Abstract
Hisham Omar, Paulina Bargallo Gonzalez Lugo, Rachel Bonfini, Lekha Antala, Matthew Fainor, Sarah E. Gullbrand, Michael W. Hast
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Bone Fractures in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00172-0 · 2021
Management of Segmental Bone Defects
2015
Novel Techniques and Future Perspective for Investigating Critical‐Size Bone Defects
10.3390/bioengineering9040171 · 2022
Analysis of Risk Factors for Non‐Union After Surgery for Limb Fractures: A Case‐Control Study of 669 Subjects
10.3389/fsurg.2021.754150 · 2021
The Use of Bone‐Graft Substitutes in Large Bone Defects: Any Specific Needs?
10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011 · 2011
Bioresorbable Bone Graft Substitutes of Different Osteoconductivities: A Histologic Evaluation of Osteointegration of Poly(Propylene Glycol‐Co‐Fumaric Acid)‐Based Cement Implants in Rats
10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00179-9 · 2000
Autologous Bone Graft: Is It Still the Gold Standard?
10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043 · 2021
Three‐Dimensional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
10.3390/bioengineering10070759 · 2023
From Bone Replacement to Regeneration. A Biomaterials Started Journey
10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103282 · 2026
Materials and Manufacturing Techniques for Polymeric and Ceramic Scaffolds Used in Implant Dentistry
10.3390/jcs5030078 · 2021
Triply Periodic Minimal Surface‐Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Mechanical, In Vitro and In Vivo Study
10.1089/ten.tea.2023.0033 · 2023
Optimizing Scaffold Pore Size for Tissue Engineering: Insights Across Various Tissue Types
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1444986 · 2024
Note on the Use of Different Approaches to Determine the Pore Sizes of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: What Do We Measure?
10.1186/s12938-018-0543-z · 2018
Advances and Challenges in Polymer‐Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Path Towards Personalized Regenerative Medicine
10.3390/polym16233303 · 2024
Polycaprolactone Usage in Additive Manufacturing Strategies for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review
10.1002/jbm.b.34997 · 2022
Polycaprolactone as Biomaterial for Bone Scaffolds: Review of Literature
10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003 · 2020
Polycaprolactone (PCL): The Biodegradable Polyester Shaping the Future of Materials – A Review on Synthesis, Properties, Biodegradation, Applications and Future Perspectives
10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.114033 · 2025
Tissue Scaffold Architecture Affects Implant Degradation and Bone Tissue Regeneration: A Novel In Silico Mechanobiological Model Analysing Cell Behavior, Mechanical Stress and Degradation Kinematics
10.1371/journal.pone.0349708 · 2026
Architecture Mechanics Mediated Osteogenic Progression in Bone Regeneration of Artificial Scaffolds
10.1126/sciadv.adv8804 · 2025
Structural Influences on Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review and Perspective
10.1016/j.matt.2025.102252 · 2025
Porous Geometry Guided Micro‐Mechanical Environment Within Scaffolds for Cell Mechanobiology Study in Bone Tissue Engineering
10.3389/fbioe.2021.736489 · 2021
Advances in Additive Manufacturing for Bone Tissue Engineering: Materials, Design Strategies, and Applications
10.1088/1748-605x/ad9dce · 2024
Enhancing Compressive Performance of Architected Hexagonal Honeycombs With Corrugated Stiffeners
10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106137 · 2025
The Design of Strut/TPMS‐Based Pore Geometries in Bioceramic Scaffolds Guiding Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis in Bone Regeneration
10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667 · 2023
A TPMS‐Based Method for Modeling Porous Scaffolds for Bionic Bone Tissue Engineering
10.1038/s41598-018-25750-9 · 2018
Additive Manufacturing of Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds: Fractographic Study of Gyroid Structures With Engineered Surface Roughness
10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2026.118453 · 2026
Scaffold Material‐Architecture Design Rules Linking Mechanics and Early Osteogenesis in PCL/β‐TCP Grid, Honeycomb, and Gyroid Lattices
10.1021/acsomega.5c10393 · 2026
BMP‐2‐Immobilized PCL 3D Printing Scaffold With a Leaf‐Stacked Structure as a Physically and Biologically Activated Bone Graft
10.1088/1758-5090/ad2537 · 2024
Experimental Study of rhBMP‐2 Chitosan Nano‐Sustained Release Carrier‐Loaded PLGA/nHA Scaffolds to Construct Mandibular Tissue‐Engineered Bone
10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.03.023 · 2019
Novel 3D Printed TPMS Scaffolds: Microstructure, Characteristics and Applications in Bone Regeneration
2024
Biomimetic Scaffolds Using Triply Periodic Minimal Surface‐Based Porous Structures for Biomedical Applications
10.1016/j.slast.2023.04.004 · 2023
Advanced Honeycomb Designs for Improving Mechanical Properties: A Review
10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109393 · 2021
Superiority of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Gyroid Structure to Strut‐Based Grid Structure in Both Strength and Bone Regeneration
10.1021/acsami.3c06263 · 2023
3D‐Printed Biodegradable Gyroid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications
10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.037 · 2018
PCL Strut‐Like Scaffolds Appear Superior to Gyroid in Terms of Bone Regeneration Within a Long Bone Large Defect: An In Silico Study
10.3389/fbioe.2022.995266 · 2022
A New Semi‐Orthotopic Bone Defect Model for Cell and Biomaterial Testing in Regenerative Medicine
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121187 · 2021
Porosity of 3D Biomaterial Scaffolds and Osteogenesis
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · 2005
The Effect of Pore Size on Cell Ingrowth in PLLA/HA Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
2026
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Bone Ingrowth of Various Porous Titanium Scaffolds Produced by a Moldless and Space Holder Technique: An In Vivo Study in Rabbits
10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/015012 · 2016
Optimization of Poli(ɛ‐Caprolactone) Scaffolds Suitable for 3D Cancer Cell Culture
10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.031 · doi-reference
Design of a Scaffold Parameter Selection System With Additive Manufacturing for a Biomedical Cell Culture
10.3390/ma11081427 · doi-reference
Polycaprolactone/Polysaccharide Functional Composites for Low‐Temperature Fused Deposition Modelling
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.006 · doi-reference
Comparison of Compressive Properties of 3D‐Printed Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces and Honeycomb Lattice Structures
10.3390/jcs9110586 · doi-reference