Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureErika Stewart, Joshua B. Grinath, Kathryn G. Turner
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
ror
Confidence 99%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
A standard framework for assessing the costs and benefits of restoration: Introducing The Economics of Ecosystem Restoration
10.1111/rec.13515 · 2022
Restoration ecology to the future: A call for new paradigm
10.1111/j.1526-100x.2007.00224.x · 2007
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
A sagebrush conservation design to proactively restore America's sagebrush biome
2022
Economic costs of biological invasions in the United States
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151318 · 2022
Habitat restoration and the recovery of metacommunities
10.1111/1365-2664.14445 · 2023
Degraded or just different? Perceptions and value judgements in restoration decisions
10.1111/rec.12336 · 2016
Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology
10.1111/j.1526-100x.1996.tb00112.x · 1996
Traversing the wasteland: A framework for assessing ecological threats to drylands
10.1093/biosci/biz126 · 2020
Identifying linkages among conceptual models of ecosystem degradation and restoration: Towards an integrative framework
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00145.x · 2006
A conceptual framework for urban ecological restoration and rehabilitation
10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.010 · 2021
Unresolved referenced work
2013
The potential of soil amendments for restoring severely disturbed grasslands
10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.006 · 2012
Natural analogues of degraded ecosystems enhance conservation and reconstruction in extreme environments
10.1890/08-1092.1 · 2010
Why we should not assume that habitat fragmentation is generally bad for restoration: A reply to Watts and Hughes (2024)
10.1111/rec.14385 · 2025
Management of novel ecosystems: Are novel approaches required?
10.1890/070046 · 2008
Statistical considerations of nonrandom treatment applications reveal region‐wide benefits of widespread post‐fire restoration action
10.1038/s41467-022-31102-z · 2022
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Fragmentation impacts may be mixed for conservation but generally bad for restoration
10.1111/rec.14260 · 2024
No additional external references are available.