Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly adopted in digital radiography to enhance workflow efficiency, standardisation and support for radiation dose optimisation. Auto‐thorax collimation (ATC) has been introduced to automate field size selection in chest X‐ray (CXR) imaging; however, its clinical performance and impact on collimation consistency in routine chest X‐ray practice require further evaluation.
Methods
A single‐centre retrospective study analysed 400 posteroanterior (PA) erect CXRs sourced from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) and local image archives. Collimation size was measured in both the superior–inferior and lateral dimensions. An additional, 200 erect CXRs were collected to assess the repeat rate due to collimation errors. Statistical analysis was performed using two‐sample
t
‐tests for collimation measurements and a two‐proportion
Z
‐test for repeat rates. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to quantify the variability in collimation field size for each operator across both ATC and manual collimation methods.
Results
ATC demonstrated tighter inferior and left lateral collimation than manual collimation (
p
Conclusion
AI‐based collimation provides collimation results similar to manual performance, with improved standardisation and reproducibility. Its consistent output suggests potential benefits in high‐turnover environments, enhancing workflow efficiency whilst optimising radiation safety.