Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background and Aims
Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used to evaluate knee function and symptoms. WOMAC, KOOS, and OKS are commonly used knee‐specific PROMs, and their validity and reliability are well established. However, there is limited research focusing on their feasibility among older Chinese population. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of WOMAC, KOOS, and OKS among Chinese individuals aged 45 years and older, and to provide recommendations for their clinical application.
Methods
Questionnaires, including the three PROMs, informed consent forms, and demographic information, were distributed online to Chinese individuals aged 45 years and older. Study outcomes included completion time, feasibility scores, item skipping rate, PROM abandonment rate, total score of each PROM, and their intercorrelations.
Results
The completion time for WOMAC was significantly longer than OKS, but shorter than KOOS (
p
p
= 0.001) and OKS (
p
p
p
= 0.001). Feasibility scores showed no age‐related differences; however, participants with higher education attained significantly greater scores on all three PROMs (
p
p
> 0.05). However, the abandonment rate for KOOS and OKS was significantly higher than WOMAC (
p
Conclusion
All three PROMs demonstrated good feasibility and strong inter‐scale correlations in the older Chinese population. KOOS required the longest completion time, while WOMAC and OKS achieved higher feasibility scores. Higher educational level was associated with greater feasibility across all PROMs, whereas older age primarily prolonged completion time without significantly reducing feasibility.