Abstract
Abstract
Nearly all exogenous loading models of bone adaptation apply dynamic loading superimposed upon a time invariant static preload (SPL) in order to ensure stable, reproducible loading of bone. Given that SPL may alter aspects of bone mechanotransduction (eg, interstitial fluid flow), we hypothesized that SPL inhibits bone formation induced by dynamic loading. As a first test of this hypothesis, we utilized a newly developed device that enables stable dynamic loading of the murine tibia with SPLs ≥ −0.01 N. We subjected the right tibias of BALB/c mice (4‐month‐old females) to dynamic loading (−3.8 N, 1 Hz, 50 cycles/day, 10 s rest) superimposed upon one of three SPLs: −1.5 N, −0.5 N, or −0.03 N. Mice underwent exogenous loading 3 days/week for 3 weeks. Metaphyseal trabecular bone adaptation (μCT) and midshaft cortical bone formation (dynamic histomorphometry) were assessed following euthanasia (day 22). Ipsilateral tibias of mice loaded with a −1.5‐N SPL demonstrated significantly less trabecular bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) than contralateral tibias (−12.9%). In contrast, the same dynamic loading superimposed on a −0.03‐N SPL significantly elevated BV/TV versus contralateral tibias (12.3%) and versus the ipsilateral tibias of the other SPL groups (−0.5 N: 46.3%, −1.5 N: 37.2%). At the midshaft, the periosteal bone formation rate (p.BFR) induced when dynamic loading was superimposed on −1.5‐N and −0.5‐N SPLs was significantly amplified in the −0.03‐N SPL group (>200%). These data demonstrate that bone anabolism induced by dynamic loading is markedly inhibited by SPL magnitudes commonly implemented in the literature (ie, −0.5 N, −1.5 N). The inhibitory impact of SPL has not been recognized in bone adaptation models and, as such, SPLs have been neither universally reported nor standardized. Our study therefore identifies a previously unrecognized, potent inhibitor of mechanoresponsiveness that has potentially confounded studies of bone adaptation and translation of insights from our field. © 2018 The Authors.JBMR PlusPublished by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.