More Improved Postoperative Range‐of‐Motion Retention After Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Arthroscopic Fellowship‐Trained Compared With Nonfellowship‐Trained Surgeons

Purpose To describe whether subspecialty training, specifically arthroscopic fellowship training, influences intraoperative range‐of‐motion (ROM) gains, postoperative ROM retention, and lysis of adhesions (LOA) complication rates. Methods Between August 1989 and May 2025, all patients who underwent arthroscopic LOA for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a single multisite academic institution with a minimum follow‐up of 3 months were reviewed. Cases were stratified by the surgeon's training: 1 group with arthroscopic fellowship training and another with nonarthroscopic or no fellowship training. Primary outcomes were intraoperative ROM change and postoperative ROM retention compared with intraoperative and pre‐TKA baseline values. Revision and periprosthetic joint infection rates were also collected. Results A total of 94 LOA cases were identified, where 48 (51.1%) were performed by nonarthroscopically trained surgeons. Intraoperative ROM improvements were similar between groups in both knee flexion (35.2° arthroscopic vs 31.1° nonarthroscopic, P  = .130) and extension (2.43° vs 3.91°, P  = .079). Compared with the intraoperative ROM, procedures performed by arthroscopically trained surgeons showed significantly better long‐term retention of both flexion (loss of 4.85° vs 15.98°, P  = .006) and extension (gain of 0.50° vs loss of 1.58°, P  = .036) at postoperative follow‐up. When compared with preprimary TKA baseline ROM, flexion at follow‐up was slightly improved in the arthroscopic group but declined significantly in the nonarthroscopic group (gain of 1.66° vs loss of 21.76°, P   Conclusions LOA performed by arthroscopic fellowship‐trained surgeons results in significantly better retention of postoperative ROM than nonfellowship‐trained surgeons when used for arthrofibrosis after TKA. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.