade to cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
10.1245/s10434-017-6059-0 · 2017
Atypical lobular hyperplasia and classic lobular carcinoma in situ can be safely managed without surgical excision.
10.1245/s10434-021-10827-z · 2022
Rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia have declined with less use of postmenopausal hormone treatment: findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0745 · 2009
Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: a long-term follow-up study.
10.1002/1097-0142(19850601)55:11<2698::aid-cncr2820551127>3.0.co;2-a · 1985
Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia: results from the Nurses’ Health Study.
10.1002/cncr.22408 · 2007
Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study.
10.1158/1940-6207.capr-13-0222 · 2014
Subsequent breast cancer risk following diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia on needle biopsy.
10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3022 · 2017
Risk assessment tools for women with breast atypia: a systematic review.
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116598 · 2025
Model for predicting breast cancer risk in women with atypical hyperplasia.
10.1200/jco.2017.75.9480 · 2018
Upgrade rate of percutaneously diagnosed pure atypical ductal hyperplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis of 6458 lesions.
10.1148/radiol.2019190748 · 2020
Trends in atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis and upgrade: a 20-year experience and impact of MRI use on upgrade rates.
10.1245/s10434-025-16933-6 · 2025
Atypical ductal hyperplasia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: considerations for surgical excision.
10.1245/s10434-010-1127-8 · 2011
Multivariate model to identify women at low risk of cancer upgrade after a core needle biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
10.1007/s10549-017-4253-1 · 2017
Long-term safety of observation in selected women following core biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
10.1245/s10434-016-5512-9 · 2017
Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria.
10.1097/00000478-199212000-00001 · 1992
Variability in pathologists’ interpretations of individual breast biopsy slides: a population perspective.
10.7326/m15-0964 · 2016
An improved method of preparing nuclei for absorption cytophotometry.
10.1177/33.1.2578144 · 1985
Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
10.1136/bmj.i3069 · 2016
Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel.
10.1111/his.12387 · 2014
Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on ductal carcinoma in situ.
10.1177/1066896916662154 · 2017
Incidence of adjacent synchronous invasive carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in-situ in patients with lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: results from a prospective multi-institutional registry (TBCRC 020).
10.1245/s10434-015-4922-4 · doi-reference
Evaluating the rate of upgrade to invasive breast cancer and/or ductal carcinoma in situ following a core biopsy diagnosis of non-classic lobular carcinoma in situ.
10.1245/s10434-018-6937-0 · doi-reference
Atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at core breast biopsy: use of careful radiologic-pathologic correlation to recommend excision or observation.
10.1148/radiol.13121730 · doi-reference
Classic lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia at percutaneous breast core biopsy: outcomes of prospective excision.
10.1002/cncr.27841 · doi-reference
Lobular in-situ neoplasia on breast core needle biopsy: imaging indication and pathologic extent can identify which patients require excisional biopsy.
10.1245/s10434-011-2034-3 · doi-reference
Immediate and ipsilateral recurrence rates and treatment recommendations for patients with pleomorphic and florid lobular carcinoma in situ.
10.1007/s10549-025-07771-x · doi-reference
American Registry of Pathology Expert Opinions: the spectrum of lobular carcinoma in situ: diagnostic features and clinical implications.
10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151481 · doi-reference
Screening MRI does not increase cancer detection or result in an earlier stage at diagnosis for patients with high-risk breast lesions: a propensity score analysis.
10.1245/s10434-022-12568-z · doi-reference
European guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of breast lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions) developed jointly by EUSOMA, EUSOBI, ESP (BWG) and ESSO.
10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107292 · doi-reference
Risk of breast cancer in selected women with atypical ductal hyperplasia who do not undergo surgical excision.
10.1097/sla.0000000000004849 · doi-reference
Atypical ductal hyperplasia: interobserver and intraobserver variability.
10.1038/modpathol.2011.66 · doi-reference
Inter-observer variability between general pathologists and a specialist in breast pathology in the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, columnar cell lesions, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
10.1186/1746-1596-9-121 · doi-reference