Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background
Non‐specific neck pain (NSNP) is a frequent issue that can negatively affect both mobility and function. Recently, there has been growing interest in newer therapeutic approaches, including rib mobilization and diaphragm release techniques, as potential ways to address NSNP and support better outcomes for those affected.
Purpose
To find out the immediate effects of how (DRT) combined with (RMT) affects the level of pain and the extent to which patients' functional abilities are improved in cases of NSNP.
Methods
For this prospective RCT, 96 participants aged 20 to 45 years were randomly assigned to one of three equal groups based on their pain score (VAS). Group B engaged in (DRT) for 40 minutes, three times weekly for 8 weeks, in contrast to Group A, which got both RMT combined with DRT. Group C (active control) received advice and some exercises. Measurements were collected before and after the intervention; the primary outcomes included pain severity, evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS); active neck range of motion (ROM), measured with a cervical range of motion (CROM) device; and neck flexion endurance. Additionally, the secondary outcome of neck‐related disability was assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
Results
No statistically significant difference was identified among the three groups at baseline; nevertheless, a treatment effect emerged after 8 weeks (
p
= 0.001 and
f‐value
= 4.15,
ƞ
2
= 0.306). A statistically significant time‐treatment interaction was seen when comparing the pre‐ and post‐treatment periods in groups A and B (
p =
0.001
, f‐value =
3.16,
ƞ
2
=
0.251).
Conclusion
The addition of rib mobilization to diaphragm release techniques in patients with non‐specific neck pain resulted in statistically significant improvements in pain intensity, cervical flexion, right lateral rotation, left lateral rotation, right rotation, and neck flexor endurance, with moderate to large effect sizes for pain reduction and cervical motion. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups for cervical extension, left rotation, or the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and only a marginal clinical improvement in NDI was noted in Group A. The observed benefits in the combined intervention group may not be attributable solely to rib mobilization. The increased treatment complexity and greater therapist interaction inherent in the combined approach could also have influenced the outcomes.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07133646